Insights into Adult Postlesional Language Cortical Plasticity Provided by Cerebral Blood Oxygen Level–Dependent Functional MR Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Loring DW,
   2. Meador KJ,
   3. Allison JD,
   4. et al

   . Now you see it, now you don't: statistical and methodological considerations in fMRI. Epilepsy Behav 2002;3:539–47

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Pillai JJ,
   2. Allison JD,
   3. Sethuraman S,
   4. et al

   . Functional MR imaging study of language-related differences in bilingual cerebellar activation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:523–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Cohen JD,
   2. MacWhinney B,
   3. Flatt M,
   4. et al

   . PsyScope: a new interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behav Res Methods Instru Comput 1993;25:257–71
4. 4.↵
   1. Friston KJ

   . Testing for anatomically specified regional effects. Human Brain Mapp 1997;5:133–36

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Heiss WD

   . WSO Leadership in Stroke Medicine Award Lecture Vienna, September 26, 2008: functional imaging correlates to disturbance and recovery of language function. Int J Stroke 2009;4:129–36

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Bütefisch CM,
   2. Kleiser R,
   3. Seitz RJ

   . Post-lesional cerebral reorganisation: evidence from functional neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Physiol Paris 2006;99:437–54. Epub 2006 May 24

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Hess G,
   2. Donoghue JP

   . Long-term depression of horizontal connections in rat motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 1996;8:658–65

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Hess G,
   2. Aizenman CD,
   3. Donoghue JP

   . Conditions for the induction of long-term potentiation in layer II/III horizontal connections of the rat motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 1996;75:1765–78

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Cousin E,
   2. Baciu M,
   3. Pichat C,
   4. et al

   . Functional MRI evidence for language plasticity in adult epileptic patients: preliminary results. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008;4:235–46

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Mbwana J,
    2. Berl MM,
    3. Ritzl EK,
    4. et al

    . Limitations to plasticity of language network reorganization in localization related epilepsy. Brain 2009;132 (pt 2):347–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Just MA,
    2. Carpenter PA,
    3. Keller TA,
    4. et al

    . Brain activity modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 1996;274:114–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Gaillard WD,
    2. Pugliese M,
    3. Grandin CB,
    4. et al

    . Cortical localization of reading in normal children: an fMRI language study. Neurology 2001;57:47–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Rosenberger LR,
    2. Zeck J,
    3. Berl MM,
    4. et al

    . Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric language reorganization in complex partial epilepsy. Neurology 2009;72:1830–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Rasmussen T,
    2. Milner B

    . The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1977;299:355–69

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Springer JA,
    2. Binder JR,
    3. Hammeke TA,
    4. et al

    . Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study. Brain 1999;122 (pt 11):2033–46

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Gaillard WD,
    2. Berl MM,
    3. Moore EN,
    4. et al

    . Atypical language in lesional and nonlesional complex partial epilepsy. Neurology 2007;69:1761–71

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Nelson CA,
    2. Luciano M

    1. Bates E,
    2. Roe K

    . Language development in children with unilateral brain injury. In: Nelson CA, Luciano M eds. Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2001
18. 18.↵
    1. Krägeloh-Mann I

    . Imaging of early brain injury and cortical plasticity. Exp Neurol 2004;190 (suppl 1):S84–90

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Staudt M,
    2. Lidzba K,
    3. Grodd W,
    4. et al

    . Right hemispheric organization of language following early left sided brain lesions: functional MRI topography. Neuroimage 2002;16:954–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Lidzba K,
    2. Staudt M,
    3. Wilke M,
    4. et al

    . Lesion-induced right-hemispheric language and organization of nonverbal functions. Neuroreport 2006;17:929–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Strauss E,
    2. Satz P,
    3. Wada J

    . An examination of the crowding hypothesis in epileptic patients who have undergone the carotid amytal test. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:1221–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Devinsky O,
    2. Perrine K,
    3. Llinas R,
    4. et al

    . Anterior temporal language areas in patients with early onset of temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol 1993;34:727–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Thulborn KR,
    2. Carpenter PA,
    3. Just MA

    . Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. Stroke 1999;30:749–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Hertz-Pannier L,
    2. Chiron C,
    3. Jambaque I,
    4. et al

    . Late plasticity for language in a child's non-dominant hemisphere: a pre- and post-surgery fMRI study. Brain 2002;125 (pt 2): 361–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Weiller C,
    2. Isensee C,
    3. Rijntjes M,
    4. et al

    . Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study. Ann Neurol 1995;37:723–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Karbe H,
    2. Thiel A,
    3. Weber-Luxenburger G,
    4. et al

    . Brain plasticity in poststroke aphasia: what is the contribution of the right hemisphere? Brain Lang 1998;64:215–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Karbe H,
    2. Herholz K,
    3. Halber M,
    4. et al

    . Collateral inhibition of transcallosal activity facilitates functional brain asymmetry. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18:1157–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Samson Y,
    2. Belin P,
    3. Zilbovicius M,
    4. et al

    . Mechanisms of aphasia recovery and brain imaging. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1999;155:725–30

    PubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Fernandez B,
    2. Cardebat D,
    3. Demonet JF,
    4. et al

    . Functional MRI follow-up study of language processes in healthy subjects and during recovery in a case of aphasia. Stroke 2004;35:2171–76

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Seghier M,
    2. Lazeyras F,
    3. Momjian S,
    4. et al

    . Language representation in a patient with a dominant right hemisphere: fMRI evidence for an intrahemispheric reorganisation. Neuroreport 2001;12:2785–90

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Rosen HJ,
    2. Petersen SE,
    3. Linenweber MR,
    4. et al

    . Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex. Neurology 2000;55:1883–94

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Cao Y,
    2. Vikingstad EM,
    3. George KP,
    4. et al

    . Cortical language activation in stroke patients recovering from aphasia with functional MRI. Stroke 1999;30:2331–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Heiss WD,
    2. Karbe H,
    3. Weber-Luxenburger G,
    4. et al

    . Speech-induced cerebral metabolic activation reflects recovery from aphasia. J Neurol Sci 1997;145:213–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Perani D,
    2. Cappa SF,
    3. Tettamanti M,
    4. et al

    . fMRI study of word retrieval in aphasia. Brain Lang 2003;85:357–68

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Crosson B,
    2. McGregor K,
    3. Gopinath KS,
    4. et al

    . Functional MRI of language in aphasia: a review of the literature and the methodological challenges. Neuropsychol Rev 2007;17:157–77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Rosenberg K,
    2. Liebling R,
    3. Avidan G,
    4. et al

    . Language related reorganization in adult brain with slow growing glioma: fMRI prospective case-study. Neurocase 2008;14:465–73

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Saur D,
    2. Lange R,
    3. Baumgaertner A,
    4. et al

    . Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006;129 (pt 6):1371–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Vitali P,
    2. Abutalebi J,
    3. Tettamanti M,
    4. et al

    . Training-induced brain remapping in chronic aphasia: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:152–60

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Wierenga CE,
    2. Maher LM,
    3. Moore AB,
    4. et al

    . Neural substrates of syntactic mapping treatment: an fMRI study of two cases. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2006;12:132–46

    PubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Crosson B,
    2. Moore AB,
    3. Gopinath K,
    4. et al

    . Role of the right and left hemispheres in recovery of function during treatment of intention in aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci 2005;17:392–406

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 41.↵
    1. Meinzer M,
    2. Flaisch T,
    3. Obleser J,
    4. et al

    . Brain regions essential for improved lexical access in an aged aphasic patient: a case report BMC Neurol 2006;6:28

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Peck KK,
    2. Moore AB,
    3. Crosson B,
    4. et al

    . Pre and post fMRI of an aphasia therapy: shifts in hemodynamic time to peak during an overt language task. Stroke 2004;35:554–59

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Fridriksson J,
    2. Morrow-Odom L,
    3. Moser D,
    4. et al

    . Neural recruitment associated with anomia treatment in aphasia. Neuroimage 2006;32:1403–12

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Meunier S,
    2. Duffau H,
    3. Garnero H,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of the somatosensory cortical mapping of the fingers using a whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) and direct electrical stimulations during surgery in awake patients. Neuroimage 2000;15:S868
45. 45.↵
    1. Dong Y,
    2. Holly LT,
    3. Albistegui-Dubois R,
    4. et al

    . Compensatory cerebral adaptations before and evolving changes after surgical decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;9:538–51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. 46.↵
    1. Duffau H,
    2. Capelle L,
    3. Denvil D,
    4. et al

    . Functional recovery after surgical resection of low grade gliomas in eloquent brain: hypothesis of brain compensation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:901–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    1. Duffau H,
    2. Denvil D,
    3. Capelle L

    . Long term reshaping of language, sensory and motor maps after glioma resection: a new parameter to integrate in the surgical strategy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:511–16

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Desmurget M,
    2. Bonnetblanc F,
    3. Duffau H

    . Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. Brain 2007;130:898–914

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. 49.↵
    1. Duffau H

    . Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma: insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity. Lancet Neurol 2005;4:476–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Wu CX,
    2. Pu S,
    3. Lin Y,
    4. et al

    . Fractionated resection on low grade gliomas involving Broca's area and insights to brain plasticity. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:2026–30

    PubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Patrissi G,
    2. Stein DG

    . Temporal factors in recovery of function after brain damage. Exp Neurol 1975;47:470–80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. 52.↵
    1. Duffau H,
    2. Sichez JP,
    3. Lehericy S

    . Intraoperative unmasking of brain redundant motor sites during resection of a precentral angioma: evidence using direct cortical stimulation. Ann Neurol 2000;47:132–35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    1. Duffau H

    . Acute functional reorganization of the human motor cortex during resection of central lesions: a study using intraoperative brain mapping. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:506–13

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
54. 54.↵
    1. Duffau H,
    2. Capelle L

    . Functional recuperation following lesions of the primary somatosensory fields: study of compensatory mechanisms [in French]. Neurochirurgie 2001;47:557–63

    PubMedWeb of Science
55. 55.↵
    1. Duffau H,
    2. Capelle L

    . Functional recuperation after resection of gliomas infiltrating primary somatosensory fields: study of perioperative electric stimulation [in French]. Neurochirurgie 2001;47:534–41

    PubMedWeb of Science
56. 56.↵
    1. Cappa SF,
    2. Perani D,
    3. Grassi F,
    4. et al

    . A PET follow-up study of recovery after stroke in acute aphasics. Brain Lang 1997;56:55–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
57. 57.↵
    1. Musso M,
    2. Weiller C,
    3. Kiebel S,
    4. et al

    . Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia. Brain 1999;122:1781–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    1. Thiel A,
    2. Herholz K,
    3. Koyuncu A,
    4. et al

    . Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: a positron emission tomography activation study. Ann Neurol 2001;50:620–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science