Intracranial Aneurysm Neck Size Overestimation with 3D Rotational Angiography: The Impact on Intra-Aneurysmal Hemodynamics Simulated with Computational Fluid Dynamics

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Brisman JL,
   2. Song JK,
   3. Newell DW

   . Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2006;355:928–39

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Castro MA,
   3. Burgess JE,
   4. et al

   . Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550–59

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Cebral JR,
   2. Mut F,
   3. Weir J,
   4. et al

   . Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:264–70

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Xiang J,
   2. Natarajan SK,
   3. Tremmel M,
   4. et al

   . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Hernandez M,
   2. Frangi AF

   . Non-parametric geodesic active regions: method and evaluation for cerebral aneurysms segmentation in 3DRA and CTA. Med Image Anal 2007;11:224–41

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Geers AJ,
   2. Larrabide I,
   3. Radaelli AG,
   4. et al

   . Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an in vivo reproducibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:581–86

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Brinjikji W,
   2. Cloft H,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of 2D digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation of dome-to-neck ratio. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:831–34

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Antiga L,
   2. Piccinelli M,
   3. Botti L,
   4. et al

   . An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008;46:1097–112

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Rasband WS

   . ImageJ. U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Available at: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ [Accessed July 2011].
10. 10.↵
    1. Yushkevich P,
    2. Piven J,
    3. Hazlett HC,
    4. et al

    . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage 2006;31:1116–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Castro MA,
    3. Appanaboyina S,
    4. et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Landis J,
    2. Koch G

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Piotin M,
    2. Gailloud P,
    3. Bidaut L,
    4. et al

    . CT angiography, MR angiography and rotational digital subtraction angiography for volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms. An experimental study. Neuroradiology 2003;45:404–09

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Ozsarlak O,
    2. Van Goethem JW,
    3. Maes M,
    4. et al

    . MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications. Neuroradiology 2004;46:955–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Gauvrit J-Y,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Caron S,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 2006;37:1033–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Joseph GJ,
    3. Dion JE

    . Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 1999;30:317–20

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Kallmes DF

    . Identifying “truth” in computational fluid dynamics research. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E122; author reply E123

    FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Hoi Y,
    2. Meng H,
    3. Woodward SH,
    4. et al

    . Effects of arterial geometry on aneurysm growth: three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics study. J Neurosurg 2004;101:676–81

    PubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Spiegel M,
    2. Redel T,
    3. Zhang YJ,
    4. et al

    . Tetrahedral vs. polyhedral mesh size evaluation on flow velocity and wall shear stress for cerebral hemodynamic simulation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2011;14:9–22

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Roy AS,
    2. Back LH,
    3. Banerjee RK

    . Evaluation of compliance of arterial vessel using coupled fluid structure interaction analysis. Mol Cell Biomech 2008;5:229–46
21. 21.↵
    1. Dempere-Marco L,
    2. Oubel E,
    3. Castro M,
    4. et al

    . CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms. MICCAI 2006;9:438–45

    PubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Castro MA,
    2. Putman CM,
    3. Sheridan MJ,
    4. et al

    . Hemodynamic patterns of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a possible association with rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:297–302

    Abstract/FREE Full Text