Vertebral Endplate Changes Are Not Associated with Chronic Low Back Pain among Southern European Subjects: A Case Control Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Waddell G

   . The Back Pain Revolution. London, UK: Churchill-Livingstone; 2004:1– 61
2. 2.↵
   1. Modic MT,
   2. Steinberg PM,
   3. Ross JS,
   4. et al

   . Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 166: 193– 99

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Rahme R,
   2. Moussa R

   . The Modic vertebral endplate and marrow changes: pathologic significance and relation to low back pain and segmental instability of the lumbar spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29: 838– 42

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Kuisma M,
   2. Karppinen J,
   3. Niinimaki J,
   4. et al

   . Modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies: prevalence and association with low back and sciatic pain among middle-aged male workers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 1116– 22

   CrossRef
5. 5.↵
   1. Merskey HB,
   2. Bogduk N

   1. Merskey HB,
   2. Bogduk N

   . Detailed descriptions of pain syndromes. In: Merskey HB, Bogduk N , eds. Classification of Chronic Pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994: 39– 58
6. 6.↵
   1. Jensen TS,
   2. Bendix T,
   3. Sorensen JS,
   4. et al

   . Characteristics and natural course of vertebral endplate signal (Modic) changes in the Danish general population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009; 10: 81
7. 7.↵
   1. Kjaer P,
   2. Leboeuf-Yde C,
   3. Korsholm L,
   4. et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1173– 80

   CrossRef
8. 8.↵
   1. Weishaupt D,
   2. Zanetti M,
   3. Hodler J,
   4. et al

   . Painful lumbar disk derangement: relevance of endplate abnormalities at MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 218: 420– 27

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Chung CB,
   2. Vande Berg BC,
   3. Tavernier T,
   4. et al

   . End plate marrow changes in the asymptomatic lumbosacral spine: frequency, distribution and correlation with age and degenerative changes. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33: 399– 404

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Kanayama M,
    2. Togawa D,
    3. Takahashi C,
    4. et al

    . Cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging study of lumbar disc degeneration in 200 healthy individuals. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 501– 07

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Albert HB,
    2. Briggs AM,
    3. Kent P,
    4. et al

    . The prevalence of MRI-defined spinal pathoanatomies and their association with Modic changes in individuals seeking care for low back pain. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 1355– 62

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Arana E,
    2. Kovacs FM,
    3. Royuela A,
    4. et al

    . Modic changes and associated features in Southern European chronic low back pain patients. Spine J 2011; 11: 402– 11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Jensen TS,
    2. Karppinen J,
    3. Sorensen JS,
    4. et al

    . Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 1407– 22

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Jensen TS,
    2. Kjaer P,
    3. Korsholm L,
    4. et al

    . Predictors of new vertebral endplate signal (Modic) changes in the general population. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 129– 35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Pearson AM,
    2. Tosteson TD,
    3. Weinstein JN

    . The importance of study design in the spine literature. Semin Spine Surg 2009; 21: 202– 09

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    1. Kuorinka I,
    2. Jonsson B,
    3. Kilbom A,
    4. et al

    . Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 1987; 18: 233– 37

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Huskisson EC

    . Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1127– 31

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Kovacs FM,
    2. Llobera J,
    3. Gil Del Real MT,
    4. et al

    . Validation of the Spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 538–42

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    1. Kovacs FM,
    2. Royuela A,
    3. Jensen TS,
    4. et al

    . Agreement in the interpretation of magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine. Acta Radiol 2009; 50: 497– 506

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Arana E,
    2. Royuela A,
    3. Kovacs FM,
    4. et al

    . Agreement in the interpretation of 1.5T magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group Classification form. Radiology 2010; 254: 809– 17

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Arana E,
    2. Kovacs FM,
    3. Royuela A,
    4. et al

    . The influence of nomenclature in the interpretation of lumbar disk contour on MRI: a comparison of the agreement using the Combined Task Force and the Nordic nomenclatures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1143– 48

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Jensen TS,
    2. Sorensen JS,
    3. Kjaer P

    . Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of vertebral endplate signal (Modic) changes in the lumbar spine: the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification. Acta Radiol 2007; 48: 748– 54

    FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Pfirrmann CW,
    2. Metzdorf A,
    3. Zanetti M,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 1873– 78

    CrossRef
24. 24.↵
    1. Videman T,
    2. Battie MC,
    3. Parent E,
    4. et al

    . Progression and determinants of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging measures of lumbar disc degeneration: a five-year follow-up of adult male monozygotic twins. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 1484– 90

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Belsley DA

    . Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991 tern Med 2011; 154: 181– 89
26. 26.↵
    1. Harrell FE

    . Regression Modeling Strategies with Applications to Linear Models, Logistics Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001
27. 27.↵
    1. Jim JJ,
    2. Noponen-Hietala N,
    3. Cheung KM,
    4. et al

    . The TRP2 allele of COL9A2 is an age-dependent risk factor for the development and severity of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 2735– 42

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    1. Battie MC,
    2. Videman T,
    3. Kaprio J,
    4. et al

    . The Twin Spine Study: contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration. Spine J 2009; 9: 47– 59

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Quattrocchi CC,
    2. Alexandre AM,
    3. Pepa GM,
    4. et al

    . Modic changes: anatomy, pathophysiology and clinical correlation. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011; 108: 49– 53

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Lim CH,
    2. Jee WH,
    3. Son BC,
    4. et al

    . Discogenic lumbar pain: association with MR imaging and CT discography. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54: 431– 37

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Fayad F,
    2. Lefevre-Colau MM,
    3. Rannou F,
    4. et al

    . Relation of inflammatory Modic changes to intradiscal steroid injection outcome in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 925– 31

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Jarvik JG,
    2. Hollingworth W,
    3. Heagerty PJ,
    4. et al

    . Three-year incidence of low back pain in an initially asymptomatic cohort: clinical and imaging risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1541– 49

    CrossRef
33. 33.↵
    1. Keller A,
    2. Boyle E,
    3. Skog TA,
    4. et al

    . Are Modic changes prognostic for recovery in a cohort of patients with non-specific low back pain? Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 418– 24

    PubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Kovacs FM,
    2. Fernandez C,
    3. Cordero A,
    4. et al

    . Non-specific low back pain in primary care in the Spanish National Health Service: a prospective study on clinical outcomes and determinants of management. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 57
35. 35.↵
    1. Andersson GB

    . Epidemiologic features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999; 354: 581– 85

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. van Tulder MW,
    2. Koes BW,
    3. Bouter LM

    . A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 1995; 62: 233– 40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Endean A,
    2. Palmer KT,
    3. Coggon D

    . Potential of magnetic resonance imaging findings to refine case definition for mechanical low back pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 160– 69

    CrossRef
38. 38.↵
    1. Chou R,
    2. Qaseem A,
    3. Owens DK,
    4. et al

    . Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 181– 89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Chou R,
    2. Qaseem A,
    3. Snow V,
    4. et al

    . Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 478– 91

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    1. Chou R,
    2. Loeser JD,
    3. Owens DK,
    4. et al

    . Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1066– 77

    CrossRef
41. 41.↵
    1. Martin BI,
    2. Mirza SK,
    3. Comstock BA,
    4. et al

    . Are lumbar spine reoperation rates falling with greater use of fusion surgery and new surgical technology? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 2119– 26

    CrossRef
42. 42.↵
    1. Wilson-MacDonald H,
    2. Fairbank J,
    3. Frost H,
    4. et al

    . The MRC Spine Stabilization Trial: surgical methods, outcomes, costs, and complications of surgical stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: 2334– 40

    CrossRef
43. 43.↵
    American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery “Notification”: www.spine.org/Documents/BCBSNC_Lumbar_Fusion_Response121510.pdf. Published December 15, 2010. Updated December 15, 2010. Accessed June 30, 2011
44. 44.↵
    1. Roland M,
    2. van Tulder M

    . Should radiologists change the way they report plain radiography of the spine? Lancet 1998; 352: 229– 30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 45.↵
    1. Carragee EJ,
    2. Alamin TF,
    3. Miller JL,
    4. et al

    . Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain. Spine J 2005; 5: 24– 35

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Weishaupt D,
    2. Zanetti M,
    3. Hodler J,
    4. et al

    . MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology 1998; 209: 661– 66

    PubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    1. Carrino JA,
    2. Lurie JD,
    3. Tosteson ANA,
    4. et al

    . Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings. Radiology 2009; 250: 161– 70

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Jarvik JG,
    2. Deyo RA

    . Moderate versus mediocre: the reliability of spine MR data interpretations. Radiology 2009; 250: 15– 17

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Benoist M

    . The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the “medical” articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 3– 10

    CrossRefPubMed