Strengthening the Argument for Rapid Brain MR Imaging: Estimation of Reduction in Lifetime Attributable Risk of Developing Fatal Cancer in Children with Shunted Hydrocephalus by Instituting a Rapid Brain MR Imaging Protocol in Lieu of Head CT

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Arch ME,
   2. Frush DP

   . Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:611–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Goske MJ,
   2. Applegate KE,
   3. Boylan J,
   4. et al

   . The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:273–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the ICRP. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2008;37
4. 4.↵
   Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII – Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006
5. 5.↵
   ImPACT. ImPACT scan Web site. http://www.impactscan.org. Accessed April 15, 2011
6. 6.↵
   International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 1991;21
7. 7.↵
   1. Berrington de González A,
   2. Mahesh M,
   3. Kim KP,
   4. et al

   . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2071–77

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Smith-Bindman R,
   2. Lipson J,
   3. Marcus R,
   4. et al

   . Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078–86

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Linton OW,
   2. Mettler FA Jr.

   . National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:321–29

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. White KS

    . Invited article: helical/spiral CT scanning: a pediatric radiology perspective. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26:5–14

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    U.S. Census Bureau. State and County QuickFacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html. Accessed April 7, 2011
12. 12.↵
    1. Galanski M,
    2. Nagel HD,
    3. Stamm G

    . Paediatric CT exposure practice in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of a nationwide survey in 2005/06. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; 2006
13. 13.↵
    1. Brenner D,
    2. Elliston C,
    3. Hall E,
    4. et al

    . Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Karlsson P,
    2. Holmberg E,
    3. Lundell M,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial tumors after exposure to ionizing radiation during infancy: a pooled analysis of two Swedish cohorts of 28,008 infants with skin hemangioma. Radiat Res 1998;150:357–64

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Oakeshott P,
    2. Hunt GM,
    3. Poulton A,
    4. et al

    . Expectation of life and unexpected death in open spina bifida: a 40-year complete, non-selective, longitudinal cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010;52:749–53

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Mitchell LE,
    2. Adzick NS,
    3. Melchionne J,
    4. et al

    . Spina bifida. Lancet 2004;364:1885–95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Ashley WW Jr.,
    2. McKinstry RC,
    3. Leonard JR,
    4. et al

    . Use of rapid-sequence magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hydrocephalus in children. J Neurosurg 2005;103:124–30

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Miller JH,
    2. Walkiewicz T,
    3. Towbin RB,
    4. et al

    . Improved delineation of ventricular shunt catheters using fast steady-state gradient recalled-echo sequences in a rapid brain MR imaging protocol in nonsedated pediatric patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:430–35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. McCollough CH,
    2. Leng S,
    3. Yu L,
    4. et al

    . CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 2011;259:311–16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Little MP,
    2. Wakeford R,
    3. Tawn EJ,
    4. et al

    . Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology 2009;251:6–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Tubiana M,
    2. Feinendegen LE,
    3. Yang C,
    4. et al

    . The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 2009;251:13–22

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science