Hemodynamic Changes in Patients with Arteriovenous Malformations Assessed Using High-Resolution 3D Radial Phase-Contrast MR Angiography

References

1. 1.↵
   1. da Costa L,
   2. Wallace C,
   3. ter Brugge K,
   4. et al

   . The natural history and predictive features of hemorrhage from brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke, 2009;40:100–05

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Stapf C,
   2. Mast H,
   3. Sciacca R,
   4. et al

   . Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 2006;66:1350–55

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Young WL

   . Arteriovenous malformations clinical and genetic risk stratification. Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Seattle, Washington, June 6, 2011
4. 4.↵
   1. Graf C,
   2. Perret G

   . Bleeding from cerebral arteriovenous malformations as part of their natural history. J Neurosurgery 1983;58:331–37

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Laakso A,
   2. Dashti R,
   3. Juvela S,
   4. et al

   . Risk of hemorrhage in patients with untreated Spetzler-Martin grade IV and V arteriovenous malformations: a long-term follow-up study in 63 patients. Neurosurgery 2011;68:372–78; discussion 378

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Ondra SL,
   2. Troupp H

   . The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24-year follow-up assessment. J Neurosurg 1990;73:387–91

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Hashimoto T,
   2. Emala C,
   3. Joshi S,
   4. et al

   . Abnormal pattern of Tie-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor expression in human cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 2000;47:910–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Kamiya A,
   2. Togawa T

   . Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery. Am J Physiol 1980;239:H14–21

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Girerd X,
   2. London G,
   3. Boutouyrie P,
   4. et al

   . Remodeling of the radial artery in response to a chronic increase in shear stress. Hypertension 1996;27:799–803

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Malek A,
    2. Alper S,
    3. Izumo S

    . Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035–42

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Pawlikowska L,
    3. Yao J,
    4. et al

    . Interleukin-6 involvement in brain arteriovenous malformations. Ann Neurol 2006;59:72–80

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Walker J,
    2. Su H,
    3. Shen F,
    4. et al

    . Arteriovenous malformation in the adult mouse brain resembling the human disease. American Neurological Association 2011;69:954–62
13. 13.↵
    1. Corti P,
    2. Young S,
    3. Chen C,
    4. et al

    . Interaction between ALK1 and blood flow in the development of arteriovenous malformations. Development 2011;138:1573–82

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Stalder AF,
    2. Russe MF,
    3. Frydrychowicz A,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1218–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Johnson K,
    2. Lum D,
    3. Turski P,
    4. et al

    . Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1329–36

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Wu Y,
    2. Chang W,
    3. Johnson K,
    4. et al

    . Fast whole brain 4D contrast enhanced MR angiography with velocity encoding using undersampled radial acquisition and highly constrained projection reconstruction (HYPRFlow): image quality assessment in volunteer subjects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E47–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Velikina JV,
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Wu Y,
    4. et al

    . PC HYPR flow: a technique for rapid imaging of contrast dynamics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:447–56

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Wetzel S,
    2. Meckel S,
    3. Frydrychwocz A,
    4. et al

    . In vivo assessment and visualization of intracranial arterial hemodynamics with flow sensitized 4D MR imaging at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuoradiol 2007;28:433–38
19. 19.↵
    1. Markl M,
    2. Wegent F,
    3. Zech T,
    4. et al

    . In-vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circulation 2010;3:647–55
20. 20.↵
    1. Spetzler R,
    2. Martin N

    . A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Lawton M,
    2. Kim H,
    3. McCulloch C,
    4. et al

    . A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery. Neurosurgery 2010;66:702–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Skjøth-Rasmussen J,
    2. Roed H,
    3. Ohlhues L,
    4. et al

    . Complications following linear accelerator based stereotactic radiation for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77:542–47

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Buis D,
    2. Meiker O,
    3. van den Berg R,
    4. et al

    . Clinical outcome after repeated radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations. Radiother Oncol 2010;95:205–56
24. 24.↵
    1. Weber W,
    2. Kis B,
    3. Siekmann R,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with Onyx: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:371–77

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Taylor CL,
    2. Dutton K,
    3. Rappard G,
    4. et al

    . Complications of preoperative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2004;100:810–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Starke R,
    2. Komotar R,
    3. Otten M,
    4. et al

    . Adjuvant embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate in the treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Stroke 2009;40:2783–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Morgan M,
    2. Johnston I,
    3. Hallinan J,
    4. et al

    . Complications of surgery for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. J Neurosurg 1993;78:176–82

    PubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Hartmann A,
    2. Stapf C,
    3. Hofmeister C,
    4. et al

    . Determinants of neurological outcome after surgery for brain arteriovenous malformation. Stroke 2000;31:2361–64

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Wedderburn C,
    2. Beijnum J,
    3. Bhattacharya J,
    4. et al

    . Outcome after interventional or conservative management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: a prospective, population-based cohort study. Lancet 2007;7:223–30
30. 30.↵
    1. Fiehler J,
    2. Stapf C

    . ARUBA – beating natural history in unruptured brain AVMs by intervention. Neuroradiology 2008;50:465–67

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Mohr J,
    2. Moskowitz A,
    3. Stapf C,
    4. et al

    . The ARUBA trial: current status, future hopes. Stroke 2010;41:537–40

    CrossRef
32. 32.↵
    1. Rosseti S,
    2. Svendsen P

    . Shear stress in cerebral arteries supplying arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995;137:138–45

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Wood N,
    2. Weston S,
    3. Kilner P,
    4. et al

    . Combined MR imaging and CFD simulation of flow in the human descending aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:699–713

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Chang W,
    2. Landgraf B,
    3. Kecskemeti S,
    4. et al

    . Velocity measurements in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using 3D-radial PC HYPRFlow: comparison with transcranial Doppler sonography and 2D phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:54–59

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Jiang J,
    2. Johnson K,
    3. Valen-Sendstad K,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of aneurismal hemodynamics between 4-D accelerated phase-contrast MR angiography and computational fluid dynamics simulations: initial experience in a canine aneurysm model. Presented at the American Society of Mechanical Engineering Summer Bio-Engineering Conference, Naples, FL, June 17, 2010
36. 36.↵
    1. Hope MD,
    2. Purcell DD,
    3. Hope TA,
    4. et al

    . Complete intracranial arterial and venous blood flow evaluation with 4D flow MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:362–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Gu T,
    2. Korosec F,
    3. Block W,
    4. et al

    . PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Moftakhar R,
    2. Aagaard-Kienitz B,
    3. Johnson K,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive measurement of intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow pattern using phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1710–14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Turk AS,
    2. Johnson KM,
    3. Lum D,
    4. et al

    . Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:111–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text