Two-Year Follow-Up of Contrast Stasis within the Sac in Unruptured Aneurysm Coil Embolization: Progressive Thrombosis or Enlargement?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Deshaies EM,
   2. Adamo MA,
   3. Boulos AS

   . A prospective single-center analysis of the safety and efficacy of the HydroCoil embolization system for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2007;106:226–33

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Follow-up of treated aneurysms: the challenge of recurrences and potential solutions. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006;16:513–23, ix

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Kwon OK,
   2. Kim SH,
   3. Kwon BJ,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysms by using two microcatheters: techniques and outcomes in 25 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:894–900

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Slob MJ,
   2. Sluzewski M,
   3. van Rooij WJ

   . The relation between packing and reopening in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study. Neuroradiology 2005;47:942–45

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Sluzewski M,
   2. Menovsky T,
   3. van Rooij WJ,
   4. et al

   . Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:257–62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Tamatani S,
   2. Ito Y,
   3. Abe H,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:762–67

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Farb RI,
   2. Nag S,
   3. Scott JN,
   4. et al

   . Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:507–15

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Gauvrit JY,
   2. Leclerc X,
   3. Pernodet M,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: usefulness of 6-month imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:515–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Majoie CB,
    2. Sprengers ME,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. et al

    . MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1349–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Delcourt C,
    3. Bouquigny F,
    4. et al

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:744–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Shankar JJ,
    2. Lum C,
    3. Parikh N,
    4. et al

    . Long-term prospective follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling using contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1211–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Yamada N,
    2. Hayashi K,
    3. Murao K,
    4. et al

    . Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1154–57

    Abstract/FREE Full Text