Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHead and Neck

High-Resolution 3D MR Imaging of the Trochlear Nerve

B.S. Choi, J.H. Kim, C. Jung and J.-M. Hwang
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2010, 31 (6) 1076-1079; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1992
B.S. Choi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.H. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Jung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-M. Hwang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The cisternal segment of the trochlear nerve is difficult to identify reliably by routine MR imaging. We investigated the visibility and anatomic features of the trochlear nerve by using high-resolution 3D-bTFE imaging in healthy subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted with 32 healthy subjects without ocular movement disorders. For us to visualize the cisternal segment of the trochlear nerve, all subjects underwent 3D-bTFE imaging at 3T with 2 different resolutions: conventional resolution (voxel size, 0.67 × 0.45 × 1.4 mm) and high resolution (voxel size, 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.25 mm). Visibility of the trochlear nerve was graded with the use of a qualitative scale of certainty as follows: definite, probable, and indeterminate. The diameter of the trochlear nerve was measured.

RESULTS: On conventional-resolution images, the visibility of the trochlear nerve was definite in 3 nerves, probable in 12 nerves, and indeterminate in 49 nerves. On high-resolution images, visibility was definite in 63 nerves and probable in 1 nerve. The mean diameter of the trochlear nerve was 0.54 mm (range, 0.35–0.96 mm).

CONCLUSIONS: The trochlear nerve was visualized 100% of the time on high-resolution imaging with a voxel smaller than the nerve diameter. High-resolution imaging should have an important role in investigating the pathogenic mechanism of neuropathic strabismus, such as congenital superior oblique palsy.

Abbreviations

3D-bTFE
3D balanced turbo-field echo
NA
not applicable
SENSE
sensitivity-encoding
SNR
signal-to-noise ratio

Trochlear nerve palsy is the most frequent isolated cranial neuropathy that affects ocular motility.1 The etiologic mechanism of the disease is unclear. Congenital aplasia or hypoplasia of the oculomotor or abducens nerve has been documented on MR imaging in patients with congenital oculomotor nerve palsy and Duane retraction syndrome.2,3 However, the presence or absence of the trochlear nerve has not been investigated in congenital superior oblique palsy, which is the most common type of trochlear nerve palsy. Recently, several MR imaging studies have been conducted to identify the trochlear nerve4–8; however, these studies did not consistently demonstrate it due to its small size, even in healthy subjects.

In this study, we used MR imaging with much higher resolution compared with previous studies in which the voxel size was smaller than the diameter of the trochlear nerve. The visibility and anatomic features of the trochlear nerve by using this sequence were investigated in healthy subjects and compared with conventional sequences.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This study was conducted with 34 healthy subjects (18 males and 16 females; age range, 3–59 years; mean age, 39 years) without any ocular movement disorder. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and our institutional review board approved the study protocol.

MR Imaging Sequences

MR imaging was conducted by using a 3T system (Intera Achieva; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) with a SENSE head coil. All subjects underwent 3D-bTFE imaging with 2 different resolutions: conventional and high resolution. Conventional-resolution imaging was performed in an axial plane, including the midbrain, pons, and upper medulla oblongata. The sequence parameters were as follows: TR, 6.2 ms; TE, 3.1 ms; flip angle, 60°; FOV, 150 × 150 mm; matrix, 224 × 333; section thickness, 1.4 mm (0.7-mm overlap with the adjacent section); voxel size, 0.67 × 0.45 × 1.4 mm; 70 sections; SENSE factor, 1.5; acquisition time, 3 minutes 39 seconds.

High-resolution imaging was performed at the lower midbrain and upper pons, including the inferior margin of the inferior colliculus, which is known as the level of the root exit zone of the trochlear nerve. The scanning plane was set to an oblique axial direction perpendicular to the long axis of the aqueduct, which was approximately parallel to the course of the trochlear nerve. The sequence parameters were as follows: TR, 9.9 ms; TE, 5.0 ms; flip angle, 60°; FOV, 150 × 150 mm; matrix, 500 × 500; section thickness, 0.25 mm; voxel size, 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.25 mm; 60 sections; SENSE factor, 2; acquisition time, 7 minutes 14 seconds.

Image Analysis

Two neuroradiologists analyzed the MR images and determined the grade of visibility of the trochlear nerve by consensus. Datasets were anonymized and presented to the examiners in a random order. The conventional-resolution images were interpreted first; then the high-resolution images were interpreted at another session 2 weeks later to minimize recall bias.

Visibility of the trochlear nerve was graded with the use of a qualitative scale of certainty, with a grading of definite, probable, and indeterminate. The criteria of “definite” required both of the following: 1) a curvilinear nonbranching structure in the perimesencephalic cistern coursing in the anterolateral direction toward the ipsilateral tentorium, and 2) identification of the root exit point at the posterior aspect of the pontomesencephalic junction (ie, at the level of the inferior margin of the inferior colliculus). If the first requirement was fulfilled but the second requirement was not fulfilled, the grade was given as “probable.” If both requirements were not fulfilled, the grade was given as “indeterminate.” In several cases, images were reformatted in various oblique planes to trace the course of the trochlear nerve. Visibility was examined statistically by using the χ2 test.

To validate the results of conventional-resolution images, we anatomically correlated the trochlear nerves with definite or probable visibility as determined on conventional-resolution images with the findings on reference standards, which were high-resolution images in this study.

To evaluate the size of the trochlear nerve, we measured the diameter on high-resolution images in all subjects. Measurements were performed 3 times and averaged.

Results

Of 34 subjects, 2 subjects were excluded from the study due to the degradation of imaging quality by severe motion artifacts. Ultimately, 64 nerves of 32 subjects were analyzed.

Visibility of the trochlear nerve was significantly different between the conventional- and high-resolution images (Table). On conventional-resolution images, visibility was definite in 4.7% (3 of 64 nerves), probable in 18.8% (12 of 64 nerves), and indeterminate in 76.6% (49 of 64 nerves) of cases. On high-resolution images, visibility was definite in 98.4% (63 of 64 nerves) and probable in 1.6% (1 of 64 nerves) of cases. Visibility was significantly different between the 2 sequences (P < .0001). When considering “probable” as positive identification of the trochlear nerve, the nerve was identified in 100% (64 of 64 nerves) of cases on high-resolution images and was identified in 23.4% (15 of 64 nerves) of cases on conventional-resolution images. Visibility was significantly different between the 2 sequences (P < .0001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Visibility of 64 trochlear nerves on conventional- and high-resolution 3D-bTFE imaging

Of 15 trochlear nerves with grades of definite or probable visibility on conventional-resolution images, 11 nerves were concordant with the findings of high-resolution images (Table) (Figs 1 and 2). However, 4 nerves were found to be false-positive; the nerves were proved to be the perimesencephalic vessels by high-resolution imaging (Figs 3 and 4). The mean diameter of the trochlear nerve was 0.54 mm (range, 0.35–0.96 mm).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Concordant visibility of the trochlear nerves on conventional- and high-resolution 3D-bTFE images in a 48-year-old man. Conventional- (A) and high-resolution (B) images show clearly the cisternal segment of the right trochlear nerve (arrows) with definite visibility from the root exit point at the posterior aspect of the pontomesencephalic junction to the ipsilateral tentorium.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Concordant visibility of the trochlear nerves on conventional- and high-resolution 3D-bTFE images in a 34-year-old man. A, Conventional image with a fusion of different right and left levels shows curvilinear nonbranching structures (arrows) with “probable” visibility, coursing in an anterolateral direction toward the ipsilateral tentorium. B, Reformatted high-resolution image clearly shows the trochlear nerves bilaterally (arrows) from the root exit points with “definite” visibility.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

False-positive case of the trochlear nerve on a conventional-resolution 3D-bTFE image in a 47-year-old man. A, Conventional image shows the root exit point and its cisternal course of the left trochlear nerve (arrows) with “definite” visibility. B, Reformatted high-resolution image clearly separates the left trochlear nerve (arrows) from the vessel (arrowheads), which is misinterpreted as the trochlear nerve in A.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

False-positive case of the trochlear nerve on conventional-resolution 3D-bTFE image in a 3-year-old girl. A, Conventional image shows the cisternal segment of the left trochlear nerve (arrows) with “probable” visibility. B, Reformatted high-resolution image clearly separates the left trochlear nerve (arrows) from the adjacent vessel (arrowheads) running parallel, which is misinterpreted as the trochlear nerve in A.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to compare high-resolution 3D-bTFE imaging with conventional imaging in visualizing the trochlear nerve in healthy subjects on a 3T MR imaging system. This technique provides a T2 over T1 contrast and can be very useful in regions with tissues with very different T2 relaxation times, such as CSF and neural structures.9 Thus, 3D-bTFE imaging can depict the small cranial nerves with high tissue contrast and high spatial resolution, as in previous MR imaging studies.4,5,7,10

The identification of the trochlear nerve on MR imaging is related to the spatial resolution of the imaging, anatomic configuration (ie, the size and course) of the nerve, and proximity of the nerve to adjacent vessels with a similar course and caliber. Recently, several MR imaging studies have been conducted to visualize the trochlear nerve in healthy subjects4,5,7; however, the nerve has not been consistently identified. Cheng et al4 used a 0.35 × 0.35 × 1.0 mm voxel (size of the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis) and reported definite identification of the trochlear nerve in 16% of cases, probable identification in 22% of cases, and no identification in 62% of cases. Fischbach et al5 used a 0.37 × 0.47 × 2.0 mm voxel at a field strength of 3T and reported 85% detectability, including blurred as well as distinct visualization. Yousry et al7 used a 0.35 × 0.69 × 0.69 mm voxel and visualized the trochlear nerve definitely in 75% of cases and probably in 20% of cases, the best level of detection ever reported. We think that the resolution of the z-axis (ie, section thickness) used in the previous studies was too large to identify the trochlear nerve consistently. The mean diameter of the trochlear nerve was only 0.54 mm (range, 0.35–0.96 mm) in our study, which is similar to the diameter reported in a previous cadaver study (mean, 0.85 mm; range, 0.5–1.1 mm).11 In addition to its small size, the trochlear nerve courses horizontally in the perimesencephalic cistern, approximately parallel to the imaging plane. Therefore, the higher z-axis resolution used in our protocol compared with previous studies must have been a key factor in increasing the identification rate of the trochlear nerve. We used a 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.25 mm voxel for which the resolution of the z-axis was smaller than the nerve diameter for 3T imaging, and the nerve was visualized in 100% of cases (definite, 98.4%; probable, 1.6%).

Another obstacle to identifying the nerve is its proximity to the perimesencephalic vessels with a similar course and caliber. These vessels include the superior cerebellar artery and its branches, and the brachial tributaries of the precentral cerebellar vein.12 Villain et al13 reported that 90% of the trochlear nerves had ≥1 contact with the superior cerebellar artery or its branches. To discriminate the trochlear nerve from these vessels, Yousry et al7 additionally performed gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. In our study, much higher resolution imaging could trace the entire course of the trochlear nerve from its exit point and was able to discriminate the nerve from adjacent vessels in all subjects without the need for MR angiography. Oblique reformation of the images also provided easy tracing of the nerve in several cases.

There are several limitations to our study. First, high-resolution 3D-bTFE imaging has a relatively poor SNR and a long scanning time. The SNR is linearly proportional to the voxel volume14; therefore, the small voxel has a negative effect on the SNR.15 In addition, a long scanning time due to high spatial resolution may exacerbate motion artifacts on images. With continuing development of coil and parallel imaging technology, this limitation should be overcome to a great extent. Second, only 3 pediatric control subjects were included in the study. Superior oblique palsy is the most common pediatric ocular motility disorder.1 A narrower cisternal space and smaller trochlear nerve in children than in adults may perturb consistent identification of the trochlear nerve. Therefore, a further study including a substantial number of pediatric control subjects is needed.

Conclusions

The trochlear nerve can be consistently visualized on high-resolution imaging with a voxel smaller than the nerve diameter. High-resolution imaging should have an important role in investigating abnormalities of the trochlear nerve.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by grant 11-209-023 from the Research Fund of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Holmes JM,
    2. Mutyala S,
    3. Maus TL,
    4. et al
    . Pediatric third, fourth, and sixth nerve palsies: a population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:388–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kim JH,
    2. Hwang JM
    . Magnetic resonance imaging in three patients with congenital oculomotor nerve palsy. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1266–67
    FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kim JH,
    2. Hwang JM
    . Usefulness of MR imaging in children without characteristic clinical findings of Duane's retraction syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:702–05
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cheng YS,
    2. Zhou ZR,
    3. Peng WJ,
    4. et al
    . Three-dimensional-fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition and T2-weighted fast spin-echo magnetic resonance sequences on visualization of cranial nerves III - XII. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:276–79
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fischbach F,
    2. Müller M,
    3. Bruhn H
    . High-resolution depiction of the cranial nerves in the posterior fossa (N III-N XII) with 2D fast spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequences at 3.0 T. Clin Imaging 2009;33:169–74
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Yousry I,
    2. Camelio S,
    3. Schmid UD,
    4. et al
    . Visualization of cranial nerves I-XII: value of 3D CISS and T2-weighted FSE sequences. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1061–67
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yousry I,
    2. Moriggl B,
    3. Dieterich M,
    4. et al
    . MR anatomy of the proximal cisternal segment of the trochlear nerve: neurovascular relationships and landmarks. Radiology 2002;223:31–38
    PubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Solsberg M,
    2. Fournier D,
    3. Potts D
    . MR imaging of the excised human brainstem: a correlative neuroanatomic study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:1003–13
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Scheffler K,
    2. Lehnhardt S
    . Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2409–18
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Demer JL,
    2. Ortube MC,
    3. Engle EC,
    4. et al
    . High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates abnormalities of motor nerves and extraocular muscles in patients with neuropathic strabismus. J AAPOS 2006;10:135–42
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ettl A,
    2. Salomonowitz E
    . Visualization of the oculomotor cranial nerves by magnetic resonance imaging. Strabismus 2004;12:85–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tubbs RS,
    2. Oakes WJ
    . Relationships of the cisternal segment of the trochlear nerve. J Neurosurg 1998;89:1015–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Villain M,
    2. Segnarbieux F,
    3. Bonnel F,
    4. et al
    . The trochlear nerve: anatomy by microdissection. Surg Radiol Anat 1993;15:169–73
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Bushberg JT,
    2. Seibert JA,
    3. Leidholdt EM,
    4. et al
    . The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1994
  15. 15.↵
    1. Stark DD,
    2. Bradley WG Jr.
    1. Hendrick RE
    . Image contrast and noise. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG Jr. , eds. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1999:43–67
  • Received September 25, 2009.
  • Accepted after revision November 11, 2009.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 31 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 31, Issue 6
1 Jun 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High-Resolution 3D MR Imaging of the Trochlear Nerve
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
B.S. Choi, J.H. Kim, C. Jung, J.-M. Hwang
High-Resolution 3D MR Imaging of the Trochlear Nerve
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2010, 31 (6) 1076-1079; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1992

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
High-Resolution 3D MR Imaging of the Trochlear Nerve
B.S. Choi, J.H. Kim, C. Jung, J.-M. Hwang
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2010, 31 (6) 1076-1079; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1992
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • High-Resolution 7T MR Imaging of the Trochlear Nerve
  • Quantitative analysis of structure-function relationship between ocular motility and superior oblique muscle hypoplasia in unilateral superior oblique palsy
  • Coregistration and Fusion: An Easy and Reliable Method for Identifying Cranial Nerve IV on MRI
  • Trochlear Groove and Trochlear Cistern: Useful Anatomic Landmarks for Identifying the Tentorial Segment of Cranial Nerve IV on MRI
  • Association of Superior Oblique Muscle Volumes with the Presence or Absence of the Trochlear Nerve on High-Resolution MR Imaging in Congenital Superior Oblique Palsy
  • Morphometry of the Trochlear Nerve and Superior Oblique Muscle Volume in Congenital Superior Oblique Palsy
  • Visualization of the Trochlear Nerve in the Cistern with Use of High-Resolution Turbo Spin-Echo Multisection Motion-Sensitized Driven Equilibrium
  • MR Imaging of Congenital or Developmental Neuropathic Strabismus: Common and Uncommon Findings
  • Comparison of subjective and objective torsion in patients with acquired unilateral superior oblique muscle palsy
  • Crossref (50)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Visualization of Cranial Nerves Using High-Definition Fiber Tractography
    Masanori Yoshino, Kumar Abhinav, Fang-Cheng Yeh, Sandip Panesar, David Fernandes, Sudhir Pathak, Paul A. Gardner, Juan C. Fernandez-Miranda
    Neurosurgery 2016 79 1
  • Congenital Superior Oblique Palsy and Trochlear Nerve Absence
    Hee Kyung Yang, Jae Hyoung Kim, Jeong-Min Hwang
    Ophthalmology 2012 119 1
  • High-Resolution CISS MR Imaging With and Without Contrast for Evaluation of the Upper Cranial Nerves
    Ari M. Blitz, Leonardo L. Macedo, Zachary D. Chonka, Ahmet T. Ilica, Asim F. Choudhri, Gary L. Gallia, Nafi Aygun
    Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 2014 24 1
  • Brainstem Pathways for Horizontal Eye Movement: Pathologic Correlation with MR Imaging
    Yun Jung Bae, Jae Hyoung Kim, Byung Se Choi, Cheolkyu Jung, Eunhee Kim
    RadioGraphics 2013 33 1
  • Anatomic Considerations, Nomenclature, and Advanced Cross-sectional Imaging Techniques for Visualization of the Cranial Nerve Segments by MR Imaging
    Ari M. Blitz, Asim F. Choudhri, Zachary D. Chonka, Ahmet T. Ilica, Leonardo L. Macedo, Avneesh Chhabra, Gary L. Gallia, Nafi Aygun
    Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 2014 24 1
  • Absence of the Trochlear Nerve in Patients with Superior Oblique Hypoplasia
    Jae Hyoung Kim, Jeong-Min Hwang
    Ophthalmology 2010 117 11
  • Imaging of Cranial Nerves III, IV, VI in Congenital Cranial Dysinnervation Disorders
    Jae Hyoung Kim, Jeong-Min Hwang
    Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2017 31 3
  • Association of Superior Oblique Muscle Volumes with the Presence or Absence of the Trochlear Nerve on High-Resolution MR Imaging in Congenital Superior Oblique Palsy
    H.K. Yang, D.S. Lee, J.H. Kim, J.-M. Hwang
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015 36 4
  • High Resolution Three-Dimensional MR Imaging of the Skull Base
    Ari Meir Blitz, Nafi Aygun, Daniel A. Herzka, Masaru Ishii, Gary L. Gallia
    Radiologic Clinics of North America 2017 55 1
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cranial Nerves at 7 Tesla
    A. E. Grams, O. Kraff, J. Kalkmann, S. Orzada, S. Maderwald, M. E. Ladd, M. Forsting, E. R. Gizewski
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2013 23 1

More in this TOC Section

  • Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3T with Prognostic Parameters of Retinoblastoma
  • Parathyroid Lesions: Characterization with Dual-Phase Arterial and Venous Enhanced CT of the Neck
  • Efficacy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Differentiation between Lymphomas and Carcinomas of the Nasopharynx and Oropharynx: Correlations of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and Histologic Features
Show more HEAD AND NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire