Cerecyte Coil Trial: Procedural Safety and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RSC,
   3. Stratton I,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267– 74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu L-M,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366: 809– 17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Campi A,
   2. Ramzi N,
   3. Molyneux AJ,
   4. et al

   . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007; 38: 1538– 44

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RSC,
   3. Birks J,
   4. et al

   . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 427– 33

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   InferMed. Macro electronic data capture. http://www.infermed.com. Accessed 31 Jan 2011
6. 6.↵
   1. Linfante I,
   2. DeLeo MJ,
   3. Gounis MJ III.,
   4. et al

   . Cerecyte versus platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: packing attenuation and clinical and angiographic midterm results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1496– 501

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Bendszus M,
   2. Solymosi L

   . Cerecyte coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a preliminary clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 2053– 57

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Bendszus M,
   2. Bartsch AJ,
   3. Solymosi L

   . Endovascular occlusion of aneurysms using a new bioactive coil: a matched pair analysis with bare platinum coils. Stroke 2007; 38: 2855– 57. Epub 2007 Aug 23

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Butteriss D,
   2. Gholkar A,
   3. Mitra D,
   4. et al

   . Single-center experience of Cerecyte coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and early follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 53– 56

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Veznedaroglu E,
    2. Koebbe CJ,
    3. Siddiqui A,
    4. et al

    . Initial experience with bioactive Cerecyte detachable coils: impact on reducing recurrence rates. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 1516– 24

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Castro E,
    2. Villoria F,
    3. Castaño C,
    4. et al

    . Spanish registry for embolization of small intracranial aneurysms with Cerecyte coils (SPAREC) study: early experience and mid-term follow-up results. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14: 375– 84

    PubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Leonardi M,
    2. Dall'olio M,
    3. Vasquez OO,
    4. et al

    . Preliminary experience of Cerecyte coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14: 285– 92. Epub 2008 Oct 8

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Geyik S,
    2. Ertugral O,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of bioactive coils and bare platinum coils for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a matched pair analysis. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 709– 13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Ross IB,
    2. Dhillon GS

    . Complications of endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Surg Neurol 2005; 64: 12– 19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Cloft HJ,
    2. Kallmes DF

    . Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with Guglielmi detachable coils: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1706– 09

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Henkes H,
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Weber W,
    4. et al

    . Endovascular coil occlusion of 1811 intracranial aneurysms: early angiographic and clinical results. Neurosurgery 2004; 54: 268– 80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. van Rooij WJ,
    2. Sluzewski M,
    3. Beute GN,
    4. et al

    . Procedural complications of coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: incidence and risk factors in a consecutive series of 681 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1498– 501

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Brilstra EH,
    2. Rinkel GJ,
    3. van der Graaf Y,
    4. et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke 1999; 30: 470– 76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Viñuela F,
    2. Duckwiler G,
    3. Mawad M

    . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997; 86: 3:475– 82
20. 20.↵
    1. Marchan EM,
    2. Sekula RF Jr.,
    3. Ku A,
    4. et al

    . Hydrogel coil–related delayed hydrocephalus in patients with unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2008; 109: 2:186– 90