Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

Perfusion-Weighted Imaging–Derived Collateral Flow Index is a Predictor of MCA M1 Recanalization after IV Thrombolysis

F. Nicoli, P. Lafaye de Micheaux and N. Girard
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2013, 34 (1) 107-114; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3174
F. Nicoli
aFrom the Service d'Urgences Neuro-Vasculaires (F.N.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Lafaye de Micheaux
cDépartement de Mathématiques et Statistique (P.L.d.M.), Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Girard
bService de Neuroradiologie (N.G.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM), CHU de la Timone, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Tmax maps used for nCCD quantification and corresponding ADC maps from 2 patients with different recanalization pattern. Upper images: ADC maps with lesion delineated by visual selection of the most appropriate ADC threshold value (the hotter the color, the lower the ADC value). Lower images: Tmax maps (superimposed on FLAIR images) with colored areas corresponding to moderately (yellow area) and severely (red area) hypoperfused parenchyma. A, 75-year-old woman, proximal MCA-M1 occlusion, NIHSS = 11, TTT = 135 minutes, no MCA recanalization at 24 hours. Volume of DWI abnormalities detected on all brain sections = 54.78 mL. nCCD = 105.14. B, 74-year-old woman, distal MCA-M1 occlusion, NIHSS = 15, TTT = 94 minutes, complete MCA recanalization at 24 hours. Volume of DWI abnormalities detected on all brain sections = 2.74 mL. nCCD = 68.16. Calculation method for nCCD: The yellow area corresponds to moderately hypoperfused parenchyma (Tmax values between lower and upper Tmax thresholds). The red area corresponds to severely hypoperfused parenchyma (Tmax exceeding the upper threshold). Lower and upper thresholds were defined as the Tmax mean value of the whole contralateral hemisphere (calculated from a brain section located at the centrum semi ovale level with exclusion of skull and ventricles). The lower threshold is contralateral Tmax mean value +2 seconds and the upper threshold is contralateral Tmax mean value +6 seconds. The volume of ipsilateral and supratentorial, moderately (yellow area) or severely (red area), hypoperfused parenchyma is calculated from all brain sections. nCCD = (red area volume/yellow area volume) × (red area volume + yellow area volume).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Values dispersion illustrating the significant correlation between nCCD and baseline NIHSS. The bold dots represent the outliers (Pearson correlation test, positive estimated correlation = 0.40, P = .00089).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Values dispersion illustrating the significant correlation between nCCD and lesional volume on DWI. The bold dots represent the outliers (Pearson correlation test, positive estimated correlation = 0.57, P < .0001.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    nCCD values in patients treated within 3 hours from stroke onset, function of the recanalization status (partial or null versus full). The nCCD is significantly higher in patients who did not achieve full recanalization (P = .007).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Probability of full MCA-M1 recanalization at 24 hours, function of nCCD value in patients treated within 3 hours after stroke onset. The probability of recanalization significantly decreases with the increase of nCCD (P = .021).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Reproducibility of collateral circulation deficit measurements: Interrater

    Expert vs Nonexpert 1Expert vs Nonexpert 2Nonexpert 1 vs Nonexpert 2ICC (95% CI)
    Automatic AIF selectionr20.840.900.940.92 (0.88–0.96)
    Manual AIF selectionr20.770.790.840.88 (0.82–0.92)
    • Note:—ICC indicates intraclass correlation.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Reproducibility of collateral circulation deficit measurements: Intrarater (automatic vs manual AIF selection)

    ExpertNonexpert 1Nonexpert 2
    r20.720.860.85
    ICC (95% CI)0.81 (0.69–0.89)0.82 (0.71–0.89)0.84 (0.74–0.90)
    • Note:—ICC indicates intraclass correlation.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Patient population features

    AgeSex Ratio (M/F)Diabetes (%)Antiplatelet Therapy (%)Stroke Etiology (CE/Atherom/Other) (%)
    Recanalizers + Nonrecanalizers
        Distal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 23)67.5 (15.1)7/1602660.8/8.7/30.4
        Proximal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 26)63 (16.7)8/1811.534.669.2/3.8/26.9
        ICA-MCA M1 occlusion (n = 15)66 (10.2)14/103300/93.3/6.6
        All (n = 64)65 (14.8)30/344.731.250/26.5/23.5
    Recanalizers
        Distal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 19)66 (16.2)7/1202157.9/10.5/31.5
        Proximal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 16)59.8 (20)6/1012.543.768.7/00/31.2
        ICA-MCA M1 occlusion (n = 11)66.7 (10.2)11/0036.300/100/00
        All (n = 46)62.5 (18)13/3342246/28/24
    Nonrecanalizers
        Distal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 4)74.7 (4.6)1/305075/00/25
        Proximal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 10)68 (8.4)2/8102070/10/20
        ICA-MCA M1 occlusion (n = 4)64 (11.5)3/102500/75/25
        All (n = 18)69 (8.88)6/1262856/22/22
    • Note:—Recanalizers = arterial occlusive lesion (AOL) 3 recanalization, ie, full recanalization; nonrecanalizers = AOL 0–2 recanalization, ie, partial or null recanalization. Univariate statistical analysis comparing recanalizers with nonrecanalizers. Results are expressed as mean (standard deviation), ratio, or percentages. CE/Atherom/Other indicates cardioembolic, atheromatous, and other etiology.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Baseline characteristics, nCCD values, and outcome in recanalizers and nonrecanalizers

    TTT (min)NIHSS ScoreDWI Vol (ml)Collateral Circulation Deficit (nCCD)% mRS 0–2/6 at 3 Months
    Recanalizers + Nonrecanalizers
        Distal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 23)181.5 (91.2)8.6 (5.9)13.9 (16.4)73.3 (53.12)78.2/4.3
        Proximal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 26)175.4 (58.4)12 (5.7)16.7 (14)92.1 (51.3)54/3.8
        ICA-MCA M1 occlusion (n = 15)158.86 (65.6)9.86 (5.15)20.77 (14)104.1 (77.3)60/6.6
        All (n = 64)174 (72.7)10 (5.8)17 (14.9)88.17 (59.21)64/4.7
    Recanalizers
        Distal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 19, 82.6%)164.4 (88.7)8 (5.8)12.1 (12.2)68.2 (42.3)89.5/0
        Proximal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 16, 61.5%)158.4 (46.1)11.4 (5.4)13.8 (11.5)92.7 (47.3)68.7/0
        ICA-MCA M1 occlusion (n = 11, 73.3%)155 (71.2)9.27 (5.31)17.6 (11.1)86.6 (69.2)63.6/9.1
        All (n = 46, 71.8%)157.5 (68.2)9.3 (5.7)13 (12)79.6 (46.4)76/2
    Nonrecanalizers
        Distal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 4, 17.4%)262.5 (56.4)11.5 (6.1)22.3 (30.8)97.85 (96.7)25/25
        Proximal MCA-M1 occlusion (n = 10, 38.5%)202.7 (67.8)13.1 (6.3)21.4 (17)91 (59.7)30/10
        ICA-MCA M1 occlusion (n = 4, 26.7%)172 (53.4)11.5 (5)29.5 (19)152 (88.2)50/0
        All (n = 18, 28.1%)209.1 (67.2)a12.4 (5.7)a23.4 (19.9)a106.1 (74.1)33a/11
    • Note:—Recanalizers = arterial occlusive lesion (AOL) 3 recanalization, ie, full recanalization; nonrecanalizers = AOL 0–2 recanalization, ie, partial or null recanalization. Univariate statistical analysis comparing recanalizers versus nonrecanalizers. Student t test or Fisher exact test for comparison of percentages. Results are expressed as mean (standard deviation), ratio, or percentages. mRS indicates modified Rankin Scale; DWI Vol, volume of lesions detected on DWI.

    • ↵a P < 0.05.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 34 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 34, Issue 1
1 Jan 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Perfusion-Weighted Imaging–Derived Collateral Flow Index is a Predictor of MCA M1 Recanalization after IV Thrombolysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
F. Nicoli, P. Lafaye de Micheaux, N. Girard
Perfusion-Weighted Imaging–Derived Collateral Flow Index is a Predictor of MCA M1 Recanalization after IV Thrombolysis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2013, 34 (1) 107-114; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3174

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Perfusion-Weighted Imaging–Derived Collateral Flow Index is a Predictor of MCA M1 Recanalization after IV Thrombolysis
F. Nicoli, P. Lafaye de Micheaux, N. Girard
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2013, 34 (1) 107-114; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3174
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Collateral status and recanalization after endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke
  • Collateral status and recanalization after endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke
  • Clinical prognosis of FLAIR hyperintense arteries in ischaemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Incidence and Predictors of Early Recanalization After Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Acute ischaemia after subarachnoid haemorrhage, relationship with early brain injury and impact on outcome: a prospective quantitative MRI study
  • Time and Diffusion Lesion Size in Major Anterior Circulation Ischemic Strokes
  • Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio Predicts Infarct Progression and Functional Outcome in the DEFUSE 2 Cohort
  • Crossref (35)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Incidence and Predictors of Early Recanalization After Intravenous Thrombolysis
    Pierre Seners, Guillaume Turc, Benjamin Maïer, Jean-Louis Mas, Catherine Oppenheim, Jean-Claude Baron
    Stroke 2016 47 9
  • Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio Predicts Infarct Progression and Functional Outcome in the DEFUSE 2 Cohort
    Jean Marc Olivot, Michael Mlynash, Manabu Inoue, Michael P. Marks, Hayley M. Wheeler, Stephanie Kemp, Matus Straka, Gregory Zaharchuk, Roland Bammer, Maarten G. Lansberg, Gregory W. Albers
    Stroke 2014 45 4
  • Acute ischaemia after subarachnoid haemorrhage, relationship with early brain injury and impact on outcome: a prospective quantitative MRI study
    Jennifer A Frontera, Wamda Ahmed, Victor Zach, Maximo Jovine, Lawrence Tanenbaum, Fatima Sehba, Aman Patel, Joshua B Bederson, Errol Gordon
    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2015 86 1
  • Time and Diffusion Lesion Size in Major Anterior Circulation Ischemic Strokes
    Reza Hakimelahi, Behroze A. Vachha, William A. Copen, Giacomo D.E. Papini, Julian He, Mahmoud M. Higazi, Michael H. Lev, Pamela W. Schaefer, Albert J. Yoo, Lee H. Schwamm, R. Gilberto González
    Stroke 2014 45 10
  • European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study-4: Extending the time for thrombolysis in emergency neurological deficits ECASS-4: ExTEND
    Hemasse Amiri, Erich Bluhmki, Martin Bendszus, Christoph C Eschenfelder, Geoffrey A Donnan, Didier Leys, Carlos Molina, Peter A Ringleb, Peter D Schellinger, Stefan Schwab, Danilo Toni, Nils Wahlgren, Werner Hacke
    International Journal of Stroke 2016 11 2
  • Good collateral circulation predicts favorable outcomes in intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
    X. Leng, L. Lan, L. Liu, T. W. Leung, K. S. Wong
    European Journal of Neurology 2016 23 12
  • Better Collaterals Are Independently Associated With Post-Thrombolysis Recanalization Before Thrombectomy
    Pierre Seners, Pauline Roca, Laurence Legrand, Guillaume Turc, Jean-Philippe Cottier, Tae-Hee Cho, Caroline Arquizan, Serge Bracard, Canan Ozsancak, Wagih Ben Hassen, Olivier Naggara, Stéphanie Lion, Séverine Debiais, Yves Berthezene, Vincent Costalat, Sébastien Richard, Christophe Magni, Jean-Louis Mas, Jean-Claude Baron, Catherine Oppenheim
    Stroke 2019 50 4
  • Cerebral collateral circulation in experimental ischemic stroke
    Elisa Cuccione, Giada Padovano, Alessandro Versace, Carlo Ferrarese, Simone Beretta
    Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine 2016 8 1
  • The role of imaging in acute ischemic stroke
    Elizabeth Tong, Qinghua Hou, Jochen B. Fiebach, Max Wintermark
    Neurosurgical Focus 2014 36 1
  • Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome in Large-Vessel Occlusive Ischemic Strokes
    Michelle P. Lin, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Andrei V. Alexandrov, Jason J. Chang
    International Journal of Stroke 2015 10 4

More in this TOC Section

  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire