Patency of Branches after Coverage with Multiple Telescoping Flow-Diverter Devices: An In Vivo Study in Rabbits

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Lylyk P,
   2. Miranda C,
   3. Ceratto R,
   4. et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Kallmes DF,
   2. Ding YH,
   3. Dai D,
   4. et al

   . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1153–58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Fiorella D,
   2. Kelly ME,
   3. Albuquerque FC,
   4. et al

   . Curative reconstruction of a giant midbasilar trunk aneurysm with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2009;64:212–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Fiorella D,
   2. Woo HH,
   3. Albuquerque FC,
   4. et al

   . Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2008;62:1115–20, discussion 1120–21

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Sadasivan C,
   2. Cesar L,
   3. Seong J,
   4. et al

   . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Nelson PK,
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Szikora I,
   4. et al

   . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Szikora I,
   2. Berentei Z,
   3. Kulcsar Z,
   4. et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Crowley RW,
   2. Evans AJ,
   3. Kassell NF,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of a fusiform basilar artery aneurysm using multiple “in-stent stents”: technical note. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009;3:496–500

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Kallmes DF,
   2. Ding YH,
   3. Dai D,
   4. et al

   . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Schwartz RS,
    2. Huber KC,
    3. Murphy JG,
    4. et al

    . Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:267–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Ernemann U,
    3. Wetzel SG,
    4. et al

    . High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 2010;41:1690–96

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. van Rooij WJ,
    2. Sluzewski M

    . Perforator infarction after placement of a Pipeline flow-diverting stent for an unruptured A1 aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:E43–E44. Epub 2010 Feb 11

    FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Dai D,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Kadirvel R,
    4. et al

    . Bone formation in elastase-induced rabbit aneurysms embolized with platinum coils: report of 2 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1176–78

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Plenk H Jr.,
    2. Shum JC,
    3. Cruise GM,
    4. et al

    . Cartilage and bone neoformation in rabbit carotid bifurcation aneurysms after endovascular coil embolization. Eur Cell Mater 2008;16:69–79

    PubMed