Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Progressive Brain Iron Accumulation in Neuroferritinopathy Measured by the Thalamic T2* Relaxation Rate

A. McNeill, G. Gorman, A. Khan, R. Horvath, A.M. Blamire and P.F. Chinnery
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2012, 33 (9) 1810-1813; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3036
A. McNeill
aFrom the Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.M.), University College London Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Hospital Medical School, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Gorman
bInstitute of Human Genetics (G.G., A.K., R.H., P.F.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Khan
bInstitute of Human Genetics (G.G., A.K., R.H., P.F.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Horvath
bInstitute of Human Genetics (G.G., A.K., R.H., P.F.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.M. Blamire
cNewcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre (A.M.B.), Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.F. Chinnery
bInstitute of Human Genetics (G.G., A.K., R.H., P.F.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Neuroferritinopathy is an autosomal dominant extrapyramidal movement disorder, caused by FTL gene mutations. Iron decreases the MR T2* decay time, therefore increasing the R2* (R2* = 1 /T2*), which correlates with brain tissue iron content. 3T structural and quantitative MR imaging assessment of R2* in 10 patients with neuroferritinopathy demonstrated a unique pattern of basal ganglia cavitation involving the substantia nigra in older patients and increasing thalamic R2* signal intensity detectable during 6 months. Increasing R2* signal intensity in the thalamus correlated with progression on a clinical rating scale measuring dystonia severity. Thalamic R2* signal intensity is a clinically useful method of objectively tracking disease progression in this form of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation.

ABBREVIATIONS:

FTL
ferritin, light polypeptide
HDRS
Huntington's Disease Rating Scale
NBIA
neurodegenerative disorders with brain iron accumulation
PKAN
pantothenate kinase–associated neurodegeneration
PLAN
PLA2G6-associated neurodegeneration
R2
T2 relaxation rate
R2*
T2* relaxation rate
UDRS
Unified Dystonia Rating Scale
UHDRS
Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale

Neuroferritinopathy is an autosomal dominant extrapyramidal movement disorder caused by mutations in the FTL gene.1 Seven different mutations have been reported globally, with the 460insA mutation in exon 4 being the most frequent,2 and all causing basal ganglia neurodegeneration with intracellular accumulation of iron and ferritin.3,4 The most common presentation of neuroferritinopathy is chorea in midadult life, with most patients developing dystonia as the disease progresses.2 Neuroferritinopathy belongs to a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of NBIA. There is some clinical overlap between neuroferritinopathy and other NBIA disorders such as PKAN, PLAN, and aceruloplasminemia.5 However, 1.5T brain MR imaging has shown characteristic abnormalities distinguishing neuroferritinopathy from sporadic movement disorders and other genetic subtypes of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. Iron decreases the MR T2 decay time and therefore increases the R2 (R2 = 1 /T2), which correlates with iron content in postmortem brain tissue in healthy controls and in neurologic disease.6⇓⇓⇓⇓–11 The R2*(R2* = 1 /T2*) has been shown to be more sensitive than conventional MR imaging in detecting brain iron accumulation.11 Here we used 3T MR imaging to assess structural changes during a 12-month period on T1 and T2-weighted images and to examine the ability of quantitative R2* (R2* = 1 /T2*) measurement to track iron accumulation in neuroferritinopathy.

Case Series

Ten patients (5 men; mean age, 48.5 years; range, 41–62 years) with the 460insA FTL mutation underwent clinical assessment, by using 2 validated rating scales, the UHDRS for chorea and the UDRS, and MR imaging at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. All studies were approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Patients were scanned in a 3T Achieva system (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) by using a 6-channel head coil. The protocol comprised the following: 1) conventional T1-weighted imaging (TR/TE, 500/15 ms; 30 × 5 mm sections; 400 × 360 acquired matrix; 240 × 192 mm FOV; scan duration, 4.85 minutes) and T2-weighted imaging (TR/TE, 5875/100 ms; TSE factor, 12; 30 × 5 mm sections; 400 × 360 acquired matrix; 240 × 192 mm FOV; scan duration, 2.45 minutes); 2) a dual-echo TSE sequence (TR/TE1/TE2, 2000/18/80 ms; TSE factor, 10; 30 × 5 mm sections; 400 × 349 acquired matrix; 240 × 192 mm FOV; scan duration, 3.9 minutes), which has been used in other iron storage disorders; and 3) a pair of multiecho sequences to map T2 (spin-echo, 5 echoes; TR/TE, 800/20–100 ms; 5 × 5 mm sections; 256 × 205 acquired matrix; 230 × 162 mm FOV; scan duration, 2.0 minutes) and T2*-weighted imaging (multi-gradient echo; TR, 550 ms; 20 echoes; 1.3-ms spacing; 5 × 5 mm sections; 256 × 201 acquired matrix; 230 × 230 mm FOV; scan duration, 1.9 minutes).

All sections were acquired in an axial-oblique orientation aligned along the axis of the corpus callosum (genu to splenium). Image series were fit by using standard single exponential fitting to create quantitative maps of R2 and R2*. Data were available for comparative purposes from 6 healthy individuals (5 women; mean age, 74 years; range, 68–81 years) scanned by using the same protocol. At follow-up at 6 and 12 months, all previous scans were available to aid with repositioning. Following collection of scout scans, images were carefully positioned by using anatomic landmarks identified on the current and previous scans.

T1 and T2 anatomic scans were rated independently by 2 investigators (A.K. and A.M.). Four target ROIs were manually defined on the anatomic images (posterior rim of the putamen, globus pallidus, caudate, and thalamus) and applied to the quantitative R2* maps to determine mean relaxation times in each area. Figure 1 illustrates how each ROI was defined anatomically. These ROIs are known to be affected in neuroferritinopathy. We did not study other regions, to minimize the chance of false-positive associations through multiple significance testing. R2* levels in each ROI were measured independently by 2 investigators (A.K. at baseline, A.M. at baseline and the second and third time points) by using MRIcro software (http://www.cabiatl.com/mricro). For each ROI, R2* was measured on the right and left sides on 2 axial MR imaging sections, and the mean was calculated. The mean R2* in each brain region was plotted against dystonia and chorea severity scores for each time point. The Pearson correlation (Graphpad, Instat; http://www.graphpad.com/welcome.htm) was used to examine relationships between R2* in the ROI and disease severity scores at baseline. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; SPSS, Chicago, Illinois) was used to examine any significant alterations in R2* from the ROIs with time, and any significant changes in disease severity scores.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Delineation of ROIs on T2* images. A, Red areas demonstrate delineation of the caudate nucleus. B, Red areas demonstrate delineation of the posterior putamen rim. C, Red areas demonstrate delineation of the thalamus.

Results

Clinical Features and Qualitative Imaging

The Table summarizes the demographic details and clinical and radiologic features of the patients studied. Conventional T1- and T2-weighted 3T MR imaging scans demonstrated abnormalities characteristic of neuroferritinopathy (Table). Cases 2 and 4 had areas of medial hyperintensity with surrounding hypointensity in the globus pallidus (Fig 2A), constituting an atypical “eye-of-the-tiger” sign. Novel imaging features of substantia nigra cavitation and dentate nucleus cavitation were identified in cases 10 and 9, respectively (Fig 2B, -C). Older patients generally had more extensive and severe cavitation (Table). All patients older than 50 years of age had cavitation of the globus pallidus and putamen. Additionally 2 patients older than 50 years had bilateral lesions of the substantia nigra, 1 patient older than 50 years had bilateral cavitations of the dentate nucleus, and 1 patient older than 50 years had bilateral cavitations of the head of the caudate nucleus. Only 2 patients younger than 50 years old had fully developed cavitation of the globus pallidus and putamen, and none had substantia nigra, dentate nucleus, or caudate nuclei involvement. There were no discernible structure changes on conventional MR imaging scans obtained 12 months apart.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Demographic, clinical, and T2* MRI features of the neuroferritinopathy cohort

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

T2* MR imaging findings in neuroferritinopathy. A, Atypical eye-of-the-tiger sign in a 42-year-old woman. Note the area of medial hyperintensity with surrounding hypointensity in the globus pallidus (arrow). B, Cavitation of the substantia nigra in a 58-year-old man (arrow). C, Cavitation of the dentate nucleus in a 62-year-old man (arrow).

Baseline Quantitative Imaging.

At baseline, the thalamic R2* correlated positively with UDRS (r2 = 0.20, P = .0036) but not HDRS (r2 = 0.028, P = .29) and was markedly different from that of controls (data not shown; range, 18.8–27.2 seconds−1, P = .0001). The R2* from the putamen rim correlated inversely with both disease severity scores (UDRS: r2 = 0.16, P = .0082; HDRS: r2 = 0.42, P = .041). The lower R2* scores from the putamen rim in those with high disease-severity scores were associated with cavitation of the putamen. R2* from the caudate nuclei did not correlate with disease rating scores (UDRS: r2 = 0.016, P = .74; HDRS: r2 = 0.166, P = .27). The globus pallidus was found to be extensively cavitated in 5/10 cases and involved by an atypical eye-of-the-tiger sign in 2/10 cases. The associated parenchymal loss prevented baseline or serial assessment of R2* across the whole study group.

Serial Quantitative Imaging.

A 1-way repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted to compare the thalamic R2* scores for the whole group (ie, 40 measurements for each time point being 4 measurements of thalamic R2* for each of 10 patients) at time 1 (baseline), time 2 (6 months), and time 3 (12 months). The means and standard error of thalamic R2* at each time point for the whole group are presented in Fig 3. Thalamic R2* increased with time (Wilks λ = 0.63, F(2, 38) = 11.03, P < .0005; multivariate partial η squared = 0.37), as did the UDRS (Wilks λ = 0.22, F(2, 8) = 14.48, P < .002; multivariate partial η squared = 0.78). The relationship between changes in R2* and UDRS with time was investigated by using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. There was a moderate positive correlation between the 2 variables (r = 0.44, P = .02). There was no alteration in R2* values for the putamen (Wilks λ = 0.97, F(2,23) = 0.27, P = .76; multivariate θ squared = 0.024), caudate (Wilks λ = 0.9, F(2,10) = 0.036, P = .96; multivariate θ squared = 0.002), or HDRS (Wilks λ = 0.35, F(2, 8) = 1.20, P = .35; multivariate partial η squared = 0.23) during the 3 time points.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Serial quantitative MR imaging demonstrates rising thalamic R2* during 3 time points. Thalamic R2* at each time point represents a mean value for the whole group (40 measurements for each time point as 4 measurements for each of 10 patients). A 1-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed and demonstrated a significant rise in thalamic R2* with time (Wilks λ = 0.63, F (2, 38) = 11.03, P < .0005; multivariate partial η squared = 0.37). Error bars represent standard error of the mean for each time point. Representative colorized serial MR imaging scans from a single individual are presented for each time point. Note the increasing intensity of R2* signal intensity in the thalamus (arrow) during each time point.

Discussion

Although there was no absolute correlation between the extent of basal ganglia cavitation and age or disease duration, individuals older than 50 years of age or with disease duration >10 years tended to have more severe basal ganglia cavitation. However, serial imaging during a 12-month period did not reveal any progressive structural changes such as development or enlargement of cavitated areas. Gross structural change, therefore, developed over decades in neuroferritinopathy, being a marker of late disease. This feature supports the need to develop quantitative imaging markers that track short-term disease progression as a prerequisite for treatment studies. Despite the cavitation in late-stage neuroferritinopathy, we observed that thalamic R2* increases with time in patients with neuroferritinopathy. The thalamus is hypointense in early neuroferritinopathy, representing likely iron accumulation in this structure early in the disease.5 There is no evidence that the rate of iron accumulation is different in early- or late-stage neuroferritinopathy. We thus propose specifically that measuring thalamic R2* may be used as a proxy measure of brain iron accumulation throughout the natural history of neuroferritinopathy.

Applying 3T imaging for the first time revealed novel neuroradiologic features of neuroferritinopathy. In case 10, there was T2 hyperintensity of the substantia nigra with bilateral cavitation observed on T1. This probably reflects cystic degeneration but needs neuropathologic confirmation. A review of PubMed and MEDLINE did not reveal any other reports of substantia nigra cavitation, and it is possible that this imaging feature may prove to be highly characteristic of neuroferritinopathy. In case 9, there was cavitation of the dentate nucleus.

Quantitative 3T imaging with the R2* signal intensity revealed a correlation between thalamic iron levels and dystonia severity scores, but not chorea scores. By contrast, iron levels in the putamen rim demonstrated an inverse relationship with disease severity, with high R2* values associated with low chorea scores and lower R2* values, with high chorea scores. That lower R2* scores were observed in the putamen rim in patients with longer disease duration and higher chorea scores is probably due to necrosis of putaminal tissue, with loss of iron-rich cellular structures. There was no correlation between R2* and disease severity scores for the caudate nucleus, probably reflecting distortion of the MR imaging signal intensity by air in the sphenoidal sinus.

Serial measurements of brain R2* demonstrated increasing R2* in the thalamus, but no significant change in R2* values for the putamen rim or caudate nucleus. Given that R2* reflects brain iron content in postmortem samples and in vivo6⇓⇓⇓–10, the progressive increase in thalamic R2* is likely to reflect ongoing iron accumulation in neuroferritinopathy, detectable during a 6- to 12-month period. Moreover, the correlation of thalamic R2* with dystonia severity scores supports the use of quantitative MR imaging both to monitor natural history and to study the effects of any treatment aimed at modulating brain iron stores. The lack of correlation between thalamic R2* and chorea severity scores likely reflects the relative insensitivity of the chorea scale (UHDRS) to detect small changes during short periods of time in a movement disorder that is more complex than Huntington disease. Case reports indicate that brain iron accumulation can occur in patients with presymptomatic NBIA,5 and clearly, the relationship between brain iron accumulation, neuronal injury, and clinical symptoms is not straightforward. In PKAN and PLAN, it is thought that iron deposition occurs as a secondary process.5,11 However, in neuroferritinopathy, the primary genetic defect directly disrupts iron metabolism, and there is pathologic evidence that ferritin mutations lead to excessive iron deposition in the brain, causing oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, and cell death.3,4

On MR imaging of the brain in neuroferritinopathy, hypointensities, representing probable iron deposition, precede evidence of atrophy and tissue necrosis.5 Thus, neurodegeneration and clinical symptoms occur once, as yet undefined, toxic threshold of iron accumulation is reached. Therefore, iron accumulation in neuroferritinopathy represents a primary factor driving the disease process, rather than simply accumulation with time. It is, therefore, clinically and scientifically relevant to measure brain iron in neuroferritinopathy as a proxy measure of disease progression in both the presymptomatic state and in clinically manifest disease. This will help to identify a putative toxicity threshold in presymptomatic disease and, because R2* correlates with clinical severity scales, to track disease progression in those clinically affected.

The R2* mapping sequence used in our study was not part of a routine protocol but was available directly on the scanner. The sequence took only 2.5 minutes to acquire, making it an acceptable duration for use in a specialist research setting for interventional and natural history studies. T2*-weighted imaging is routinely used to enhance areas of iron deposition, with other sensitive variations such as SWI being increasingly commercially available and capable of providing high contrast.12 Data processing to mitigate or minimize gross susceptibility effects remains a challenge to extract quantitative information either from R2* mapping or SWI, but is being addressed.12

Footnotes

  • Author roles: 1) research project: A) conception, B) organization, C) execution; 2) statistical analysis: A) design, B) execution, C) review and critique; 3) manuscript: A) writing of the first draft, B) review and critique. Alisdair McNeill: 1C, 2B, 3A, 3B; Grainne Gorman: 1B, 2B, 3A, 3B; Asif Khan: 1C, 2B; Andy Blamire: 1C, 2A, 3B; Patrick F. Chinnery: 1B, 3A, 3B; Rita Horvath: 1C, 2B, 3B.

  • Disclosures: Alisdair McNeill—UNRELATED: Employment: UK Medical Research Council Fellowship. Grainne Gorman—RELATED: Grant: Newcastle Healthcare Charity, Comments: The funding for this study was secured by Professors A. Blamire and P. Chinnery, on behalf of Newcastle University, both authors of this article. Ahmed Khan—RELATED: Grant: Newcastle Healthcare Charity, Comments: to pay for scans. Andrew M. Blamire—RELATED: Grant: Newcastle Healthcare Charity, Comments: local charitable foundation, which funded the MRI scans presented in this article.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Curtis AJ,
    2. Fey C,
    3. Morris CM,
    4. et al
    . Mutation in the gene encoding ferritin light chain polypeptide causes adult onset autosomal dominant basal ganglia disease. Nat Genet 2001; 28: 350– 54
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chinnery PF,
    2. Crompton DE,
    3. Birchall D,
    4. et al
    . Clinical features and natural history of neuroferritinopathy caused by the FTL1 460insA mutation. Brain 2007; 130: 110– 19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mancuso M,
    2. Davidzon G,
    3. Kurlan RM,
    4. et al
    . Hereditary ferritinopathy: a novel mutation, its cellular pathology, and pathogenetic insights. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2005; 64: 280– 94
    PubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vidal R,
    2. Ghetti B,
    3. Takao M,
    4. et al
    . Intracellular ferritin accumulation in neuronal and extra-neuronal tissues characterises a neurodegenerative disorder associated with a mutation in the ferritin light polypeptide gene. J Neuropath Exp Neurol 2004; 63: 363– 80
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. McNeill A,
    2. Birchall D,
    3. Hayflick SY,
    4. et al
    . T2* and FSE MRI distinguish four subtypes of neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. Neurology 2008; 70: 1614– 19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. House MJ,
    2. St Pierre TG,
    3. Kowdley KV,
    4. et al
    . Correlation of proton transverse relaxation rates (R2) with iron concentrations in postmortem brain tissue from Alzheimer's disease patients. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 172– 80
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gelman N,
    2. Gorell JM,
    3. Barker PB,
    4. et al
    . MR imaging of human brain at 3.0 T: preliminary report on transverse relaxation rates and relation to estimated iron content. Radiology 1999; 210: 759– 67
    PubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jensen JH,
    2. Szulc K,
    3. Hu C,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic field correlation as a measure of iron-generated magnetic field inhomogeneities in the brain. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 481– 85
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ordidge RJ,
    2. Gorell JM,
    3. Deniau JC,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of relative brain iron concentrations using T2-weighted and T2*-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 335– 41
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Aquino D,
    2. Bizzi A,
    3. Grisoli M,
    4. et al
    . Age-related iron deposition in the basal ganglia: quantitative analysis in healthy subjects. Radiology 2009; 1: 165– 72
  11. 11.↵
    1. Szumowski J,
    2. Bas E,
    3. Gaarder K,
    4. et al
    . Measurement of brain iron distribution in Hallevorden-Spatz syndrome. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 482– 89
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mittal S,
    2. Wu Z,
    3. Neelavalli J,
    4. et al
    . Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 232– 52
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received October 21, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision December 2, 2011.
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 9
1 Oct 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Progressive Brain Iron Accumulation in Neuroferritinopathy Measured by the Thalamic T2* Relaxation Rate
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. McNeill, G. Gorman, A. Khan, R. Horvath, A.M. Blamire, P.F. Chinnery
Progressive Brain Iron Accumulation in Neuroferritinopathy Measured by the Thalamic T2* Relaxation Rate
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2012, 33 (9) 1810-1813; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3036

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Progressive Brain Iron Accumulation in Neuroferritinopathy Measured by the Thalamic T2* Relaxation Rate
A. McNeill, G. Gorman, A. Khan, R. Horvath, A.M. Blamire, P.F. Chinnery
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2012, 33 (9) 1810-1813; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3036
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Case Series
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Integrated Short-TE and Hadamard-edited Multi-Sequence (ISTHMUS) for Advanced MRS
  • Crossref (19)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders
    Roberta J Ward, Fabio A Zucca, Jeff H Duyn, Robert R Crichton, Luigi Zecca
    The Lancet Neurology 2014 13 10
  • Cerebral Iron Deposition in Neurodegeneration
    Petr Dusek, Tim Hofer, Jan Alexander, Per M. Roos, Jan O. Aaseth
    Biomolecules 2022 12 5
  • Copper, Iron, and Manganese Toxicity in Neuropsychiatric Conditions
    Beata Tarnacka, Anna Jopowicz, Maria Maślińska
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021 22 15
  • The Presence and Role of Iron in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Imaging Perspective
    Eric J. Nisenbaum, Dmitry S. Novikov, Yvonne W. Lui
    Journal of Neurotrauma 2014 31 4
  • The effect of lead exposure on brain iron homeostasis and the expression of DMT1/FP1 in the brain in developing and aged rats
    Gaochun Zhu, Guangqin Fan, Chang Feng, Yanshu Li, Ying Chen, Fankun Zhou, Guihua Du, Huan Jiao, Zhenghua Liu, Xinlan Xiao, Fen Lin, Ji Yan
    Toxicology Letters 2013 216 2-3
  • Metal Related Neurodegenerative Disease
    Michael J. Keogh, Christopher M. Morris, Patrick F. Chinnery
    2013 110
  • Brain iron takes off: a new propeller protein links neurodegeneration with autophagy
    Rita Horvath
    Brain 2013 136 6
  • Dietary lipophilic iron accelerates regional brain iron-load in C57BL6 mice
    Douglas G. Peters, Carson J. Purnell, Michael P. Haaf, Qing X. Yang, James R. Connor, Mark D. Meadowcroft
    Brain Structure and Function 2018 223 3
  • Neuropathological and biochemical investigation of Hereditary Ferritinopathy cases with ferritin light chain mutation: Prominent protein aggregation in the absence of major mitochondrial or oxidative stress
    M. Kurzawa‐Akanbi, M. Keogh, E. Tsefou, L. Ramsay, M. Johnson, S. Keers, L. WSA Ochieng, A. McNair, P. Singh, A. Khan, A. Pyle, G. Hudson, P. G. Ince, J. Attems, J. Burn, P. F. Chinnery, C. M. Morris
    Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 2021 47 1
  • Quantitative susceptibility mapping in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: automatic quantification of the magnetic susceptibility in the subcortical nuclei
    Sadegh Ghaderi, Farzad Fatehi, Sanjay Kalra, Sana Mohammadi, Seyed Amir Hossein Batouli
    Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration 2025 26 1-2

More in this TOC Section

  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire