Blood Flow Changes Caused by Distal Filter Protection and Catheter Aspiration in the Internal Carotid Artery during Carotid Stenting: Evaluation Using Carotid Doppler Sonography

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Maleux G,
   2. Demaerel P,
   3. Verbeken E,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1830–33

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Jansen O,
   2. Fiehler J,
   3. Hartmann M,
   4. et al

   . Protection or nonprotection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE Trial. Stroke 2009;40:841–46

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Katzen BT,
   2. Criado FJ,
   3. Ramee SR,
   4. et al.,
   5. for the CASES-PMS Investigators

   . Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:316–23

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Schofer J,
   2. Arendt M,
   3. Tübler T,
   4. et al

   . Late cerebral embolization after emboli-protected carotid artery stenting assessed by sequential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:571–77

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Casserly IP,
   2. Abou-Chebl A,
   3. Fathi RB,
   4. et al

   . Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1466–72

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Sorimachi T,
   2. Nishino K,
   3. Shimbo J,
   4. et al

   . Routine use of debris aspiration before retrieval of distal filter protection devices in carotid arterial stenting: analysis of captured debris and evaluation of clinical results. Neurosurgery. In press
7. 7.↵
   1. Hendriks JM,
   2. Zindler JD,
   3. van der Lugt A,
   4. et al

   . Embolic protection filters for carotid stenting: differences in flow obstruction depending on filter construction. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:47–50

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Siewiorek GM,
   2. Wholey MH,
   3. Finol EA

   . In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:712–24

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991:325:445–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Roffi M,
    2. Greutmann M,
    3. Schwarz U,
    4. et al

    . Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:103–09

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Finol EA,
    2. Siewiorek GM,
    3. Scotti CM,
    4. et al

    . Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:177–85

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Siewiorek GM,
    2. Wholey MH,
    3. Finol EA

    . In vivo performance of distal protection filters: pulsatile flow conditions. J Endovasc Ther 2009;16:735–43

    Abstract/FREE Full Text