Lowering the Dose in Head CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hall EJ,
   2. Brenner DJ

   . Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 2008; 81: 362–78

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Brenner DJ,
   2. Hall EJ

   . Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277–84

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Gunn MLD,
   2. Kohr JR

   . State of the art: technologies for computed tomography dose reduction. Emerg Radiol 2010; 17: 209–18

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Rogalla P,
   2. Kloeters C,
   3. Hein PA

   . CT technology overview: 64-slice and beyond. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47: 1–11

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Smith B,
   2. Dillon WR,
   3. Gould R,
   4. et al

   . Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1628–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Hara AK,
   2. Paden RG,
   3. Silva AC,
   4. et al

   . Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 764–71

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Prakash P,
   2. Kalra MK,
   3. Kambadakone AK,
   4. et al

   . Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 2010; 45: 202–10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Sagara Y,
   2. Hara AK,
   3. Pavlicek W,
   4. et al

   . Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 713–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Prakash P,
   2. Kalra MK,
   3. Ackman JB,
   4. et al

   . Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology 2010; 256: 261–69

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Prakash P,
    2. Kalra MK,
    3. Digumarthy SR,
    4. et al

    . Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010; 34: 40–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Yanagawa M,
    2. Honda O,
    3. Yoshida S,
    4. et al

    . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 1259–66

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Heilbron BG,
    2. Leipsic J

    . Submillisievert coronary computed tomography angiography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a new reality. Can J Cardiol 2010; 26: 35–36

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Leipsic J,
    2. Labounty TM,
    3. Heilbron B,
    4. et al

    . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 649–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Gosling O,
    2. Loader R,
    3. Venables P,
    4. et al

    . A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart 2010; 96: 922–26

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT: report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. AAPM report no. 96; 2008. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_96.pdf. Accessed November 20, 2010
16. 16.↵
    1. Mullins ME,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Bove P,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 533–38

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Udayasankar UK,
    2. Braithwaite K,
    3. Arvaniti M,
    4. et al

    . Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 802–06

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Murakami Y,
    2. Kakeda S,
    3. Kamada K,
    4. et al

    . Effect of tube voltage on image quality in 64-section multidetector 3D CT angiography: evaluation with a vascular phantom with superimposed bone skull structures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 620–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Bongartz G,
    2. Golding SJ,
    3. Jurik AG,
    4. et al.

    , for the European Study Group of Radiologists and Physicists. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. EUR 16262 EN; 1999. http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/mainindex.htm. Accessed November 20, 2010
20. 20.↵
    1. Silva AC,
    2. Lawder HJ,
    3. Hara A,
    4. et al

    . Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 191–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Pontana F,
    2. Pagniez J,
    3. Flohr T,
    4. et al

    . Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection. Part 1. Evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 627–35. Epub 2010 Nov 5

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Pontana F,
    2. Duhamel A,
    3. Pagniez J,
    4. et al

    . Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection. Part 2. Image quality of low dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 636–43. Epub 2010 Nov 16

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Bittencourt MS,
    2. Schimdt B,
    3. Seltman M,
    4. et al

    . Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 Dec 1. [Epub ahead of print]
24. 24.↵
    1. Lee T,
    2. Chhem RK

    . Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol 2010; 76: 28–35

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Flicek KT,
    2. Hara AK,
    3. Silva AC,
    4. et al

    . Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 126–31

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Marin D,
    2. Nelson RC,
    3. Schindera ST,
    4. et al

    . Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience. Radiology 2010; 254: 145–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science