Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine

Balloon-Related Complications and Technical Failures in Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Fractures

G. Saliou, D.R. Rutgers, E.M. Kocheida, G. Langman, A. Meurin, H. Deramond and P. Lehmann
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2010, 31 (1) 175-179; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1783
G. Saliou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.R. Rutgers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.M. Kocheida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Langman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Meurin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Deramond
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Lehmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to describe the immediate or early complications and technical failures occurring during balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) procedures and attributable to balloon inflation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive kyphoplasty procedures performed in our institution from May 2005 to October 2006. Fifty-one patients were treated by BKP at 75 spinal levels, and 137 vertebroplasties were performed as well.

RESULTS: Several recurrent complications or procedural failures were observed during BKP: cortical or endplate fracture by balloon expansion (4 vertebrae), partial vertebral re-collapse after deflation (4 vertebrae), balloon rupture during inflation (5 vertebrae), and transient hyperalgia after the procedure (11 patients, 27.5%).

CONCLUSIONS: Several symptomatic or asymptomatic complications and technical failures can occur during BKP. Some modifications of the usual kyphoplasty technique may decrease the frequency of these complications.

Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (BKP)1 is an interventional radiologic technique that has been used in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures due to various causes such as osteoporosis, metastases, or trauma.2,3 In BKP, inflated balloon tamps are used to restore the height of the vertebral body and correct kyphosis before injecting bone cement for stabilization of the fracture. The cavity created in the vertebral body is filled with cement after removal of the deflated balloons. Although fewer cement leakages are described with this technique than with vertebroplasty,2–4 some specific intraoperative complications can occur, especially during balloon inflation. The purpose of this article was to review the possible technical failures and complications in BKP that are related to balloon expansion inside the vertebral body and to discuss possible modifications of the usual kyphoplasty technique that can be applied to decrease the incidence of these events.

Materials and Methods

All consecutive patients who were referred to our radiology department for treatment of vertebral compression fractures between May 2005 and October 2006 were included. In this period, 51 patients (mean age, 69 years; range, 51–85 years; 16 men and 35 women) were treated by percutaneous kyphoplasty at 75 spinal levels. In addition, these patients underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty at 137 spinal levels. All patients underwent preprocedural conventional vertebral radiography, CT, and MR imaging of the spine before treatment, and radiography and CT after treatment. The etiology of the vertebral compression fractures was examined through histologic analysis of biopsies made before or during the intervention. The etiology was benign in 27 patients: osteoporosis (25 patients) and trauma (2 patients). A malignant etiology was found in 24 patients: multiple myeloma (17 patients), lymphoma (1 patient), and metastasis (6 patients). For all patients, the clinical indication for percutaneous treatment was spinal pain due to vertebral fracture. Vertebroplasty alone was performed if no fracture reduction was necessary. The indication for kyphoplasty was significant (ie, ≥20%) height loss of the vertebral body. Height loss was assessed before the treatment by analysis of the CT scans. Normal theoretic height of fractured vertebrae was assessed by calculating the mean height of the normal vertebrae below and above the fractured vertebra.

The mean time period between fracture and intervention was 69 ± 51 days (range, 5–180 days). An average of 1.5 vertebrae per patient was treated by percutaneous kyphoplasty, and an average of 2.7 vertebrae, by percutaneous vertebroplasty. The average number of vertebral levels treated for each session was 3.3 levels (average number of treatment sessions, 1.25 per patient). The treated vertebral levels were T4 (1 vertebra, 1.3% of treated vertebrae), T5 (2, 2.6%), T6 (2, 2.6%), T7 (2, 2.6%), T8 (6, 8%), T9 (4, 5.3%), T10 (1, 1.3%), T11 (4, 5.3%), T12 (17, 22.6%), L1 (12, 16%), L2 (10, 13.3%), L3 (5, 6.6%), L4 (5, 6.6%), and L5 (4, 5.3%).

Kyphoplasty Procedure

All BKPs were performed by an experienced interventional neuroradiologist.

Procedures were performed in an angiography room with biplane control (C-arm angiographic unit, AdvantX; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin), associated with a mobile angiographic unit (Siremobile 2000; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) under aseptic conditions. The treatment was applied with the patient under general anesthesia. BKP was performed according to the usual percutaneous kyphoplasty technique.1 Thirteen-gauge needles were used to puncture the vertebra and to introduce the 7-gauge KyphX Osteo-Introducer (Kyphon, Sunnyvale, California) inside the posterior part of the vertebral body. Balloons were 15 mm long at superior thoracic levels (above T8) (K09A, Kyphon) and 20 mm long from T8 to L5 (K09A, Kyphon). Balloons were positioned inside the vertebral body via a bilateral transpedicular (thoracic level) or lateropedicular (lumbar level) approach by using an introducer system. The 2 balloons were then inflated with contrast medium under barometric control. The maximum balloon inflation pressure was 400 psi. The maximum inflated volume was 4 mL for a 15-mm-long peanut-shaped balloon and 6 mL for a 20-mm-long peanut-shaped balloon. After deflation and removal of the balloons, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement was injected at low pressure into the cavity created, to stabilize the vertebral fracture. Intravertebral injection was performed under lateral and anteroposterior fluoroscopy. All kyphoplasty procedures were performed with PMMA (KyphX HV-R, Kyphon).

In case of re-collapse of the vertebra after balloon deflation, the BKP technique was modified to avoid loss of fracture reduction after balloon deflation. The BKP technique was begun as usual, and the balloons were inflated to reduce the vertebral fracture. When a loss of fracture reduction was observed after deflating the balloons, as opposed to the conventional technique earlier described in “Materials and Methods,” the 2 balloons were re-inflated to the same volume and pressure. Only 1 balloon was then deflated and removed instead of the 2 balloons. The balloon that was not deflated was designed to maintain the maximum fracture reduction initially obtained with the 2 balloons. Cement was injected at low pressure into the hemivertebra that did not contain the inflated balloon. After polymerization of the cement in this hemivertebra, the second balloon was deflated and removed and cement was injected into the ipsilateral hemivertebra. We called this technique “maximum fracture reduction.”

The efficacy of the treatment was assessed by scoring the level of pain before and after treatment on a visual analog pain scale ranging from 0 to 10 (no distress to unbearable distress).

Statistics

Complications and technical failures evaluated included the following: cortical or endplate fracture by balloon expansion, transient hyperalgesia, balloon rupture during inflation, and partial vertebral re-collapse after balloon deflation. The incidence of these complications and technical failures is reported as numbers and/or percentages.

Results

Two days after BKP, 92% of patients had a reduction of at least 3 levels on the visual analog pain scale. The incidence of cement leakage in kyphoplasty (assessed by control CT after the treatment) was 33% for the total number of treated vertebrae. We did not observe any complication due to cement leakage. Among vertebrae treated by BKP, several complications and technical failures due to balloon expansion were observed in 13 vertebrae (17.3%) (Table).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Vertebrae data and complication rates

First, we observed cortical or endplate fracture by balloon expansion in 4 vertebrae of 4 patients (mean age, 72 years; range, 62–78 years): 3 with osteoporosis and 1 with a myeloma (Fig 1). In 1 female patient (78 years of age with a myeloma), endplate fracture by balloon expansion led to a procedural fracture of an adjacent vertebral body (Fig 2). Second, we found vertebral re-collapse after deflation in 4 vertebrae of 4 patients (2 men and 2 women; mean age, 67 years; range, 50–82 years; mean re-collapse angle, 5°; Fig 3). Re-collapse was not related to a low clinical success; 100% of patients with re-collapse showed improvement of pain after treatment. The technique of maximum fracture reduction, as described in “Materials and Methods,” was used successfully in 2 of the 4 patients with vertebral fracture re-collapse after balloon deflation. Loss of local kyphosis reduction after balloon deflation was 4° and 9° for these 2 patients. The maximum fracture reduction technique restored the angle initially obtained. An analgesic effect was observed in both patients with no mortality or morbidity. Third, we observed balloon rupture during inflation in 5 vertebrae of 5 patients (2 men and 3 women; mean age, 62 years; range, 51–80 years): 2 with osteoporosis, 1 with trauma, 1 with lymphoma, and 1 with multiple myelomas (Fig 4).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Thoracic balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) for vertebral fracture due to multiple myelomas. Note anterolateral cement leakage due to a focal cortical fracture caused by balloon inflation (arrows).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A, Patient with multiple vertebral fractures due to multiple myelomas. Lateral view of T4, T5, and T6 before treatment. B and C, Superior endplate fracture of T5 during balloon inflation responsible for inferior endplate fracture of T4 (arrow) during the kyphoplasty procedure at T5, lateral (B) and anteroposterior views (C). D, Final lateral view after cement injection. T4 and T6 vertebroplasty was performed at the same time.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A, Maximal fracture reduction technique for a patient with L1 vertebral fracture due to osteoporosis. A−D, and I: Lateral view. E−G, and H, Frontal view. B, Initial balloon inflation leads to partial kyphosis correction (local kyphosis angle = 9°). C, Fracture reduction loss after balloon deflation (local kyphosis angle = 18°). D, Re-inflation of the 2 balloons to restore maximum fracture reduction. E and F, Deflation of only 1 balloon (E) and cement injection in the same side (F). G and H, After polymethylmethacrylate polymerization, deflation of the second balloon (G) and cement injection on the same side (H). I, Final view showing maintenance of the initial fracture reduction (local kyphosis angle = 9°).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

A, T12 BKP for vertebral fracture due to osteoporosis (frontal view). B and C, Balloon rupture responsible for anterior and lateral contrast leakage into the soft tissues (arrows). No arteriovenous leakage is seen. D, CT scan, final sagittal view showing anterior soft-tissue contrast leakage (arrows).

When balloon rupture occurred, we observed that contrast agent did not leak into veins or arteries in any of the patients in this series but predominantly remained inside the vertebral body with minor contrast agent leakage through the fracture line into the paravertebral space. Finally, we found that 11 patients (21.5%) had transient hyperalgesia after the procedure (3 men; 8 women; mean age, 72 years; range, 52–82 years): 4 with myelomas, 4 with osteoporosis, 1 with trauma, 2 with metastases. In 9 of these patients, kyphoplasty alone was performed (9 vertebrae). In this selective subgroup, 3 patients (33%) experienced transient hyperalgesia.

Discussion

We observed 4 types of complications and technical failures during BKP: cortical fracture during inflation, vertebral fracture re-collapse after balloon deflation, balloon rupture during inflation, and transient hyperalgesia.

Cortical Fracture during Inflation

If a cortical fracture occurs in the vertebral endplates, the inflated balloon can reach an adjacent vertebra when the intervertebral disk is thin and damage this adjacent vertebra. Four focal cortical fractures due to balloon expansion were observed in our study, and an adjacent vertebral fracture occurred procedurally due to expansion of the balloon through the vertebral endplate and the adjacent intervertebral disk. A predisposing factor for cortical fracture may be the presence of heterogeneous bone structure in a vertebra. This can lead to nonuniform balloon expansion during BKP and subsequent cortical fracture. Previously, we described a technique called “controlled segmental balloon kyphoplasty,” which allows controlled reduction of fractures in vertebrae with heterogeneous bone structure.5 In case of nonuniform expansion of balloons during inflation, we use that technique to decrease the risk of cortical fracture during inflation.

Vertebral Fracture Re-Collapse after Balloon Deflation

Some vertebral fractures can be spontaneously mobile, such as fractures with osteonecrosis.6 In our experience, these fractures are usually easily reduced by the inflatable balloon tamp because of their mobility. However, after deflation of the balloon, loss of fracture reduction can be observed7 with loss of kyphosis angle reduction. This forms a weakness of the kyphoplasty technique. Cement injection into the vertebral body is performed under low pressure and is unable to restore the loss of fracture reduction. The risk of cement leakage is increased when cement is injected at high pressure or when more cement is injected than the capacity of the cavity created in the vertebral body.

Four patients in the present study developed visible loss of fracture reduction after balloon deflation. Two patients were successfully treated by the maximum fracture reduction technique. Although based on a small population, this adaptation of the kyphoplasty technique avoided loss of fracture reduction during the procedure. In this limited series, no case of anterior cement leakage or complication was observed with this technique. Kissing balloons, which can occur during inflation when the balloons are located too medially, must be avoided. Excessive contact between cement and balloon, when the cement is injected into 1 side of the vertebra while maintaining an inflated balloon in the other side, can result in damage to the balloon because PMMA polymerizes via an exothermic reaction,8–10 releasing heat.

Balloon Rupture during Inflation

Although in itself not necessarily a technical failure or complication, balloon rupture is an unwanted event during the procedure because it may lead, for example, to contrast leakage or procedural delay. Contrast agent did not leak into veins or arteries in any of the patients with balloon rupture in our study but, predominantly, remained inside or close to the vertebral body. This can probably be explained by the fact that in the case of balloon rupture, the pressure in the vertebra rapidly decreases and contrast agent is not pushed into paravertebral vessels. The cavity created before balloon rupture also probably provides a reservoir for contrast agent.

No symptomatic complication due to balloon rupture (ie, gas embolism) was observed in this series. In the technique of BKP, balloons must be purged of any trapped air before insertion to prevent gas embolism in the event of balloon rupture. Balloon rupture appears to be facilitated by sharp solid bone fragments. In our experience, the risk of balloon rupture can be decreased by very slowly increasing balloon inflation pressures, which appears to allow the shape of the balloon to adapt to the solid and sharp bony environment. An alternative or additional way to limit balloon rupture consists of using a curette to break bone bridges and contusive bone fragments before inflating the balloon.

Transient Hyperalgesia

Transient hyperalgesia has been described after acrylic cement injection into the acetabulum11 or after vertebroplasty procedures in <3% of cases.12,13 Few publications have reported transient hyperalgesia after kyphoplasty.14 Transient hyperalgesia consists of accentuation or recurrence of pain early after the procedure. The polymerization of the cement that is injected during the BKP procedure leads to an exothermic reaction. The reported cause of pain was a local inflammatory response due to that exothermic reaction.14,15 Transient hyperalgesia has been treated by steroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. An increased incidence of hyperalgesia (21.5%) was observed after kyphoplasty in our study group. In 9 patients, kyphoplasty alone was performed (9 vertebrae) without additional vertebroplasty. In this selective subgroup, 3 patients (33%) experienced transient hyperalgesia after the procedure. All patients were treated by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ketoprofen, 200 mg/day for 5 days), allowing resolution of pain after several days. The incidence of hyperalgesia in this subgroup of 9 kyphoplasty patients appears to be higher than that in vertebroplasty, according to the reported values for vertebroplasty in the literature.12,13

We hypothesize that hyperalgesia in kyphoplasty is related to balloon inflation that can cause paravertebral soft-tissue distraction. The trocars used for kyphoplasty (7 gauge) are also larger than those used for vertebroplasty (usually ≤10 gauge). These trocars can cause more soft-tissue or bone damage in the access route than in the vertebroplasty procedure. Moreover, the access used for the kyphoplasty procedures in our patients was a lateropedicular route, whereas the access for vertebroplasty was transpedicular. At thoracic levels, the lateropedicular route goes through the costovertebral joint. Possibly, this is associated with more frequent hyperalgesia. In our study group, among the 11 patients who had a transient hyperalgesia, 9 underwent kyphoplasty at a thoracic level and only 2 patients, at a lumbar level. We have the impression that that access results in more frequent transient hyperalgesia when it is at thoracic levels through the costovertebral joint.

Conclusions

Although several complications due to systemic disease, anesthesia, or access route have been described during kyphoplasty procedures, only a few complications or technical failures due to balloon inflation have been reported. The present series illustrates complications and technical failures in kyphoplasty that may be related to balloon inflation. Some modifications of the usual kyphoplasty technique may decrease the incidence of these complications.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Garfin SR,
    2. Yuan HA,
    3. Reiley MA.
    . New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 2001; 26: 1511–15
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bouza C,
    2. Lopez T,
    3. Magro A,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 1050–67
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Taylor RS,
    2. Fritzell P,
    3. Taylor RJ.
    . Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 1085–100
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Coumans JV,
    2. Reinhardt MK,
    3. Lieberman IH.
    . Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: 1-year clinical outcomes from a prospective study. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 44–50
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Saliou G,
    2. Lehmann P,
    3. Vallee JN.
    . Controlled segmental balloon kyphoplasty: a new technique for patients with heterogeneous vertebral bone density. Spine 2008; 33: E216–220
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Libicher M,
    2. Appelt A,
    3. Berger I,
    4. et al
    . The intravertebral vacuum phenomen as specific sign of osteonecrosis in vertebral compression fractures: results from a radiological and histological study. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2248–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Voggenreiter G.
    . Balloon kyphoplasty is effective in deformity correction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 2005; 30: 2806–12
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Deramond H,
    2. Wright NT,
    3. Belkoff SM.
    . Temperature elevation caused by bone cement polymerization during vertebroplasty. Bone 1999; 25: 17S–21S
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Provenzano MJ,
    2. Murphy KP,
    3. Riley LH 3rd.
    . Bone cements: review of their physiochemical and biochemical properties in percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 1286–90
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. San Millan Ruiz D,
    2. Burkhardt K,
    3. Jean B,
    4. et al
    . Pathology findings with acrylic implants. Bone 1999; 25: 85S–90S
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Cotten A,
    2. Deprez X,
    3. Migaud H,
    4. et al
    . Malignant acetabular osteolyses: percutaneous injection of acrylic bone cement. Radiology 1995; 197: 307–10
    PubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Cotten A,
    2. Dewatre F,
    3. Cortet B,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 1996; 200: 525–30
    PubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Weill A,
    2. Chiras J,
    3. Simon JM,
    4. et al
    . Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology 1996; 199: 241–47
    PubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Watts NB,
    2. Harris ST,
    3. Genant HK.
    . Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12: 429–37
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Chiras J,
    2. Depriester C,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al
    . Percutaneous vertebral surgery: technics and indications [in French]. J Neuroradiol 1997; 24: 45–59
    PubMed
  • Received April 2, 2009.
  • Accepted after revision June 16, 2009.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 31 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 31, Issue 1
1 Jan 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Balloon-Related Complications and Technical Failures in Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Fractures
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
G. Saliou, D.R. Rutgers, E.M. Kocheida, G. Langman, A. Meurin, H. Deramond, P. Lehmann
Balloon-Related Complications and Technical Failures in Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Fractures
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2010, 31 (1) 175-179; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1783

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Balloon-Related Complications and Technical Failures in Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Fractures
G. Saliou, D.R. Rutgers, E.M. Kocheida, G. Langman, A. Meurin, H. Deramond, P. Lehmann
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2010, 31 (1) 175-179; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1783
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Armed Kyphoplasty: An Indirect Central Canal Decompression Technique in Burst Fractures
  • Crossref (12)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Balloon kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
    Douglas Wardlaw, Jan Van Meirhaeghe, Jonas Ranstam, Leonard Bastian, Steven Boonen
    Expert Review of Medical Devices 2012 9 4
  • Efficacy of the Vertebral Body Stenting System for the Restoration of Vertebral Height in Acute Traumatic Compression Fractures in a Non-osteoporotic Population
    Julien Garnon, Benjamin Doré, Pierre Auloge, Jean Caudrelier, Danoob Dalili, Nitin Ramamurthy, Guillaume Koch, Roberto Luigi Cazzato, Afshin Gangi
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2019 42 11
  • Should we fear cement leakage during kyphoplasty in percutaneous traumatic spine surgery? A single experience with 76consecutive cases
    C. Capel, A. Fichten, B. Nicot, M. Lefranc, P. Toussaint, C. Desenclos, H. Deramond, D. Le Gars, J. Peltier
    Neurochirurgie 2014 60 6
  • Armed Kyphoplasty: An Indirect Central Canal Decompression Technique in Burst Fractures
    A. Venier, L. Roccatagliata, M. Isalberti, P. Scarone, D.E. Kuhlen, M. Reinert, G. Bonaldi, J.A. Hirsch, A. Cianfoni
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2019
  • Safety of vertebral augmentation with cranio-caudal expansion implants in vertebral compression fractures with posterior wall protrusion
    Louis Meyblum, Kévin Premat, Mahmoud Elhorany, Eimad Shotar, Évelyne Cormier, Vincent Degos, Hugues Pascal-Mousselard, Sylvie Rosenberg, Frédéric Clarençon, Jacques Chiras
    European Radiology 2020 30 10
  • Cement Augmentation for Single-Level Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: Comparison of Vertebroplasty With High-Viscosity Cement and Kyphoplasty
    Tung-Yi Lin, Yung-Chuan Liu, Ying-Chih Wang, Chia-Wei Chang, Chak-Bor Wong, Tsai-Sheng Fu
    World Neurosurgery 2020 141
  • Rare Episode of Cement Leakage During Vesselplasty in a Case of Vertebral Compression Fracture
    Kuei-Lin Yeh, Szu-Hsien Wu, Shing-Sheng Wu, Shu-Hao Chang
    World Neurosurgery 2020 137
  • Risk Factors for Residual Back Pain After Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture
    Hamidullah Salimi, Shinji Takahashi, Masatoshi Hoshino, Yusuke Hori, Hiroyuki Yasuda, Tadao Tsujio, Shoichiro Ohyama, Hidetomi Terai, Hiromitsu Toyoda, Akinobu Suzuki, Hiroshi Kono, Sho Dohzono, Koji Tamai, Hiroaki Nakamura
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 2024 58 5
  • Balloon Kyphoplasty Complication: A Case of a Lodged Balloon Within the Vertebral Body
    Grace Chalhoub, Brian Cheung, Christian Gonzalez
    Cureus 2020
  • Beyond Pain Relief: An In-Depth Review of Vertebral Height Restoration After Balloon Kyphoplasty in Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Siddharth K Patel, Sohael Khan, Ventaktesh Dasari, Suvarn Gupta
    Cureus 2023

More in this TOC Section

  • Bern Score Validity for SIH
  • MP2RAGE 7T in MS Lesions of the Cervical Spine
  • Resisted Inspiration for CSF-Venous Fistula
Show more Spine

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire