Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

OtherPHYSICS REVIEW

Theoretic Basis and Technical Implementations of CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 2: Technical Implementations

A.A. Konstas, G.V. Goldmakher, T.-Y. Lee and M.H. Lev
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 885-892; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1492
A.A. Konstas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.V. Goldmakher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.-Y. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.H. Lev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Konstas AA, Goldmakher GV, Lee T-Y, et al. Theoretic basis and technical implementations of CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke, Part 1. Theoretic basis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:662–68
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Wintermark M, Albers GW, Alexandrov AV, et al. Acute stroke imaging research roadmap. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:e23–30
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Wintermark M, Albers GW, Alexandrov AV, et al. Acute stroke imaging research roadmap. Stroke 2008;39:1621–28
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Shetty SK, Lev MH. CT perfusion in acute stroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15:481–501
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    White H, Boden-Albala B, Wang C, et al. Ischemic stroke subtype incidence among whites, blacks, and Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Circulation 2005;111:1327–31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Shapiro MD, Neilan TG, Jassal DS, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for the detection of left atrial appendage thrombus: a comparative study with transesophageal echocardiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:905–09
    PubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Kim YY, Klein AL, Halliburton SS, et al. Left atrial appendage filling defects identified by multidetector computed tomography in patients undergoing radiofrequency pulmonary vein antral isolation: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J 2007;154:1199–205
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Cenic A, Nabavi DG, Craen RA, et al. Dynamic CT measurement of cerebral blood flow: a validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:63–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Nabavi DG, Cenic A, Craen RA, et al. CT assessment of cerebral perfusion: experimental validation and initial clinical experience. Radiology 1999;213:141–49
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Miles KA. Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol? Br J Radiol 2003;76 (Spec No 1):S36–42
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Lorberboym M, Lampl Y, Sadeh M. Correlation of 99mTc-DTPA SPECT of the blood-brain barrier with neurologic outcome after acute stroke. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1898–904
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Kassner A, Roberts T, Taylor K, et al. Prediction of hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke using permeability MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2213–17
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Lee TY. Scientific basis and validation. In: Miles KA, Eastwood JD, Konig M., eds. Multidetector Computed Tomography in Cerebrovascular Disease: CT Perfusion Imaging. Abingdon, UK: Informa Healthcare;2007 :13–27
  14. ↵
    Lee TY, Stewart E. Scientific basis and validation. In: Miles KA, Charnsangavej C, Cuenod CA, eds. Multidetector Computed Tomography in Oncology: CT Perfusion Imaging. Abingdon, UK: Informa Healthcare;2007
  15. ↵
    Nabavi DG, Cenic A, Dool J, et al. Quantitative assessment of cerebral hemodynamics using CT: stability, accuracy, and precision studies in dogs. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:506–15
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Wintermark M, Maeder P, Verdun FR, et al. Using 80 kVp versus 120 kVp in perfusion CT measurement of regional cerebral blood flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1881–84
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Smith WS, et al. Multisection dynamic CT perfusion for acute cerebral ischemia: the “toggling-table” technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1077–80
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Wintermark M, Reichhart M, Thiran JP, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2002;51:417–32
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Wintermark M, Smith WS, Ko NU, et al. Dynamic perfusion CT: optimizing the temporal resolution and contrast volume for calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:720–29
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Smith AB, Dillon WP, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1628–32
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, et al. Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 2003;226:762–72
    PubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Lee TYM B, Chen X, Miles KA. Image processing. In: Miles KA, Eastwood JD, Konig, M, eds. Multidetector Computed Tomography in Cerebrovascular Disease: CT Perfusion Imaging. Abingdon, UK: Informa Healthcare;2007 :57–69
  23. ↵
    Sanelli PC, Lev MH, Eastwood JD, et al. The effect of varying user-selected input parameters on quantitative values in CT perfusion maps. Acad Radiol 2004;11:1085–92
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Kudo K, Terae S, Katoh C, et al. Quantitative cerebral blood flow measurement with dynamic perfusion CT using the vascular-pixel elimination method: comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:419–26
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466–73
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. Calamante F, Yim PJ, Cebral JR. Estimation of bolus dispersion effects in perfusion MRI using image-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroimage 2003;19:341–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Wu O, Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, et al. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164–74
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Wittsack HJ, Wohlschlager AM, Ritzl EK, et al. CT-perfusion imaging of the human brain: advanced deconvolution analysis using circulant singular value decomposition. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2008;32:67–77
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    van Osch MJ, Vonken EJ, Bakker CJ, et al. Correcting partial volume artifacts of the arterial input function in quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:477–85
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Lin W, Celik A, Derdeyn C, et al. Quantitative measurements of cerebral blood flow in patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion: a PET and MR study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:659–67
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Lorenz C, Benner T, Chen PJ, et al. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1133–39
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Mouridsen K, Christensen S, Gyldensted L, et al. Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:524–31
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Calamante F, Morup M, Hansen LK. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:789–97
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Ibaraki M, Shimosegawa E, Toyoshima H, et al. Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25:378–90
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Mui K, Nogueira R, Lev MH, et al. CT CBV lesions do not always infarct in acute stroke following IA and IV thrombolysis: In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, New Orleans, La, June 2,2008
  36. ↵
    Bisdas S, Konstantinou GN, Gurung J, et al. Effect of the arterial input function on the measured perfusion values and infarct volumetric in acute cerebral ischemia evaluated by perfusion computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42:147–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Thijs VN, Adami A, Neumann-Haefelin T, et al. Relationship between severity of MR perfusion deficit and DWI lesion evolution. Neurology 2001;57:1205–11
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Rose SE, Janke AL, Griffin M, et al. Improving the prediction of final infarct size in acute stroke with bolus delay-corrected perfusion MRI measures. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:941–47
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Goldmakher GV, Kamalian S, Schaefer PW, et al. Fully automated processing of stroke CT perfusion maps is fast and accurate. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: November 29,2006
  40. ↵
    Fiorella D, Heiserman J, Prenger E, et AL. Assessment of the reproducibility of postprocessing dynamic CT perfusion data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:97–107
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Warach S. Measurement of the ischemic penumbra with MRI: it's about time. Stroke 2003;34:2533–34
    FREE Full Text
  42. Wu O, Koroshetz WJ, Ostergaard L, et al. Predicting tissue outcome in acute human cerebral ischemia using combined diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging. Stroke 2001;32:933–42
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Barber PA, Darby DG, Desmond PM, et al. Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI. Neurology 1998;51:418–26
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Koenig M, Kraus M, Theek C, et al. Quantitative assessment of the ischemic brain by means of perfusion-related parameters derived from perfusion CT. Stroke 2001;32:431–37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Powers WJ, Grubb RL Jr, Raichle ME. Physiological responses to focal cerebral ischemia in humans. Ann Neurol 1984;16:546–52
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Schaefer PW, Roccatagliata L, Ledezma C, et al. First-pass quantitative CT perfusion identifies thresholds for salvageable penumbra in acute stroke patients treated with intra-arterial therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:20–25
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Wintermark M, Flanders AE, Velthuis B, et al. Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006;37:979–85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Hossmann KA. Viability thresholds and the penumbra of focal ischemia. Ann Neurol 1994;36:557–65
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. Harper AM. Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow: influence of the arterial blood pressure on the blood flow through the cerebral cortex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1966;29:398–403
    FREE Full Text
  50. Lee KH, Cho SJ, Byun HS, et al. Triphasic perfusion computed tomography in acute middle cerebral artery stroke: a correlation with angiographic findings. Arch Neurol 2000;57:990–99
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    Mayer TE, Hamann GF, Baranczyk J, et al. Dynamic CT perfusion imaging of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1441–49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Murphy BD, Fox AJ, Lee DH, et al. Identification of penumbra and infarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke 2006;37:1771–77
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Murphy BD, Fox AJ, Lee DH, et al. White matter thresholds for the ischemic penumbra and infarct core in patients with acute stroke: CT perfusion study. Radiology 2008;247:818–25. Epub 2008 Apr 18
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    Eastwood JD, Lev MH, Azhari T, et al. CT perfusion scanning with deconvolution analysis: pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Radiology 2002;222:227–36
    PubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    Sorensen A, Copen W, Ostergaard L, et al. Hyperacute stroke: simultaneous measurement of relative cerebral blood volume, relative cerebral blood flow and mean tissue transit time. Radiology 1999;210:519–27
    PubMedWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    Beaulieu C, de Crespigny A, Tong DC, et al. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of perfusion and diffusion in stroke: evolution of lesion volume and correlation with clinical outcome. Ann Neurol 1999;46:568–78
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    Derex L, Nighoghossian N, Hermier M, et al. Influence of pretreatment MRI parameters on clinical outcome, recanalization and infarct size in 49 stroke patients treated by intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. J Neurol Sci 2004;225:3–9
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    Rohl L, Geday J, Ostergaard L, et al. Correlation between diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI and neurological deficit measured by the Scandinavian Stroke Scale and Barthel Index in hyperacute subcortical stroke (≤6 hours). Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;12:203–13
    CrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Parsons MW, Barber PA, Chalk J, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI response to thrombolysis in stroke. Ann Neurol 2002;51:28–37
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    Barber PA, Parsons MW, Desmond PM, et al. The use of PWI and DWI measures in the design of “proof-of-concept” stroke trials. J Neuroimaging 2004;14:123–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Butcher K, Parsons M, Baird T, et al. Perfusion thresholds in acute stroke thrombolysis. Stroke 2003;34:2159–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    Kane I, Carpenter T, Chappell F, et al. Comparison of 10 different magnetic resonance perfusion imaging processing methods in acute ischemic stroke: effect on lesion size, proportion of patients with diffusion/perfusion mismatch, clinical scores, and radiologic outcomes. Stroke 2007;38:3158–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, et al. The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 2005;36:66–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  64. Albers GW. Expanding the window for thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke: the potential role of acute MRI for patient selection. Stroke 1999;30:2230–37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  65. Muir KW, Grosset DG. Neuroprotection for acute stroke: making clinical trials work. Stroke 1999;30:180–82
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    Furlan AJ, Eyding D, Albers GW, et al. Dose Escalation of Desmoteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke (DEDAS): evidence of safety and efficacy 3 to 9 hours after stroke onset. Stroke 2006;37:1227–31
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 5
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Theoretic Basis and Technical Implementations of CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 2: Technical Implementations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.A. Konstas, G.V. Goldmakher, T.-Y. Lee, M.H. Lev
Theoretic Basis and Technical Implementations of CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 2: Technical Implementations
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 885-892; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1492

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Theoretic Basis and Technical Implementations of CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 2: Technical Implementations
A.A. Konstas, G.V. Goldmakher, T.-Y. Lee, M.H. Lev
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2009, 30 (5) 885-892; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1492
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Technical Implementations
    • Clinical Implications
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • CTP for the Screening of Vasospasm and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Aneurysmal SAH: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
  • Transcranial cortex-wide imaging of murine ischemic perfusion with large-field multifocal illumination fluorescence microscopy
  • Deep Learning for Perfusion Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Volume (CBV) Predictions and Diagnostics
  • Acute stroke imaging selection for mechanical thrombectomy in the extended time window: is it time to go back to basics? A review of current evidence
  • Dynamic CTA-Derived Perfusion Maps Predict Final Infarct Volume: The Simple Perfusion Reconstruction Algorithm
  • Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke: Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use
  • Defining Ischemic Core in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using CT Perfusion: A Multiparametric Bayesian-Based Model
  • Correction for Delay and Dispersion Results in More Accurate Cerebral Blood Flow Ischemic Core Measurement in Acute Stroke
  • CT perfusion and angiographic assessment of pial collateral reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke: the CAPRI study
  • C-Arm Flat Detector CT Parenchymal Blood Volume Thresholds for Identification of Infarcted Parenchyma in the Neurointerventional Suite
  • Pretreatment Advanced Imaging in Patients with Stroke Treated with IV Thrombolysis: Evaluation of a Multihospital Data Base
  • Current State of Acute Stroke Imaging
  • C-Arm CT Measurement of Cerebral Blood Volume and Cerebral Blood Flow Using a Novel High-Speed Acquisition and a Single Intravenous Contrast Injection
  • CT Brain Perfusion Protocol to Eliminate the Need for Selecting a Venous Output Function
  • Differences in CT Perfusion Summary Maps for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Generated by 2 Software Packages
  • Cerebral Blood Flow Is the Optimal CT Perfusion Parameter for Assessing Infarct Core
  • Using Quantitative CT Perfusion for Evaluation of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
  • Temporal Resolution of Dynamic Angiography Using Flat Panel Volume CT: In Vivo Evaluation of Time-Dependent Vascular Pathologies
  • Regional Ischemic Vulnerability of the Brain to Hypoperfusion: The Need for Location Specific Computed Tomography Perfusion Thresholds in Acute Stroke Patients
  • CT Angiographic Source Images: Flow- or Volume-Weighted?
  • The Future of Stroke Imaging: What We Need and How to Get to It
  • FDA Investigates the Safety of Brain Perfusion CT
  • Crossref (177)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Cerebral Blood Flow Is the Optimal CT Perfusion Parameter for Assessing Infarct Core
    Bruce C.V. Campbell, Søren Christensen, Christopher R. Levi, Patricia M. Desmond, Geoffrey A. Donnan, Stephen M. Davis, Mark W. Parsons
    Stroke 2011 42 12
  • Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective
    Lifeng Yu, Xin Liu, Shuai Leng, James M Kofler, Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo, Mingliang Qu, Jodie Christner, Joel G Fletcher, Cynthia H McCollough
    Imaging in Medicine 2009 1 1
  • Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke
    Achala Vagal, Max Wintermark, Kambiz Nael, Andrew Bivard, Mark Parsons, Aaron W. Grossman, Pooja Khatri
    Neurology 2019 93 20
  • Deconvolution-Based CT and MR Brain Perfusion Measurement: Theoretical Model Revisited and Practical Implementation Details
    Andreas Fieselmann, Markus Kowarschik, Arundhuti Ganguly, Joachim Hornegger, Rebecca Fahrig
    International Journal of Biomedical Imaging 2011 2011
  • Whole-Brain CT Perfusion to Quantify Acute Ischemic Penumbra and Core
    Longting Lin, Andrew Bivard, Venkatesh Krishnamurthy, Christopher R. Levi, Mark W. Parsons
    Radiology 2016 279 3
  • Regional Ischemic Vulnerability of the Brain to Hypoperfusion
    Seyedmehdi Payabvash, Leticia C.S. Souza, Yifei Wang, Pamela W. Schaefer, Karen L. Furie, Elkan F. Halpern, R. Gilberto Gonzalez, Michael H. Lev
    Stroke 2011 42 5
  • Imaging and diagnostic advances for intracranial meningiomas
    Raymond Y Huang, Wenya Linda Bi, Brent Griffith, Timothy J Kaufmann, Christian la Fougère, Nils Ole Schmidt, Jöerg C Tonn, Michael A Vogelbaum, Patrick Y Wen, Kenneth Aldape, Farshad Nassiri, Gelareh Zadeh, Ian F Dunn, Kenneth Aldape, Karolyn Au, Jill Barnhartz-Sloan, Wenya Linda Bi, Priscilla K Brastianos, Nicholas Butowski, Carlos Carlotti, Michael D Cusimano, Francesco DiMeco, Katharine Drummond, Ian F Dunn, Evanthia Galanis, Caterina Giannini, Roland Goldbrunner, Brent Griffith, Rintaro Hashizume, C Oliver Hanemann, Christel Herold-Mende, Craig Horbinski, Raymond Y Huang, David James, Michael D Jenkinson, Christine Jungk, Timothy J Kaufman, Boris Krischek, Daniel Lachance, Christian Lafougère, Ian Lee, Jeff C Liu, Yasin Mamatjan, Alireza Mansouri, Christian Mawrin, Michael McDermott, David Munoz, Farshad Nassiri, Houtan Noushmehr, Ho-Keung Ng, Arie Perry, Farhad Pirouzmand, Laila M Poisson, Bianca Pollo, David Raleigh, Felix Sahm, Andrea Saladino, Thomas Santarius, Christian Schichor, David Schultz, Nils O Schmidt, Warren Selman, Andrew Sloan, Julian Spears, James Snyder, Suganth Suppiah, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Marcos Tatagiba, Daniela Tirapelli, Joerg C Tonn, Derek Tsang, Michael A Vogelbaum, Andreas von Deimling, Patrick Y Wen, Tobias Walbert, Manfred Westphal, Adriana M Workewych, Gelareh Zadeh
    Neuro-Oncology 2019 21 Supplement_1
  • FDA Investigates the Safety of Brain Perfusion CT
    M. Wintermark, M.H. Lev
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2010 31 1
  • Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Let Us Improve the Science before Changing Clinical Practice
    Mayank Goyal, Bijoy K. Menon, Colin P. Derdeyn
    Radiology 2013 266 1
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Cerebrovascular Disease
    Michael B. Salmela, Shabnam Mortazavi, Bharathi D. Jagadeesan, Daniel F. Broderick, Judah Burns, Tejaswini K. Deshmukh, H. Benjamin Harvey, Jenny Hoang, Christopher H. Hunt, Tabassum A. Kennedy, Alexander A. Khalessi, William Mack, Nandini D. Patel, Joel S. Perlmutter, Bruno Policeni, Jason W. Schroeder, Gavin Setzen, Matthew T. Whitehead, Rebecca S. Cornelius, Amanda S. Corey
    Journal of the American College of Radiology 2017 14 5

More in this TOC Section

  • Theoretic Basis and Technical Implementations of CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 1: Theoretic Basis
  • Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 2
Show more PHYSICS REVIEW

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire