Texture Analysis: A Review of Neurologic MR Imaging Applications

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Anderson RE,
   2. Hill RB,
   3. Key CR

   . The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades: toward an understanding of necessary fallibility. JAMA 1989;261:1610–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Engelhardt HT Jr.,
   2. Callahan D

   1. Gorovitz S,
   2. MacIntyre A

   . Toward a theory of medical fallibility. In: Engelhardt HT Jr., Callahan D eds. The Foundation of Ethics and Its Relationship to Science. Hastings-on-Hudson, New York: The Hastings Center; 1976: 248– 74
3. 3.↵
   1. Kaizer H

   . A quantification of textures on aerial photographs. Technical Note 121, AD 69484. Boston: Boston University Research Laboratory; 1955
4. 4.↵
   1. Darling EM,
   2. Joseph RD

   . Pattern recognition from satellite altitudes. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern 1968; 4: 38– 47

   CrossRef
5. 5.↵
   1. Hall EE,
   2. Kruger RP,
   3. Dwyer SJ,
   4. et al

   . A survey of preprocessing and feature extraction techniques for radiographic images. IEEE Transactions on Computers 1971;20:1032–44

   CrossRef
6. 6.↵
   1. Chien YP,
   2. Fu KS

   . Recognition of x-ray picture patterns. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1974;4:145–56
7. 7.↵
   1. Lerski RA,
   2. Barnett E,
   3. Morley P,
   4. et al

   . Computer analysis of ultrasonic signals in diffuse liver disease. Ultrasound Med Biol 1979;5:341–50

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Tourassi GD

   . Journey toward computer-aided diagnosis: role of image texture analysis. Radiology 1999;213:317–20

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Haralick RM,
   2. Shanmugam K,
   3. Dinstein I

   . Textural features for image classification. IEEE Tran Syst Man Cybern 1973;3:610–21

   CrossRef
10. 10.↵
    1. Julesz B,
    2. Gilbert EN,
    3. Shepp LA

    . Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in second-order statistics: revisited. Perception 1973;2:391–405

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Seppä M,
    2. Hämäläinen M

    . Visualizing human brain surface from T1-weighted MR images using texture-mapped triangle meshes. Neuroimage 2005;26:1–12

    PubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Mahmoud-Ghoneim D,
    2. Alkaabi MK,
    3. de Certaines JD,
    4. et al

    . The impact of image dynamic range on texture classification of brain white matter. BMC Med Imaging 2008;8:18

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Galloway MM

    . Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Comp Graph Image Proc 1975;4:172–79

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Weszka JS,
    2. Dyer CR,
    3. Rosenfeld A

    . Comparative-study of texture measures for terrain classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1976;6:269–85

    Web of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Conners RW,
    2. Harlow CA

    . A theoretical comparison of texture algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1980;2:204–22

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Tang X

    . Texture information in run-length matrices. IEEE Trans Image Proc 1998;7:1602–09

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Lerski RA,
    2. Straughan K,
    3. Schad LR,
    4. et al

    . MR image texture analysis: an approach to tissue characterization. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11:873–87

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Zhu H,
    2. Goodyear BG,
    3. Lauzon ML,
    4. et al

    . A new local multiscale Fourier analysis for medical imaging. Med Phys 2003;30:1134–41

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Mallat SG

    . A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. EEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1989;11:674–93

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Gabor D

    . Theory of communication. Part 3: frequency compression and expansion. J IEEE 1946;93(part III):445–57
21. 21.↵
    1. Daubechies I

    . Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Philadelphia: SIAM; 1992
22. 22.↵
    1. Stockwell RG

    . A basis for efficient representation of the S-transform. Digital Signal Processing 2007; 17: 371– 93

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Tong L,
    3. Wang L,
    4. et al

    . Texture analysis of multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:1160–66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Mayerhoefer ME,
    2. Breitenseher MJ,
    3. Kramer J,
    4. et al

    . Texture analysis for tissue discrimination on T1-weighted MR images of the knee joint in a multicenter study: transferability of texture features and comparison of feature selection methods and classifiers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:674–80

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Kassner A,
    2. Liu F,
    3. Thornhill RE,
    4. et al

    . Prediction of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke using texture analysis of postcontrast T1-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:933–41

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Hsu S-Y

    . The Mahalanobis classifier with the generalized inverse approach for automated analysis of imagery texture data. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 1979;9:117–34

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    1. Cover TM,
    2. Hart PE

    . Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1967;13:21–27

    CrossRefWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Georgiadis P,
    2. Cavouras D,
    3. Kalatzis I,
    4. et al

    . Enhancing the discrimination accuracy between metastases, gliomas and meningiomas on brain MRI by volumetric textural features and ensemble pattern recognition methods. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:120–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Tzacheva AA,
    2. Najarian K,
    3. Brockway JP

    . Breast cancer detection in gadolinium-enhanced MR images by static region descriptors and neural networks. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:337–42

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Georgiadis P,
    2. Cavouras D,
    3. Kalatzis I,
    4. et al

    . Improving brain tumor characterization on MRI by probabilistic neural networks and non-linear transformation of textural features. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2008;89:24–32

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Gibbs P,
    2. Turnbull LW

    . Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:92–98

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Jain AK,
    2. Duin RPW

    . Statistical pattern recognition: a review. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2000;22:4–37

    CrossRefWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Schad LR,
    2. Blüml S,
    3. Zuna I

    . MR tissue characterization of intracranial tumors by means of texture analysis. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11:889–96

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Earnest FT,
    2. Kelly PJ,
    3. Scheithauer BW,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral astrocytomas: histopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 1988;166:823–27

    PubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    1. Herlidou-Même S,
    2. Constans JM,
    3. Carsin B,
    4. et al

    . MRI texture analysis on texture test objects, normal brain and intracranial tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:989–93

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    1. Provenzale JM,
    2. Mukundan S,
    3. Barboriak DP

    . Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MR imaging for brain tumor characterization and assessment of treatment response. Radiology 2006;239:632–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Mahmoud-Ghoneim D,
    2. Toussaint G,
    3. Constans JM,
    4. et al

    . Three dimensional texture analysis in MRI: a preliminary evaluation in gliomas. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:983–87

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Brown R,
    2. Zlatescu M,
    3. Sijben A,
    4. et al

    . The use of magnetic resonance imaging to noninvasively detect genetic signatures in oligodendroglioma. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:2357–62

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Drabycz S,
    2. Roldán G,
    3. de Robles P,
    4. et al

    . An analysis of image texture, tumor location, and MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma using magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2009;49:1398–405.Epub 2009 Sep 28

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Mikulis DJ,
    2. Roberts TP

    . Neuro MR: protocols. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:838–47

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Barkovich AJ,
    2. Kuzniecky RI

    . Neuroimaging of focal malformations of cortical development. J Clin Neurophysiol 1996;13:481–94

    PubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Avoli M,
    2. Bernasconi A,
    3. Mattia D,
    4. et al

    . Epileptiform discharges in the human dysplastic neocortex: in vitro physiology and pharmacology. Ann Neurol 1999;46:816–26

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Bernasconi A,
    2. Antel SB,
    3. Collins DL,
    4. et al

    . Texture analysis and morphological processing of magnetic resonance imaging assist detection of focal cortical dysplasia in extra-temporal partial epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2001;49:770–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Antel SB,
    2. Collins DL,
    3. Bernasconi N,
    4. et al

    . Automated detection of focal cortical dysplasia lesions using computational models of their MRI characteristics and texture analysis. Neuroimage 2003;19:1748–59

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Yu O,
    2. Mauss Y,
    3. Namer IJ,
    4. et al

    . Existence of contralateral abnormalities revealed by texture analysis in unilateral intractable hippocampal epilepsy. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:1305–10

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    1. Sankar T,
    2. Bernasconi N,
    3. Kim H,
    4. et al

    . Temporal lobe epilepsy: differential pattern of damage in temporopolar cortex and white matter. Hum Brain Mapp 2008;29:931–44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    1. Bonilha L,
    2. Kobayashi E,
    3. Castellano G,
    4. et al

    . Texture analysis of hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsia 2003;44:1546–50

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Freeborough PA,
    2. Fox NC

    . MR image texture analysis applied to the diagnosis and tracking of Alzheimer's disease. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:475–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    1. Weinshenker BG,
    2. Bass B,
    3. Rice GPA,
    4. et al

    . The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain 1989;112:133–46

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
50. 50.↵
    1. Rovaris M,
    2. Confavreux C,
    3. Furlan R,
    4. et al

    . Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future challenges. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:343–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    1. Wolinsky JS

    . MRI aspects of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2002;8:85–87

    FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    1. Yu O,
    2. Mauss Y,
    3. Zollner G,
    4. et al

    . Distinct patterns of active and non-active plaques using texture analysis on brain NMR images in multiple sclerosis patients: preliminary results. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1261–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    1. Li DK,
    2. Paty DW

    . Magnetic resonance imaging results of the PRISMS trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of interferon-beta1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis—Prevention of Relapses and disability by Interferon-beta1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1999;46:197–206

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
54. 54.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Zhu H,
    3. Mitchell JR,
    4. et al

    . T2 MRI texture analysis is a sensitive measure of tissue injury and recovery resulting from acute inflammatory lesions in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2009;47:107–11

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
55. 55.↵
    1. Schmierer K,
    2. Scaravilli F,
    3. Altmann DR,
    4. et al

    . Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain. Ann Neurol 2004;56:407–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. 56.↵
    1. van Buchem MA,
    2. McGowan JC,
    3. Kolson DL,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative volumetric magnetization transfer analysis in multiple sclerosis: estimation of macroscopic and microscopic disease burden. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:632–36

    PubMedWeb of Science
57. 57.↵
    1. Davies GR,
    2. Altmann DR,
    3. Hadjiprocopis A,
    4. et al

    . Increasing normal-appearing gray and white matter magnetization transfer ratio abnormality in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2005;252:1037–44

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. 58.↵
    1. Tozer DJ,
    2. Marongiu G,
    3. Swanton JK,
    4. et al

    . Texture analysis of magnetization transfer maps from patients with clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:506–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
59. 59.↵
    1. Breij EC,
    2. Brink BP,
    3. Veerhuis R,
    4. et al

    . Homogeneity of active demyelinating lesions in established multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2008;63:16–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
60. 60.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Kaste M,
    3. Bluhmki E,
    4. et al

    . Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
61. 61.↵
    1. Waubant E

    . Biomarkers indicative of blood-brain barrier disruption in multiple sclerosis. Dis Markers 2006;22:235–44

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    1. Woods BJ,
    2. Clymer BD,
    3. Kurc T,
    4. et al

    . Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:495–501

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    1. Roberts H,
    2. Roberts T,
    3. Brasch R,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:891–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
64. 64.↵
    1. Tofts P,
    2. Kermode A

    . Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:357–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
65. 65.↵
    1. Larsson H,
    2. Stubgaard M,
    3. Frederiksen J,
    4. et al

    . Quantitation of blood–brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium-DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors. Magn Reson Med 1990;16:117–31

    CrossRefPubMed
66. 66.↵
    1. Kassner A,
    2. Roberts T,
    3. Taylor K,
    4. et al

    . Prediction of hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke using permeability MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2213–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
67. 67.↵
    1. Kassner A,
    2. Roberts TPL,
    3. Moran B,
    4. et al

    . Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator increases blood-brain barrier disruption in acute ischemic stroke: an MR imaging permeability study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1864–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
68. 68.↵
    1. Theocharakis P,
    2. Glotsos D,
    3. Kalatzis I,
    4. et al

    . Pattern recognition system for the discrimination of multiple sclerosis from cerebral microangiopathy lesions based on texture analysis of magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:417–22

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
69. 69.↵
    1. Zacharaki EI,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Chawla S,
    4. et al

    . Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:1609–18

    CrossRefPubMed