Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticlePatient Safety

Reduction of the Radiation Dose for Multidetector Row CT Angiography of Cerebral Aneurysms Using an Edge-Preserving Adaptive Filter: A Vascular Phantom Study

S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, M. Ogawa, K. Otsubo and Y. Morishita
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2010, 31 (5) 827-829; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1798
S. Kakeda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Korogi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Ogawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Otsubo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Morishita
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: To determine how much the radiation dose can be reduced in multidetector row CTA using a QDS, we performed CTA at various exposure settings using a vascular phantom simulating various aneurysms with superimposed bone skull structures, and postprocessed the image data with QDS. Our results demonstrated that the radiation dose of CTA can be reduced by at least 25% and the image quality for visualizing aneurysms can be preserved by applying the QDS.

Abbreviations

CNR
contrast-to-noise ratio
CTA
CT angiography
CTDIw
weighted CT dose index
MTF
modulation transfer function
Q04
mild QDS
Q06
heavy sharpening QDS
Q08
heavy smoothing QDS
QDS
quantum denoising system
ROI
region of interest
W
weight of blending the smoothed image and the sharpened image

Although CTA is an efficient noninvasive imaging method for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms, there is a trend toward using an increased radiation dose with multidetector row CT in comparison with the dose used for single-detector row CT. Many investigators recommend low-tube-voltage scanning with properly adjusted tube current for reducing the radiation dose during cerebral CT because a photoelectric effect in x-ray attenuation increases at lower tube voltages.1 On the other hand, reducing the radiation dose causes an increase in the image noise content. Currently, several previous studies have reported that the edge-preserving adaptive filter decreases qualitative and quantitative noise in low-dose CT images.2 However, the effect of this filter on the lesion conspicuity of cerebral CTA has not been investigated. Recently, a new edge-preserving adaptive filter known as the QDS (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) has been developed, which can selectively eliminate the noise without affecting the resolution in low-dose scanning. The purpose of this phantom study was to assess how much the radiation dose in CTA for cerebral aneurysms can be reduced by using the QDS.

Technique

Phantom Design

An anthropomorphic vascular phantom made of silicone rubber with superimposed bone skull structures was designed to simulate bilateral intracranial arteries with various intracranial aneurysms. Two types of simulated aneurysms (10 aneurysms with diameters of 3 mm and 6 aneurysms with diameters of 6 mm) were placed on the simulated intracranial artery. Six aneurysms with diameters of 6 mm had an aneurysmal bleb with a diameter of 2 mm. This phantom was filled with 2 kinds of contrast material concentrations (20 and 15 mg I/mL).

Image Acquisition

CTA was performed with 3 tube voltages in combination with various effective tube-current settings by using a 64-section scanner (Aquilion 64, Toshiba Medical Systems) (Table). For all CTA, we kept constant the following parameters: detector configuration of 64 × 0.5 mm, section thickness of 0.5 mm, reconstruction interval of 0.3 mm, beam pitch of 1.5:1, and table speed of 15 mm per gantry rotation (0.8-second gantry rotation time). CTA is routinely performed at 120 kVp and 200 mAs. Therefore, CTA without QDS at 120 kVp and 200 mAs was defined as the standard CTA.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Mean objective measurements of CNR and mean qualitative image scoresa

Filter Processing

The algorithms used in the QDS are shown in simplified form in Fig 1.3 For edge-detection processing, the edge elements that should be maintained are extracted from the input image by using the edge-detection filter. The extracted edge elements are used to calculate a suitable blending ratio (0 ≤ w ≤1) for the smoothed image and the sharpened image on the basis of the edge-sensitivity curve. Smoothing processing (low-pass filtering) was performed on the input image by using the smoothing filter to attenuate noise elements, while sharpening processing (high-pass filtering) was performed on the input image by using the sharpening filter to enhance the fine structures. The QDS reduces noise by increasing the blending ratio of the smoothed image in areas with low edge intensity, while maintaining the resolution in regions near the edges by increasing the blending ratio of the sharpened image in areas with high edge intensity. The edge-sensitivity curve was used to adjust the sensitivity for edges (the degree to which the edges are maintained) when blending the smoothed image and the sharpened image. Each type of filter processing was in 3D.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Flow chart depicts the basic processing steps of QDS used in the present study.

According to the coding of the manufacturer, the filters were classified as Q04, Q06, and Q08. The Q06 and Q08 are more aggressive than the Q04 in terms of the level of both smoothing and sharpening processing. The Q06 and Q08 use the different blending ratios of the smoothed and sharpened image. In comparison with Q06, the Q08 uses a higher ratio of the smoothed image and a lower ratio of the sharpened image. CTA was postprocessed with these 3 types of QDSs. Figures 2 and 3 show the MTF and Wiener noise power spectra. There was no meaningful difference in the MTF among the 4 subsets of CT images (Fig 2). The Wiener noise power spectra suggested that Q08 was the most effective in reducing image noise at all spatial frequencies, especially at lower spatial frequencies (Fig 3).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

MTF with a line-wire phantom for the original image and 3 QDS-processed images.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Wiener spectra with a line-wire phantom for the original image and 3 QDS-processed images.

Image Analysis

The original image and Q08-processed CTA were evaluated. For calculation of the CNR of the aneurysms with respect to the backgrounds, the mean CT number (attenuation) and SD (image noise) of 6 different aneurysms with a diameter of 6 mm in the vascular phantom were measured by placing a circular ROI in the center of the aneurysms on raw data images. The ROI area was kept to 18 mm2. Because it is impossible to set the 18-mm2 ROI on the 3-mm aneurysms, we evaluated only the 6-mm aneurysms. In addition, the CT numbers of the background (silicone rubber) were measured by using the same ROI cursor. The CNR was calculated as follows: (ROIa − ROIb) / SDb, where ROIa and ROIb are the CT numbers of the artery ROI and background ROI, and SDb (background noise) is the SD of the CT numbers of the background.

Two neuroradiologists evaluated the image quality of the CTA by consensus according to the depiction of 6 simulated aneurysms with a diameter of 3 mm and 6 blebs by using a 5-point score: 5 = excellent (an aneurysm or aneurysmal bleb was depicted with same quality, which was close to that at the schematic drawing), 4 = more than adequate (an aneurysm or aneurysmal bleb was clearly depicted, but image quality was somewhat reduced in comparison with that at the schematic drawing), 3 = adequate (depiction of the aneurysm or aneurysmal bleb was still sufficient), 2 = insufficient visualization, 1 = not visible.

Results

Among the 6 combinations of tube voltages and effective tube currents with lower CTDIw than the standard CTA (CTDIw = 48.0 mGy), the CTA with Q08 at 100 kVp and 250 mAs (CTDIw = 39.8 mGy) and the CTA with Q08 at 120 kVp and 150 mAs (CTDIw = 36.0 mGy) showed significantly better results for both CNR and mean qualitative image score at both concentrations of contrast material in comparison with the standard CTA without QDS (Fig 4), except for the qualitative imaging score with Q08 at 120 kVp and 150 mAs at 15 mg I/mL (Table).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

CTA without QDS with 120 kVp and 200 mAs (A) and Q08-processed CTA with 120 kVp and 150 mAs (B) from the superior view. For depiction of aneurysmal blebs on CTA at a concentration of 20 mg I/mL, the Q08-processed CTA at 120 kVp and 150 mAs (arrows) is superior to the CTA without QDS at 120 kVp and 200 mAs.

Discussion

The current quantitative analysis with Wiener noise power spectra demonstrated that the QDS successfully reduced image noise on CT images, and the MTF of the filtered images was not substantially altered from that of the original image. These results indicate that the resolution of structured objects was preserved while noise reduction in nonstructured regions was achieved. The primary aim of this study was to determine how the radiation dose can be reduced by the use of QDS without compromising the image quality of the CTA. Kalra et al2 evaluated the adaptive filter designed to improve the quality of abdominal CT images obtained at a reduced tube current. Our pooled data at 120 kV from the contrast material concentration of 20 mg I/mL were analyzed and showed that the CTAs at 150 mAs postprocessed with Q08 were significantly superior to the standard CTA at 200 mAs with regard to the CNR and qualitative image score. On the basis of our analysis at 120 kV, we concluded that the scanning postprocessed with Q08 permits a reduction of the radiation dose of at least 25% in comparison with the original images (CTDIw: 36.0 mGy at 150 mAs versus 48.0 mGy at 200 mAs).

There are some limitations in this study. In the 5-point analysis for the depiction of aneurysms, we used only the 3-mm aneurysms and blebs, because the 6-mm aneurysms could be detected too easily, which did not make any differences in the depiction among all the image protocols evaluated.

In conclusion, this phantom study demonstrated that the QDS reduced image noise without a perceptible loss of the delineation of structures of intracranial lesions and made it possible to reduce the radiation dose by 25% in intracranial CTA, while preserving the image quality or even allowing better image quality for the depiction of intracranial aneurysms and aneurysmal blebs.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Waaijer A,
    2. Prokop M,
    3. Velthuis BK,
    4. et al
    . Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality—reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings. Radiology 2007;242:832–39
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kalra MK,
    2. Maher MM,
    3. Sahani DV,
    4. et al
    . Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. Radiology 2003;228:251–56.Epub 2003 May 8
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Okumura M,
    2. Ota T,
    3. Kainuma K,
    4. et al
    . Effect of edge-preserving adaptive image filter on low-contrast detectability in CT systems: application of ROC analysis. Int J Biomed Imaging 2008:379–86. Epub 2008 Nov 16
  • Received February 12, 2009.
  • Accepted after revision June 30, 2009.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 31 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 31, Issue 5
1 May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reduction of the Radiation Dose for Multidetector Row CT Angiography of Cerebral Aneurysms Using an Edge-Preserving Adaptive Filter: A Vascular Phantom Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, M. Ogawa, K. Otsubo, Y. Morishita
Reduction of the Radiation Dose for Multidetector Row CT Angiography of Cerebral Aneurysms Using an Edge-Preserving Adaptive Filter: A Vascular Phantom Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2010, 31 (5) 827-829; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1798

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Reduction of the Radiation Dose for Multidetector Row CT Angiography of Cerebral Aneurysms Using an Edge-Preserving Adaptive Filter: A Vascular Phantom Study
S. Kakeda, Y. Korogi, M. Ogawa, K. Otsubo, Y. Morishita
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2010, 31 (5) 827-829; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1798
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Technique
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (2)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Minimizing Radiation Dose for Coronary CT Angiography
    Gabriel Vorobiof, Stephan Achenbach, Jagat Narula
    Cardiology Clinics 2012 30 1
  • Radiation Dose from Multidetector CT
    Sarabjeet Singh, Mannudeep K. Kalra
    2011

More in this TOC Section

  • Safety of Intrathecal Gadobutrol in Various Doses
  • Impact of Kidney Function on CNS Gadolinium Deposition in Patients Receiving Repeated Doses of Gadobutrol
  • Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Radiologic Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Emergency Setting
Show more PATIENT SAFETY

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire