Parent Vessel Size and Curvature Strongly Influence Risk of Incomplete Stent Apposition in Enterprise Intracranial Aneurysm Stent Coiling

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wells-Roth D,
   2. Biondi A,
   3. Janardhan V,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular procedures for treating wide-necked aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2005;18:E7

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Phatouros CC,
   2. Sasaki TY,
   3. Higashida RT,
   4. et al

   . Stent-supported coil embolization: the treatment of fusiform and wide-neck aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Neurosurgery 2000;47:107–13, discussion 113–15

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Lee YJ,
   2. Kim DJ,
   3. Suh SH,
   4. et al

   . Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2005;47:680–89

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Irie K,
   2. Negoro M,
   3. Hayakawa M,
   4. et al

   . Stent assisted coil embolization: the treatment of wide-necked, dissecting, and fusiform aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2003;9:255–61

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Sedat J,
   2. Chau Y,
   3. Mondot L,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular occlusion of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms with stenting (Neuroform) and coiling: mid-term and long-term results. Neuroradiology 2009;51:401–09

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Benndorf G,
   2. Claus B,
   3. Strother CM,
   4. et al

   . Increased cell opening and prolapse of struts of a Neuroform stent in curved vasculature: value of angiographic computed tomography—technical case report. Neurosurgery 2006;58:ONS-E380, discussion ONS-E380
7. 7.↵
   1. Ebrahimi N,
   2. Claus B,
   3. Lee CY,
   4. et al

   . Stent conformity in curved vascular models with simulated aneurysm necks using flat-panel CT: an in vitro study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:823–29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Rathore S,
   2. Terashima M,
   3. Habara M,
   4. et al

   . Incomplete stent apposition after coronary stent implantation: myth or reality? J Interv Cardiol 2009;22:341–49

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Radu M,
   2. Jorgensen E,
   3. Kelbaek H,
   4. et al

   . Strut apposition after coronary stent implantation visualised with optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention 2010;6:86–93

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Siqueira DA,
    2. Abizaid AA,
    3. Costa Jde R,
    4. et al

    . Late incomplete apposition after drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence and potential for adverse clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1304–09

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Zhang F,
    2. Qian J,
    3. Ge J

    . Coexistent in-stent restenosis, late incomplete stent apposition and mural thrombus in a zotarolimus-eluting stent. J Invasive Cardiol 2008;20:423–25

    PubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Horowitz M,
    2. Levy E,
    3. Sauvageau E,
    4. et al

    . Intra/extra-aneurysmal stent placement for management of complex and wide-necked- bifurcation aneurysms: eight cases using the waffle cone technique. Neurosurgery 2006;58:ONS-258–262, discussion ONS-262

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Namba K,
    2. Niimi Y,
    3. Song JK,
    4. et al

    . Use of Dyna-CT angiography in neuroendovascular decision-making: a case report. Interv Neuroradiol 2009;15:67–72. Epub 2009 Apr 15

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Nemes B,
    2. Lukacs L,
    3. Balazs G,
    4. et al

    . High-resolution CT and angiographic evaluation of NexStent wall adaptation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:436–40

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Weissman NJ,
    2. Ellis SG,
    3. Grube E,
    4. et al

    . Effect of the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent on vascular tissue responses: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound integrated analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1574–82. Epub 2007 May 31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Tanabe K,
    2. Serruys PW,
    3. Degertekin M,
    4. et al

    . Incomplete stent apposition after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare metal stents: insights from the randomized TAXUS II trial. Circulation 2005;111:900–05

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Onizuka M,
    2. Kazekawa K,
    3. Nagata S,
    4. et al

    . The significance of incomplete stent apposition in patients undergoing stenting of internal carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1505–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Degertekin M,
    2. Serruys PW,
    3. Tanabe K,
    4. et al

    . Long-term follow-up of incomplete stent apposition in patients who received sirolimus-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions: an intravascular ultrasound analysis. Circulation 2003;108:2747–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Hoffmann R,
    2. Morice MC,
    3. Moses JW,
    4. et al

    . Impact of late incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on 4-year clinical events: intravascular ultrasound analysis from the multicentre, randomised, RAVEL, E-SIRIUS and SIRIUS trials. Heart 2008;94:322–28. Epub 2007 Aug 29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Cook S,
    2. Wenaweser P,
    3. Togni M,
    4. et al

    . Incomplete stent apposition and very late stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circulation 2007;115:2426–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Kelly ME,
    2. Turner RD,
    3. Moskowitz SI,
    4. et al

    . Delayed migration of a self-expanding intracranial microstent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1959–60

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Rodriguez GJ,
    2. Maud A,
    3. Taylor RA

    . Another delayed migration of an Enterprise stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:E57

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Lavine SD,
    2. Meyers PM,
    3. Connolly ES,
    4. et al

    . Spontaneous delayed proximal migration of Enterprise stent after staged treatment of wide-necked basilar aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2009;64:E1012, discussion E1012

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Mocco J,
    2. Hanel RA,
    3. Sharma J,
    4. et al

    . Use of a vascular reconstruction device to salvage acute ischemic occlusions refractory to traditional endovascular recanalization methods. J Neurosurg 112:557–62