Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 1: Physical Principles

References

1. ↵
   Robb RA. The dynamic spatial reconstructor: an x-ray video-fluoroscopic CT scanner for dynamic volume imaging of moving organs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1982;1:22–33

   CrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD, for the Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;19:814–20. Epub 2008 Apr 23

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Dörfler A, Struffert T, Engelhorn T, et al. Rotational flat-panel computed tomography in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology. Rofo 2008;180:891–98

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Moore CJ, Am A, Marchant T, et al. Developments in and experience of kilovoltage x-ray cone beam image-guided radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2006;79 (Spec No 1):S66–78

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Hounsfield GN. Nobel Award address: computed medical imaging. Med Phys 1980;7:283–90

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Seeram E. Computed Tomography: Physical Principles, Clinical Applications, and Quality Control. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders;2001 :2–3
7. ↵
   Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:75–80

   PubMed
8. ↵
   Gupta R, Grasruck M, Suess C, et al. Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1191–205. Epub 2006 Mar 10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Baba R, Konno Y, Ueda K, et al. Comparison of flat-panel detector and image-intensifier detector for cone-beam CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2002;26:153–58

   CrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 1984;A1:612–19

    CrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Yan XH, Leahy RM. Derivation and analysis of a filtered backprojection algorithm for cone beam projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:462–72

    CrossRefPubMed
12. ↵
    Kudo H, Noo F, Defrise M, et al. New super-short-scan algorithm for fan-beam and cone-beam reconstruction. IEEE NSS-MIC 2002;902–06
13. ↵
    Gupta R, Bartling SH, Basu SK, et al. Experimental flat-panel high-spatial-resolution volume CT of the temporal bone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1417–24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. Med Phys 2001;28:220–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Graham SA, Moseley DJ, Siewerdsen JH, et al. Compensators for dose and scatter management in cone-beam computed tomography. Med Phys 2007;34:2691–703

    CrossRefPubMed
16. ↵
    Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Bakhtiar B, et al. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors. Med Phys 2004;31:3506–20

    CrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    Ning R, Chen B, Yu R, et al. Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000;19:949–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Fahrig R, Dixon R, Payne T, et al. Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. Med Phys 2006;33:4541–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Neitzel U. Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation. Med Phys 1992;19:475–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Nickoloff EL, Lu ZF, Dutta A, et al. Influence of flat-panel fluoroscopic equipment variables on cardiac radiation doses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007;30:169–76

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Wiegert J, Bertram M, Schafer D, et al. Soft tissue contrast resolution within the head of human cadaver by means of flat detector based cone-beam CT. Proc SPIE 2004;5368:330–37

    CrossRef
22. ↵
    Jarry G, Graham SA, Moseley DJ, et al. Characterization of scattered radiation in kV CBCT images using Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys 2006;33:4320–29

    CrossRefPubMed
23. Siewerdsen JH, Daly MJ, Bakhtiar B, et al. A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2006;33:187–97

    CrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    Ning R, Tang X, Conover D. X-ray scatter correction algorithm for cone beam CT imaging. Med Phys 2004;31:1195–202

    CrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    Malusek A, Sandborg M, Carlsson GA. Simulation of scatter in cone beam CT: effect on projection image quality. Proc SPIE 2003;5030:740–51

    CrossRef
26. ↵
    Cowen AR, Kengyelics SM, Davies AG. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Clin Radiol 2008;63:487–98. Epub 2008 Jan 31

    CrossRefPubMed
27. ↵
    Roos PG, Colbeth RE, Mollov I, et al. Multiple gain ranging readout method to extend the dynamic range of amorphous silicon flat panel imagers. Proc SPIE 2004;5368:139–49

    CrossRef
28. ↵
    Akpek S, Brunner T, Benndorf G, et al. Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005;11:10–13

    PubMed
29. ↵
    Cowen AR, Davies AG, Sivananthan MU. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography. Clin Radiol 2008;63:1073–85

    CrossRefPubMed
30. ↵
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Vereecken L, et al. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:630–37

    CrossRefPubMed
31. Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, et al. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:923–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. ↵
    Völk M, Paetzel C, Angele P, et al. Routine skeleton radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality and clinical acceptance at 50% dose reduction. Invest Radiol 2003;38:230–35

    CrossRefPubMed
33. ↵
    Farman TT, Vandre RH, Pajak JC, et al. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:219–23. Epub 2005 Nov 11

    CrossRefPubMed
34. ↵
    Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, et al. CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics 2008;28:245–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. ↵
    Mori S, Endo M, Nishizawa K, et al. Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry. Med Phys 2005;32:1061–69

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. ↵
    Kyriakou Y, Deak P, Langner O, et al. Concepts for dose determination in flat-detector CT. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:3551–66. Epub 2008 Jun 13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. ↵
    Peltonen LI, Aarnisalo AA, Kortesniemi MK, et al. Limited cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the middle ear: a comparison with multislice helical computed tomography. Acta Radiol 2007;48:207–12

    CrossRefPubMed
38. ↵
    Daly MJ, Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, et al. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. Med Phys 2006;33:3767–80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    Jackman AH, Palmer JN, Chiu AG, et al. Use of intraoperative CT scanning in endoscopic sinus surgery: a preliminary report. Am J Rhinol 2008;22:170–74

    CrossRefPubMed
40. ↵
    Alspaugh J, Christodoulou E, Goodsitt M, et al. Dose and image quality of flat-panel detector volume computed tomography for sinus imaging. Med Phys 2007;34:2634
41. ↵
    Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:640.e1–5

    CrossRefPubMed
42. Loubele, M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2008 Jul 16. [Epub ahead of print]
43. ↵
    Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:106–14. Epub 2008 May 27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science