Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHead and Neck

Kikuchi Disease: Differentiation from Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Based on Patterns of Nodal Necrosis on CT

S. Lee, J.H. Yoo and S.W. Lee
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2012, 33 (1) 135-140; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2724
S. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.H. Yoo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.W. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    KD in an 8-year-old girl. Transverse CT image shows a lymph node (arrow) containing multiple necrotic foci in the peripheral portion of the node. The necrotic foci have indistinct margins, and the extent of nodal necrosis accounts for <30% (mild degree) of the lymph node. The obliteration of the fat plane surrounding the node is seen (arrowhead). The CTN and CTN/M were calculated as 79 HU and 1.0, respectively.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    KD in a 13-year-old boy. Transverse CT image shows a lymph node (arrow) containing multiple necrotic foci in the peripheral portion of the node. The necrotic foci have indistinct margins, and the extent of nodal necrosis accounts for approximately 30%–70% (moderate degree) of the lymph node. The CTN and CTN/M were calculated as 65 HU and 0.9, respectively.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    KD in a 31-year-old woman. Transverse CT scan shows 2 lymph nodes with necrotic foci. The larger one (arrow) has a single necrotic focus with a relatively indistinct margin, and the extent accounts for >70% (severe degree) of the lymph node. Perinodal infiltration is seen (arrowhead). The CTN and CTN/M were 43 HU and 0.7, respectively.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    TL in a 38-year-old woman. Transverse CT scan demonstrates a necrotic lymph node. The lymph node (arrow) has a single necrotic focus with a well-defined margin, and the extent of nodal necrosis accounts for >70% (severe degree) of the lymph node. The CTN and CTN/M were 29 HU and 0.4, respectively.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    TL in a 35-year-old woman. Transverse image shows a lymph node (arrow) having multiple necrotic foci with relatively well-defined margins and a moderate extent of nodal necrosis. Note calcification (arrowhead) within the node. CTN and CTN/M were 38 HU and 0.6, respectively.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    TL in a 37-year-old man. Transverse CT scan shows several lymph nodes with necrotic foci. The larger one (arrow) has multiple necrotic foci (not shown in this figure) with well-defined margins and a severe extent of nodal necrosis. Note the obliteration of perinodal fat around the lymph node (arrowhead). The CTN and CTN/M were 22 HU and 0.4, respectively.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    Graph of CTN of TL and KD. The mean CTN of KD (70.3 ± 18.01) is significantly higher than that of TL (37.4 ± 20.00). When 44.5 was used as the cutoff value for the CTN, a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 86.0% were achieved for differentiating KD from TL.

  • Fig 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8.

    Graph of CTN/M of TL and KD. The mean CTN/M of KD (1.1 ± 0.27) is significantly higher than that of TL (0.6 ± 0.31). When 0.7 was used as the cutoff value for the CTN, a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 76.7% were achieved for differentiating KD from TL.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Characteristics of the study populationa

    CharacteristicsKD (n = 24)TL (n = 45)
    Age (yr)
        Range7–4916–85
        Mean25.139.9
    Sex14 women, 10 men36 women, 9 men
    16-Channel CT15 (62.5%)28 (62.2%)
    64-Channel CT9 (37.5%)17 (37.8%)
    Time interval between CT and excisional biopsy (day)
        Range0–440–27
        Mean8.27.4
    Size (cm)
        Range1.0–3.41.1–5.2
        Mean2.02.5
    Level of analyzed lymph nodes
        I2 (8.3%)1 (2.2%)
        II16 (66.7%)20 (44.4%)
        III1 (4.2%)1 (2.2%)
        IV1 (4.2%)7 (15.6%)
        V4 (16.6%)16 (35.6%)
    • ↵a Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as the number of patients, with percentages in parentheses.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Comparison of patterns of nodal necrosis on CT in KD and TLa

    KD (n = 24)TL (n = 45)P Value
    Extent of necrosis.000
        Mild or moderate21 (87.5%)17 (37.8%)
        Severe3 (12.5%)28 (62.2%)
    No. of necroses.003
        Single2 (8.4%)20 (44.4%)
        Multiple22 (91.6%)25 (55.6%)
    Location of necrosis.339b
        Central6 (25.0%)7 (15.6%)
        Peripheral18 (75.0%)38 (84.4%)
    Margin of necrosis.000
        Indistinct19 (79.2%)9 (20.0%)
        Relatively WD or WD5 (20.8%)36 (80.0%)
    Perinodal infiltration.192b
        Absent2 (9%)11 (24%)
        Present22 (91%)34 (76%)
    Calcification.012b
        Absent24 (100%)34 (76%)
        Present0 (0%)11 (24%)
    CTNc22 (92%)19 (42%).000
    CTN/Md23 (96%)11 (24%).000
    • Note:—WD indicates well-defined; mild, <30% of an affected lymph node; moderate, 30%–70% of an affected lymph node; severe, >70% of an affected lymph node.

    • ↵a Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as the number of patients, with percentages in parentheses.

    • ↵b Calculated with the Fisher exact test. The other categoric variables were compared using the χ2 test.

    • ↵c CTN of >44.5 HU is used as the threshold for differentiating KD from TL.

    • ↵d CTN/M of >0.7 is used as the threshold for differentiating KD from TL.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 1
1 Jan 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kikuchi Disease: Differentiation from Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Based on Patterns of Nodal Necrosis on CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Lee, J.H. Yoo, S.W. Lee
Kikuchi Disease: Differentiation from Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Based on Patterns of Nodal Necrosis on CT
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2012, 33 (1) 135-140; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2724

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Kikuchi Disease: Differentiation from Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Based on Patterns of Nodal Necrosis on CT
S. Lee, J.H. Yoo, S.W. Lee
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2012, 33 (1) 135-140; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2724
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (25)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management of Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease
    Darcie Deaver, Pedro Horna, Hernani Cualing, Lubomir Sokol
    Cancer Control 2014 21 4
  • Distribution of lymphadenopathy in patients with Kikuchi disease
    Lung-Chiung Chen, Chao-Jan Wang, Yu-Chuan Chang, Shian-Sen Shie, Tzou-Yien Lin, Yu-Chia Hsieh, Kuan-Ying Arthur Huang, Chen-Yen Kuo, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Yhu-Chering Huang, Chih-Jung Chen
    Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection 2021 54 2
  • Diagnosis of Kikuchi-Fujimoto Disease: A Comparison between Open Biopsy and Minimally Invasive Ultrasound-Guided Core Biopsy
    Shan-Chi Yu, Chun-Nan Chen, Hsin-I Huang, Tseng-Cheng Chen, Cheng-Ping Wang, Pei-Jen Lou, Jenq-Yuh Ko, Tzu-Yu Hsiao, Tsung-Lin Yang, Syed A. Aziz
    PLoS ONE 2014 9 5
  • CT pattern analysis of necrotizing and nonnecrotizing lymph nodes in Kikuchi disease
    Eun Jung Shim, Kyung Mi Lee, Eui Jong Kim, Hyug-Gi Kim, Ji Hye Jang, Andres R. Floto
    PLOS ONE 2017 12 7
  • Comparison of Ultrasonographic Findings of Biopsy-Proven Tuberculous Lymphadenitis and Kikuchi Disease
    Inseon Ryoo, Sangil Suh, Young Hen Lee, Hyung Suk Seo, Hae Young Seol
    Korean Journal of Radiology 2015 16 4
  • Cervical necrotic lymphadenopathy: a diagnostic tree analysis model based on CT and clinical findings
    Sung-Hye You, Byungjun Kim, Kyung-Sook Yang, Bo Kyu Kim
    European Radiology 2019 29 10
  • Imaging Findings of Variable Axillary Mass and Axillary Lymphadenopathy
    Sung Hee Park, Yu Mi Jeong, So Hyun Cho, Hyun Kyung Jung, Soo Jin Kim, Han Suk Ryu
    Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2014 40 9
  • Combination of FDG PET/CT and Contrast-Enhanced MSCT in Detecting Lymph Node Metastasis of Esophageal Cancer
    Ru Tan, Shu-Zhan Yao, Zhao-Qin Huang, Jun Li, Xin Li, Hai-Hua Tan, Qing-Wei Liu
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2014 15 18
  • Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical and CT findings for differentiating Kikuchi’s disease and tuberculous lymphadenitis presenting with cervical lymphadenopathy
    Hye Jin Baek, Jeong Hyun Lee, Hyun Kyung Lim, Ha Young Lee, Jung Hwan Baek
    Japanese Journal of Radiology 2014 32 11
  • Cervical lymphadenopathy in children: a diagnostic tree analysis model based on ultrasonographic and clinical findings
    Ji Eun Park, Young Jin Ryu, Ji Young Kim, Young Hoon Kim, Ji Young Park, Hyunju Lee, Hyoung Soo Choi
    European Radiology 2020 30 8

More in this TOC Section

  • Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3T with Prognostic Parameters of Retinoblastoma
  • Parathyroid Lesions: Characterization with Dual-Phase Arterial and Venous Enhanced CT of the Neck
  • Efficacy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Differentiation between Lymphomas and Carcinomas of the Nasopharynx and Oropharynx: Correlations of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and Histologic Features
Show more HEAD AND NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire