Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleFunctional

Precision of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Use of Different Quantification Methods for Hypercapnia Functional MR Imaging

S.D. Goode, S. Krishan, C. Alexakis, R. Mahajan and D.P. Auer
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 972-977; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1496
S.D. Goode
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Krishan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Alexakis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Mahajan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.P. Auer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tools for noninvasive mapping of hemodynamic function including cerebrovascular reactivity are emerging and may become clinically useful to predict tissue at hemodynamic risk. One such technique assesses blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) MR imaging contrast in response to hypercapnia, but the reliability of its quantification is uncertain. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the intersubject and interhemispheric variability and short-term reproducibility of hypercapnia functional MR imaging (fMRI) in healthy volunteers and to assess the effects of different methods of quantification and normalization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers, (7 women and 9 men) underwent hypercapnia fMRI with a clinical 1.5T scanner; 8 underwent scanning twice. We determined BOLD amplitude changes using a visually defined block design or automated regression to end-tidal (ET) carbon dioxide (CO2). Absolute percent signal intensity changes (PSC) were extracted for whole-brain, gray matter, and middle cerebral artery territory, and also normalized to ETCO2 change. Intersubject and intrasubject (between hemispheres and sessions) coefficients of variation (COV) were derived. We assessed the effects of different quantification methods on reproducibility indices using the t test and U tests.

RESULTS: The mean change in ETCO2 was 7.8 ± 3.3 mm Hg. Averaged BOLD increases varied from 2.54% to 2.92%. Short-term reproducibility was good for absolute PSC (4.8% to 10%) but poor for normalized PSC (range, 24% to 27% COV). Intersubject reproducibility varied between 11% and 23% for absolute PSC and, again, was poorer for normalized data (32% to 39%). Interhemispheric reproducibility of absolute PSC was excellent ranging between 1.24 and 2.16% COV.

CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, quantification of cerebrovascular reactivity with use of hypercapnia fMRI was found to have good between-session and very good interhemispheric reproducibility. The technique holds promise as a diagnostic tool, especially for sensitive detection of unilateral disease.

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is tightly controlled to meet metabolic demands according to neural activity levels and to counterbalance systemic variation in blood pressure. Several control mechanisms are integrated to maintain adequate cerebral tissue perfusion. Metabolic, myogenic, and local mechanisms interact to maintain constant CBF despite wide variations in arterial blood pressure, referred to as cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovascular reserve (CVR) reflects the spare capacity of the cerebral circulation to increase CBF in response to regulatory vasodilatory stimuli. The main cerebral vasodilatory stimulus is carbon dioxide (CO2); hence, exogenous CO2 and acetazolamide have been used to assess CVR. Alterations in these cerebral hemodynamic control parameters are present in various disease states1–4 with increasingly recognized pathophysiologic relevance. Tools for noninvasive mapping of cerebrovascular parameters including CVR would thus be desirable to complement emerging physiologic imaging techniques to predict tissue at hemodynamic risk.5–7

Many techniques have been developed for noninvasive assessment of CVR. In a clinical setting, measurements of CVR are performed with use of transcranial Doppler (TCD), by quantifying change in flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) on a vasodilatory challenge such as hypercapnia, apnea, or acetazolamide. Positron-emission tomography and single-photon emission CT (SPECT) have also been used to detect and locate quantitative brain perfusion changes with similar stimuli.8–10 However, these latter 2 techniques are not widely available, are expensive, and involve significant radiation, therefore limiting their clinical usability. More recently, the blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) functional MR imaging (fMRI) technique has been applied to assess CVR in healthy volunteers and in patients,5,7,11–13 but the quantitative reliability is uncertain. Recent publications have also shown the value of hypercapnia BOLD fMRI to predict normal and abnormal hemispheric CVR.14

