Research ArticleNeurointervention
Is Mechanical Clot Removal or Disruption a Cost-Effective Treatment for Acute Stroke?
M.N. Nguyen-Huynh and S.C. Johnston
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2011, 32 (2) 244-249; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2329

Submit a Response to This Article
Jump to comment:
No eLetters have been published for this article.
In this issue
Advertisement
M.N. Nguyen-Huynh, S.C. Johnston
Is Mechanical Clot Removal or Disruption a Cost-Effective Treatment for Acute Stroke?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2011, 32 (2) 244-249; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2329
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Reocclusion after successful endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The THRACE Randomized Controlled Trial
- Systematic Review of the Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Rapid Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Observed Cost and Variations in Short Term Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy for Ischemic Stroke in Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III
- Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a cost-utility analysis
- Cost-Utility Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Stent Retrievers in Acute Ischemic Stroke
- The Alphabet of Imaging in Acute Stroke: Does It Spell Improved Selection and Outcome?
- Managing hyperacute ischaemic stroke with interventional neuroradiology
- A Cost-Utility Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy as an Adjunct to Intravenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator for Acute Large-Vessel Ischemic Stroke
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement