Normal Pituitary Stalk: High-Resolution MR Imaging at 3T

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hamilton BE,
   2. Salzman KL,
   3. Osborn AG

   . Anatomic and pathologic spectrum of pituitary infundibulum lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:W223–32

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Kanagaki M,
   2. Miki Y,
   3. Takahashi JA,
   4. et al

   . MRI and CT findings of neurohypophyseal germinoma. Eur J Radiol 2004;49:204–11

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Tien RD,
   2. Newton TH,
   3. McDermott MW,
   4. et al

   . Thickened pituitary stalk on MR images in patients with diabetes insipidus and Langerhans cell histiocytosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:703–08

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Sato N,
   2. Sze G,
   3. Endo K

   . Hypophysitis: endocrinologic and dynamic MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:439–44

   Abstract
5. 5.↵
   1. Bihan H,
   2. Christozova V,
   3. Dumas JL,
   4. et al

   . Sarcoidosis: clinical, hormonal, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations of hypothalamic-pituitary disease in 9 patients and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2007;86:259–68

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Peyster RG,
   2. Hoover ED,
   3. Adler LP

   . CT of the normal pituitary stalk. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1984;5:45–47

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Simmons GE,
   2. Suchnicki JE,
   3. Rak KM,
   4. et al

   . MR imaging of the pituitary stalk: size, shape, and enhancement pattern. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:375–77

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Araki Y,
   2. Ashikaga R,
   3. Takahashi S,
   4. et al

   . High signal intensity of the infundibular stalk on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:89–93

   Abstract
9. 9.↵
   1. Schmitz BL,
   2. Aschoff AJ,
   3. Hoffmann MH,
   4. et al

   . Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2229–37

   FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Kuhl CK,
    2. Traber F,
    3. Schild HH

    . Whole-body high-field-strength (3.0-T) MR imaging in clinical practice. Part I. Technical considerations and clinical applications. Radiology 2008;246:675–96

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Wolfsberger S,
    2. Ba-Ssalamah A,
    3. Pinker K,
    4. et al

    . Application of three-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and surgery of sellar lesions. J Neurosurg 2004;100:278–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Pinker K,
    2. Ba-Ssalamah A,
    3. Wolfsberger S,
    4. et al

    . The value of high-field MRI (3T) in the assessment of sellar lesions. Eur J Radiol 2005;54:327–34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Greitz T,
    2. Lofstedt S

    . The relationship between the third ventricle and the basilar artery. Acta Radiol 1954;42:85–100

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Shibata DK,
    2. Maravilla KR

    . Diverticulum of the third-ventricle infundibulum: a normal variant simulating an abnormality of the pituitary stalk on MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:423–24

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Elster AD

    . Modern imaging of the pituitary. Radiology 1993;187:1–14

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Elster AD

    . Imaging of the sella: anatomy and pathology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1993;14:182–94

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Castillo M

    . Pituitary gland: development, normal appearances, and magnetic resonance imaging protocols. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2005;16:259–68

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Timme W,
    2. Frantz AM,
    3. Hare CC

    1. Rasmussen AT

    . The proportions of the various subdivisons of the normal adult human hypophysis cerebri and the relative number of the different types of cells in pars distalis, with biometric evaluation of age and sex differences and special consideration of basophilic invasion into the infundibular process. In: Timme W, Frantz AM, Hare CC eds. The Pituitary Gland: An Investigation of the Most Recent Advances. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1938:118–50
19. 19.↵
    1. Yagishita A,
    2. Nakano I,
    3. Oda M,
    4. et al

    . Location of the corticospinal tract in the internal capsule at MR imaging. Radiology 1994;191:455–60

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Tien RD,
    2. Kucharczyk J,
    3. Bessette J,
    4. et al

    . MR imaging of the pituitary gland in infants and children: changes in size, shape, and MR signal with growth and development. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:1151–54

    PubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Miki Y,
    2. Asato R,
    3. Okumura R,
    4. et al

    . Anterior pituitary gland in pregnancy: hyperintensity at MR. Radiology 1993;187:229–31

    PubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Miki Y,
    2. Kataoka ML,
    3. Shibata T,
    4. et al

    . The pituitary gland: changes on MR images during the 1st year after delivery. Radiology 2005;235:999–1004

    CrossRefPubMed