BOLD fMRI is sensitive to changes in the local deoxyhemoglobin concentration, which varies with perfusion and blood volume changes in a complex but qualitatively predictable manner. BOLD contrast is based on the fact that deoxyhemoglobin acts as an endogenous contrast agent. BOLD hypercapnia fMRI detects increase in tissue oxygenation resulting from increases in CBF induced by CO2 inhalation while demands in oxidative metabolism remain constant. This mechanism leads to an observed BOLD signal intensity increase related to measurable T2* prolongation. Over a reasonable range of increases in CO2, there is a linear increase in CBF and cerebral blood volume (CBV) with an exponential plateauing close to maximal dilation.15,16 It has previously been assumed that BOLD signal intensity increases also linearly with CO2, but this is speculative and more recent theoretic models of hemodynamic BOLD response suggest a nonlinear relationship.17–19 Previous studies have used simple ratios to normalize fMRI response to varying levels of hypercapnia expressed as % BOLD signal intensity or %R2*change/mm HG end-tidal (ET)CO2 change.5,7,12,20 The validity of this approach has not been tested.

There are potential advantages of this technique versus TCD because BOLD fMRI assesses the hemodynamic effects on tissue oxygenation rather than blood flow velocity. It is noteworthy that BOLD hypercapnia fMRI 1) affords whole-brain mapping and, hence, assessment of regional heterogeneity and 2) is sensitive to vasodilatory effects mediated by collateral arteries, inaccessible to TCD techniques. The disadvantage of hypercapnia fMRI is its semiquantitative nature and complex dependence on blood flow and volume changes and on the ratio between arterial and venous blood volume. Arterial spin-labeling (ASL) would be a quantitative method to directly assess CBF and, hence, CVR; however ASL has poor signal-to-noise intensity at 1.5T, which is still currently the main clinical platform for MR imaging.

Current clinical practice is to increasingly offer brain MR imaging to patients with cerebral ischemia (stroke and transient ischemic attack) that would allow for uncomplicated routine use of an integrated CVR assessment. Application of such a technique to map CVR would be extremely useful in patients with a hemodynamically significant brain lesion such as an arteriovenous malformation whereby the normal autoregulatory mechanisms have been altered, or in patients with intracranial or extracranial steno-occlusive disease to evaluate future stroke risk, perhaps even as a risk stratification tool for carotid intervention. However, the clinical usefulness of such a test is dependent on sufficient reliability and reproducibility of the diagnostic test.

Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the reliability of a standardized quantitative hypercapnia fMRI protocol with use of a clinical 1.5T scanner. Specifically, we aimed to assess intrasubject and intersubject reproducibility for different analysis techniques and CO2 normalization. For the different analysis techniques, we determined BOLD amplitude changes by using a visually defined block design or automated regression to ETCO2.

Materials and Methods

Study Sample

Sixteen healthy volunteers (7 women and 9 men with a mean age of 27.7 years (age range, 19–34 years)) without neurologic signs and symptoms and no medical or drug history were included in the study after giving informed written consent. All subjects were medication free and were asked not to consume caffeine for the 4 hours before the scanning session. Eight subjects underwent subsequent scans on the same day after a 30-minute break outside the scanner. The hospital research and development department and medical school research ethics committee approved the study.

MR Imaging

MR imaging studies were performed on a clinical 1.5T scanner (Intera; Philips, Best, the Netherlands). A standard 8-channel head coil was used for imaging, with use of a gradient-echo echo-planar sequence with the following parameters: TR, 3500 ms; TE, 60 ms; flip angle, 90°; matrix size, 64 × 64; FOV, 192 mm; sections, 33; thickness, 3 mm; and no gap. A total of 160 volumes (approximately 9 minutes acquisition time) were acquired for each experiment.

CO2 Stimulation

We controlled ETCO2 by using a standard nonrebreathing anesthetic circuit with 2 one-way valves to prevent rebreathing. The circuit incorporated a reservoir bag of 2 L to compensate for any large tidal volume breaths. Subjects breathed through a comfortably secure standard anesthetic mask to ensure a closed circuit. ETCO2 was continuously monitored via a sampling tube at the mouthpiece level. ETCO2 recordings were made during the entire experiment, and a reading was taken every 3.5 s to correlate with the length of time of each volume acquisition or 1 dynamic (ie, 1 TR).

We used free gas flow of 1-L/min O2 and 8-L/min air and then provided a fixed amount of CO2 (1 L/min), therefore providing 10% CO2. Control of CO2 gas flow was via an external source outside of the MR imaging scanner. We used high 10% CO2 to achieve maximal vasodilation, and we monitored the ETCO2 level aiming for an increase in ETCO2 between a 7- and 8-mm Hg change. This was performed by 2 experienced and medically qualified practitioners (S.D.G., S.K.) who were familiar with the experiment setup. During the 9-minute long paradigm, all of the subjects underwent 2 periods of hypercapnia and 3 periods of normocapnia. We also continuously monitored the subjects’ blood pressure, pulse, and arterial oxygen saturations continuously by using a MR compatible device (In vivo; Siemens, Malvern, Pa).

Data Analysis

We analyzed all data using FSL software (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/), FMRI Expert Analysis Tool (FEAT) deploying standard preprocessing with high-pass filtering, and smoothing and motion correction using MCFLIRT.21 During the FSL analysis, the ETCO2 data acquired during the scanning session are incorporated into the design matrix of the general linear model by the 2 methods described below. A Gaussian model was used for modeling the hemodynamic response function. A limitation of our CO2 setup included a sampling delay in ETCO2 from patient to capnometer outside the scanner room. There was also a second time lag of BOLD signal intensity change after increase in ETCO2 level. The FSL analysis method compensated for these time lags by allowing for a temporal derivative of the design matrix waveform. This essentially shifts the waveform slightly in time during the analysis to enable a better fit of the data and model.

Visually Defined Boxcar Analysis

We created individual hypercapnia activation maps using FEAT by visually assigning each volunteer's ETCO2 time series data in a boxcar format (ie, defining on-and-off periods according to the ETCO2 changes). On-periods were defined as peak or plateau of ETCO2 levels after a greater than 5-mm Hg change from each volunteer's baseline ETCO2 level (Fig 1). The boxcar data were then incorporated into the general linear model and used for analysis.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Example of boxcar analysis method showing BOLD signal intensity timecourse and corresponding ETCO2 model.

Automated Regression Model with Use of ETCO2 Data

The second method was fully automated, whereby the hypercapnia-induced activation maps were derived from direct regression of the BOLD signal intensity to the entire ETCO2 time series as input regressor (Fig 2). By using the actual ETCO2 data, we exploited the full dynamic range of CO2 variations.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Example of automated analysis method showing BOLD signal intensity timecourse and corresponding ETCO2 time course.

Absolute and ETCO2 Normalized BOLD Amplitudes

Activation maps with use of both methods of analysis were thresholded at the uncorrected P < .05 level, therefore allowing for all significantly activated voxels to be represented on the CVR maps. Mean percent signal intensity changes (PSC) were derived for the following tissue compartments: whole brain (ie, supratentorial brain), gray matter, white matter, and gray matter MCA territory. Linear normalization to the ETCO2 change averaged during the experiment was performed as in previous studies5,7,22,23 for the datasets resulting in PSC/mm Hg ETCO2 change.

Tissue Segmentation and Region-of-Interest Definition

After this, we segmented the fMRI images into gray and white matter using FMRIB Automated Segmentation Tool (FAST) from FSL.24 A manually drawn MCA template territory was also created in standard space. This was then joined with each volunteer's gray matter template to make individualized gray matter MCA territory masks. Absolute mean PSC were derived from these tissue compartments with FSL software FEAT query after conversion from standard space into functional space.

Asymmetry Index

The degree of hemispheric asymmetry (hemispheric asymmetry index [hAI]) was determined according to hAI = 200 X (PSC dominant [handedness] hemisphere − PSC nondominant hemisphere)/(PSC sum both hemispheres) as in studies by Baciu et al,25 de Boorder et al,26 and Kaminogo et al.27 The 95% confidence intervals were also given for hAI.

Statistical Analysis

We performed statistical calculations using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 15.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Ill) software. We then compared data using the Student t test and the Mann-Whitney U test for parametric and nonparametric variables, respectively. Correlations were performed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Intersubject and intrasubject variability were expressed as coefficients of variation. Statistical significance was set as P < .05. Data are expressed as mean percentage signal intensity change ± SD. The statistical software STATA (StataCorp, College Station, Tex) was used for linear regression analysis and to assess data for nonlinearities by use of a quadratic term. Regression involved use of a random intercept model to allow for multiple observations.

Results

General Findings

All 16 subjects tolerated the experiment well without adverse reactions during the course of study to inhalation of CO2. The observed motion as estimated by FSL was within acceptable limits in all cases (ie, < 3 mm in x-, y-, and z-axis). There were no significant alterations in blood pressure, pulse, and oxygen saturations after CO2 stimulation. The mean baseline ETCO2 level was 35.4 ± 5 mm Hg. The mean peak ETCO2 level was 43.3 ± 5.6 mm Hg. The mean change in ETCO2 was 7.8 ± 3.3 mm Hg. The intersubject coefficient of variation (COV) of ETCO2 change was 41%, and intrasubject reproducibility was 29%.

All subjects showed strong and qualitatively symmetric BOLD signal intensity increases during hypercapnia. Significant responses were not limited to brain parenchyma with high z-scores in both gray matter and the subarachnoid spaces and lower z-values in white matter voxels with a clearly visible interface between gray and white matter (Fig 3). As expected, absolute PSC were higher for gray matter than with white matter (Table 1).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A CO2 reactivity map of a healthy volunteer showing symmetric hemispheric signal intensity change after stimulation with CO2. This is a contrast map denoting magnitude of signal intensity change.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Summary data of normalized and nonnormalized mean PSC and SD for both analysis methods

Absolute PSC and ETCO2 Levels

We found a significant linear correlation between PSC and ETCO2 levels for both methods of BOLD amplitude estimation (R2 = 0.244 (P = .0001) for the boxcar method and R2 = 0.18 (P = .003) for the automated method (see Fig 4 for boxcar method). To further explore the possibility of a nonlinear relationship between PSC and ETCO2 change, we tested the data using a quadratic term and found no significant relationship.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Scatterplot showing the relationship between change in ETCO2 and nonnormalized BOLD PSC for the boxcar method.

Reliability of Boxcar vs Automated Determination of Absolute PSC

There was a small but significant bias toward higher absolute PSC when using the boxcar compared with the regression model that failed to reach significance for whole-brain gray matter (Table 1). A good test-retest short-term reproducibility was found for absolute PSC for both the boxcar and regression analysis methods (range, 4.8% to 10% COV; Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Test retest reliability given as COV for nonnormalized and normalized data for both analysis methods*

Intrasession, interhemispheric reproducibility of absolute PSC was excellent (range, 1.2% to 2.2% COV) depending on tissue and analysis method. Correlation between hemispheric absolute PSC was very high for both analysis methods (0.963–0.993; P = .0001). Mean hemispheric asymmetry indices were low for all regions of interest (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Hemispheric asymmetry index values given for boxcar and automated analysis methods*

Effect of ETCO2 Normalization

Linear correction for ETCO2 unexpectedly led to substantial degradation of reliability. Short-term reproducibility of normalized data yielded an unacceptably high COV of more than 23% (Table 2). Deterioration was significant for all the regions/tissue types except for whole-brain and gray matter data analyzed with the automated method that still showed a similar trend.

Between-Subject Variation

Intersubject variability.

Similar to intrasubject reproducibility, the between-subject variation was lower for the nonnormalized compared with CO2 normalized data (Table 4). Of note, the automated regression analysis method revealed lower COV, suggesting improved correction for between-subject variability of physiologic factors with lowest values for the MCA territory (14.2%) and white matter (11.3%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4:

Intersubject nonnormalized and normalized COV given for both analysis methods

Discussion

Our study investigated both the short-term reproducibility and intersubject variability of hypercapnia BOLD fMRI in a group of young healthy volunteers and compared various quantification methods. The main findings are that absolute BOLD signal intensity changes after 10% hypercapnia challenge 1) yield good short-term reproducibility (≤10%), 2) reveal very good interhemispheric reproducibility (< 4%), and 3) show better reproducibility and lower between-subject variability than BOLD ratios normalized to ETCO2.

BOLD fMRI techniques are becoming increasingly used in clinical studies. To be used as a diagnostic clinical test, the technique needs to be reliable (ie, precise and accurate). Accuracy of CVR assessments with hypercapnia fMRI has been assessed against SPECT,28 with favorable results. The reported BOLD signal intensity changes of 2.54% to 2.93% are also reasonably well in line with previously reported results with use of the same field strength and similar pulse sequence details (gradient echo-planar imaging with TR of 3800 ms and TE of 40 ms).12 Our reported absolute BOLD signal intensity changes in white matter were higher than other reported values; this finding is likely because of different gray and white matter segmentation techniques used. However, our normalized values are very similar to other published data.

Few formal short-term reproducibility studies of CVR assessment are available to date. MR imaging assessment with acetazolamide was reported to have a limited reproducibility of 26% to 28% for intersession COV.29 Leontiev and Buxton30 assessed the reproducibility of visual stimulation and mild hypercapnia by using ASL and BOLD at 3T. Of note, unacceptably poor reproducibility was seen for ASL, even at 3T. Furthermore, two-threefold larger intrasubject and intersubject variability were reported for absolute BOLD signal intensity changes (intrasubject COV, 21.4% to 35.0%; intersubject COV, 32.7% to 50.3%), but similar COVs were noted for normalized BOLD (intrasubject COV, 23.3% to 28.6%; intersubject COV, 30.6% to 33.0%). The differences can be explained by technical differences with smaller hypercapnia challenge, much smaller region-of-interest analysis, and longer between-scan interval in their study akin to increased variation. The improvement seen in our study for absolute BOLD changes underlines the advantage of a submaximal 10% CO2 stimulation compared with mild hypercapnic stimulus of 5% CO2, which may have led to greater variability in the ETCO2 change and BOLD signal intensity change. With use of higher CO2 stimulus, larger ETCO2 changes are achieved causing near maximal vasodilation. The resulting BOLD signal intensity change can then be expected to be near maximum as well and, hence, more stable across imaging sessions as evidenced by our lower COV.

Our interhemispheric data analysis revealed very low COV and very strong interhemispheric correlation for the absolute BOLD signal intensity change. Also by using an amplitude-based assessment of hemispheric asymmetry, we found excellent symmetry for hypercapnia fMRI, with mean hAI ranging between −1.92 and 0.84. This method of data analysis provides a highly comparable measure by intrinsic correction for a number of potential sources of variations, such as physiologic baseline variations in CO2 level and cerebral blood flow, variation in respiratory effort, and ETCO2 and scanner performance. The hAI has been used previously in clinical studies of patients with carotid artery disease with SPECT.26,27 So far, hAI has not been reported for hypercapnia fMRI. We consider the assessment of the hemispheric symmetry of the BOLD response particularly relevant for future clinical studies examining patients with unilateral diseases such as carotid artery disease. Inasmuch as confidence intervals (3% to 8%) from our young healthy volunteers can be translated to patients, hypercapnia fMRI promises sensitive detection of stroke risk and CVR in those with hemodynamically significant steno-occlusive diseases. Additional studies in older volunteers and patients are warranted to ascertain the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of this test.

An important factor to consider for quantitative reproducible hypercapnia fMRI relates to variations in ETCO2 levels. In our data, a significant linear relationship was found between absolute PSC and ETCO2 levels, explaining 24% and 18% of the mutual variance according to the boxcar and regression analyses. There was no indication of a nonlinear interaction, but the linear dependence resulted mainly from the lower end of ETCO2 change (Fig 4). Because of the experimental setup chosen in view of safe clinical applicability, we had limited data at higher ETCO2 changes; hence, we are unable to exclude a nonlinear relationship.

Normalization of PSC to ETCO2 change substantially degraded the reliability of hypercapnia fMRI with significant worsening of short-term reproducibility and increase in intersubject variability. This was surprising against the clear linear interrelation observed and the proposed linear normalization method to present the data corrected for the ETCO2 change in % signal intensity change/mm Hg change format. The disadvantage of normalization with use of ratios to mm Hg and ETCO2 change can be explained by its oversimplification of the true interrelation that is not unity and moreover is expected to depend on the absolute baseline value with nonlinear behavior at maximal vasodilation. For strong hypercapnic challenges, BOLD normalizations to mm Hg CO2 change cannot be recommended. Of note, this rationale was also applied in a previous large patient study using TCD for assessment of CVR in which no normalization to ETCO2 was performed.31

The main limitation of our study was the inclusion of only young healthy volunteers and a limited number of subjects. However, the study size was sufficient to demonstrate that 10% hypercapnia provides a robust BOLD signal intensity increase, allowing reliable and reproducible CVR assessment. It remains to be shown whether similar short-term reproducibility can be achieved in older subjects and patients. However, the setup was chosen for its tolerability, and we expect no difficulties for older subjects and patients.

The second limitation was the dependence of absolute BOLD PSC on the end-expiratory CO2 change. Nevertheless, we demonstrated that the standard proposed normalization was inadequate and impaired reproducibility. Until the full nature of this relationship is clarified, control of potential confounding effects from ETCO2 via regression analysis is required for systematic evaluation of CVR between subjects and effects from interventions. From a practical aspect for clinical application, additional standardization of ETCO2 may further mitigate the problem. Dynamic end-tidal forcing, described by Wise et al20, independently sets ETCO2 to desired levels by rapid alteration of inspired gases on a breath-by-breath basis via computer feedback. This method targets the desired ETCO2 change and may further improve reproducibility for individual CVR mapping.

Conclusions

In conclusion, assessing cerebrovascular reactivity with use of hypercapnia fMRI and absolute BOLD amplitude estimation was found to be safe and reproducible in healthy volunteers. Analysis of absolute BOLD signal intensity change yielded good short-term and very good interhemispheric stability. Larger normative data in older healthy subjects and patient studies are warranted to probe the clinical usefulness of CVR assessment by quantitative hypercapnia fMRI.

References

  1. ↵
    Chang CC, Kuwana N, Ito S, et al. Effects of peritumoural oedema on cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with alert consciousness. Eur J Nucl Med 1999;26:1493–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. de Castro AG, Bajbouj M, Schlattmann P, et al. Cerebrovascular reactivity in depressed patients without vascular risk factors. J Psychiatr Res 2008;42:78–82
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Krainik A, Hund-Georgiadis, M, Zysset S, et al. Regional impairment of cerebrovascular reactivity and BOLD signal in adults after stroke. Stroke 2005;36:1146–52
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Vicenzini E, Ricciardi MC, Altieri M, et al. Cerebrovascular reactivity in degenerative and vascular dementia: a transcranial Doppler study. Eur Neurol 2007;58:84–89
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    van der Zande FH, Hofman PA, Backes WH. Mapping hypercapnia-induced cerebrovascular reactivity using BOLD MRI. Neuroradiology 2005;47:114–20
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. Vazquez AL, Cohen ER, Gulani V, et al. Vascular dynamics and BOLD fMRI: CBF level effects and analysis considerations. Neuroimage 2006;32:1642–55
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Ziyeh S, Rick J, Reinhard M, et al. Blood oxygen level-dependent MRI of cerebral CO2 reactivity in severe carotid stenosis and occlusion. Stroke 2005;36:751–56
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Minhas PS, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick PJ, et al., Pressure autoregulation and positron emission tomography-derived cerebral blood flow acetazolamide reactivity in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Neurosurgery 2004;55:63–67; discussion 67–68
    PubMed
  9. Ogasawara K, Ito H, Sasoh M, et al. Quantitative measurement of regional cerebrovascular reactivity to acetazolamide using 123I-N-isopropyl-p-iodoamphetamine autoradiography with SPECT: validation study using H2 15O with PET. J Nucl Med 2003;44:520–25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Uematsu T, et al. Correlation of angiographic circulation time and cerebrovascular reserve by acetazolamide-challenged single photon emission CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:242–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Kastrup A, Dichgans J, Niemeier M, et al. Changes of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity during normal aging. Stroke 1998;29:1311–14
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Kastrup A, Kruger G, Neumann-Haefelin T, et al. Assessment of cerebrovascular reactivity with functional magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of CO(2) and breath holding. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;19:13–20
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Vesely A, Sasano H, Volgyesi G, et al. MRI mapping of cerebrovascular reactivity using square wave changes in end-tidal PCO2. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:1011–13
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Mandell DM, Han JS, Poublanc J, et al. Mapping cerebrovascular reactivity using blood oxygen level-dependent MRI in patients with arterial steno-occlusive disease: comparison with arterial spin labeling MRI. Stroke 2008;39:2021–28
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Haller S, Wetzel SG, Radue EW, et al. Mapping continuous neuronal activation without an ON-OFF paradigm: initial results of BOLD ceiling fMRI. Eur J Neurosci 2006;24:2672–78
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Sicard KM, Duong TQ. Effects of hypoxia, hyperoxia, and hypercapnia on baseline and stimulus-evoked BOLD, CBF, and CMRO2 in spontaneously breathing animals. Neuroimage 2005;25:850–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Piechnik SK, Chiarelli PA, Jezzard P. Modelling vascular reactivity to investigate the basis of the relationship between cerebral blood volume and flow under CO2 manipulation. Neuroimage 2008;39:107–18
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. Posse S, Kemna LJ, Elghahwagi B, et al. Effect of graded hypo- and hypercapnia on fMRI contrast in visual cortex: quantification of T(*)(2) changes by multiecho EPI. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:264–71
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Rostrup E, Knudsen GM, Law I, et al. The relationship between cerebral blood flow and volume in humans. Neuroimage 2005;24:1–11
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Wise RG, Pattinson KT, Bulte DP, et al. Dynamic forcing of end-tidal carbon dioxide and oxygen applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007;27:1521–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, et al. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    AbuRahma AF, Kyer PD 3rd, Robinson PA, et al. The correlation of ultrasonic carotid plaque morphology and carotid plaque hemorrhage: clinical implications. Surgery 1998;124:721–26; discussion 726–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Lythgoe DJ, Williams SC, Cullinane M, et al. Mapping of cerebrovascular reactivity using BOLD magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1999;17:495–502
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45–57
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Baciu M, Juphard A, Cousin E, et al. Evaluating fMRI methods for assessing hemispheric language dominance in healthy subjects. Eur J Radiol 2005;55:209–18
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    de Boorder MJ, van der Grond J, van Dongen AJ, et al. SPECT measurements of regional cerebral perfusion and carbon dioxide reactivity: correlation with cerebral collaterals in internal carotid artery occlusive disease. J Neurol 2006;253:1285–91
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Kaminogo M, Ochi M, Onizuka M, et al. An additional monitoring of regional cerebral oxygen saturation to HMPAO SPECT study during balloon test occlusion. Stroke 1999;30:407–13
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Shiino A, Morita Y, Tsuji A, et al. Estimation of cerebral perfusion reserve by blood oxygenation level-dependent imaging: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003;23:121–35
    PubMed
  29. ↵
    Spilt A, van den Boom R, Kamper AM, et al. MR assessment of cerebral vascular response: a comparison of two methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:610–16
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Leontiev O, Buxton RB. Reproducibility of BOLD, perfusion, and CMRO2 measurements with calibrated-BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 2007;35:175–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Markus H, Cullinane M. Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis and occlusion. Brain 2001;124:457–67
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received October 21, 2008.
  • Accepted after revision December 11, 2008.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 5
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Precision of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Use of Different Quantification Methods for Hypercapnia Functional MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S.D. Goode, S. Krishan, C. Alexakis, R. Mahajan, D.P. Auer
Precision of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Use of Different Quantification Methods for Hypercapnia Functional MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 972-977; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1496

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Precision of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Assessment with Use of Different Quantification Methods for Hypercapnia Functional MR Imaging
S.D. Goode, S. Krishan, C. Alexakis, R. Mahajan, D.P. Auer
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 972-977; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1496
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Variable Cerebral Blood Flow Responsiveness to Acute Hypoxic Hypoxia
  • Effects of short-term continuous positive airway pressure withdrawal on cerebral vascular reactivity measured by blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging in obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled trial
  • Cerebral misery perfusion due to carotid occlusive disease
  • Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity Predicts Recurrent Symptoms in Patients with Carotid Artery Occlusion: A Hypercapnia BOLD fMRI Study
  • Quantitative Measurement of Cerebrovascular Reactivity by Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MR Imaging in Patients with Intracranial Stenosis: Preoperative Cerebrovascular Reactivity Predicts the Effect of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery
  • Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity With Steal Phenomenon Is Associated With Increased Diffusion in White Matter of Patients With Moyamoya Disease
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Multiparametric MRI in PEDS Pontine Glioma
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire