Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

LetterLetter

Vertebral Artery Dissection: Looking for the Ideal Study Protocol

N. Anzalone and M. Cadioli
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E91; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2492
N. Anzalone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Cadioli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The article by Naggara et al1 on the added value of high-resolution MR imaging in the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection shows an interesting comparison between routine clinical MR imaging examinations as performed in their institution and high-resolution imaging acquired with dedicated coils and different techniques. The study enhances the difficult diagnostic task of demonstrating the presence of a mural hematoma along the tortuous course of the vertebral artery together with the problem of differentiating it from a normal venous plexus.

The use of a multiparametric approach with different sequences together with dedicated coils increases the diagnostic accuracy in the article by Naggara et al.1 This article showed cases in which normal venous plexuses have been interpreted as mural hematomas with routine examinations and cases in which a vessel wall dissection was shown with the use of a high-resolution technique in vessels considered normal at routine examination.

In their study, the authors compared 2 different settings in which the same cases were studied first with contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) and T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) sequences with a regular coil and then with high-resolution T1WI, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), proton attenuation−weighted imaging, and time-of-flight (TOF) techniques with a superficial dedicated coil. As a consequence, the advantage of high signal intensity and high resolution obtained with dedicated coils is coupled with the advantage of performing added sequences.

The limitation of the CE-MRA acquisition in showing the vessel wall is known2 and is related to the use of short parameters that are required to perform first-pass studies; moreover, regarding the study of vertebral arteries, superimposition of venous structures and of venous plexuses can be present when the acquisition is not perfectly timed with the contrast bolus. The information we may obtain from CE-MRA is then similar to that obtained from digital subtraction angiography (ie, that of an indirect vessel stenosis determined by the invisible mural hematoma).

Fat-suppressed T1WI, as used by the authors of the study, may show the methemoglobin hematoma but may be disturbed by flow-related enhancement as the authors state in the “Discussion” section, and the use of a presaturation band may be insufficient due to the very low, almost stagnant, flow in the venous plexuses.

The advantage of the high-resolution multiparametric approach performed with dedicated coils in the study relates to the possibility of comparing the different behaviors of mural hematomas using T1WI and T2WI and the added value of a 3D TOF sequence—that is, sensitivity to high flow, presaturation of veins, and inflow-effect–based. In our experience, venous plexuses around vertebral arteries are never evident with this acquisition. Moreover because TOF techniques are T1WI, they are sensitive to the presence of methemoglobin and can show the mural hematoma if it is in the subacute phase.

An interesting aspect shown by the study is that venous plexuses at T1WI performed with dedicated coils are isointense with neck tissues, probably related to the use of a black-blood acquisition and/or gating association, not used in the fat-suppressed T1WI acquired routinely.

Again it seems that the use of more appropriate sequences, probably more than that of a dedicated coil, helps in the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection.

Nevertheless, it is also true that the use of a high-resolution acquisition is important, especially for the study of vertebral arteries, frequently small in caliber.

The study of vertebral arteries is challenging, especially when dissection is suspected and appropriately designed examinations are needed. A multiparametric approach, with T1WI, T2WI, and TOF MRA followed by CE-MRA may be useful to identify the vessel pathology and differentiate hematomas and venous structures. High-resolution images with dedicated coils may be difficult to obtain in the acute phase, when most of the examinations are required.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Naggara O,
    2. Louillet F,
    3. Touzé E,
    4. et al
    . Added value of high-resolution MR imaging in the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1707–12
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Flis CM,
    2. Jager HR,
    3. Sidhu PS
    . Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: clinical aspects, imaging features and endovascular treatment. Eur Radiol 2007;17:820–34
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 5
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vertebral Artery Dissection: Looking for the Ideal Study Protocol
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
N. Anzalone, M. Cadioli
Vertebral Artery Dissection: Looking for the Ideal Study Protocol
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E91; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2492

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Vertebral Artery Dissection: Looking for the Ideal Study Protocol
N. Anzalone, M. Cadioli
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2011, 32 (5) E91; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2492
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Reply:
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Vertebral artery hypoplasia and vertebral artery dissection: A hospital-based cohort study
  • 3D Fast Spin-Echo T1 Black-Blood Imaging for the Diagnosis of Cervical Artery Dissection
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire