Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

L.S. Babiarz; J.M. Romero; E.K. Murphy; B. Brobeck; P.W. Schaefer; R.G. González; M.H. Lev

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1464

Research ArticleHead and Neck Imaging

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González and M.H. Lev

American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1464

L.S. Babiarz

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

J.M. Romero

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

E.K. Murphy

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

B. Brobeck

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

P.W. Schaefer

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

R.G. González

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

M.H. Lev

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
Responses
References
PDF

Submit a Response to This Article

Compose eLetter

Title *

Contents

More information about text formats

Plain text

No HTML tags allowed.
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. [email protected] Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

Please describe the competing interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

PreviousNext

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Vol. 30, Issue 4

April 2009

Table of Contents
Index by author

Download PDF

Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Your Email *

Your Name *

Send To *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

Message Subject (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology

Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.

Your Personal Message

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Cite this article

L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González, M.H. Lev

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1464

Citation Manager Formats

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

0 Responses

Respond to this article

Bookmark this article

User Name *

Password *

Remember my user name & password.

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González, M.H. Lev

American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1464

Share This Article:

Tweet Widget
Facebook Like
Google Plus One

Purchase

Jump to section

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
Responses
References
PDF

No related articles found.

PubMed
Google Scholar

Cited By...

Intraplaque High-Intensity Signal on 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography Is Strongly Associated with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
Carotid CTA: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality with the Use of Attenuation-Based, Automated Kilovolt Selection
Imaging challenges of carotid artery in-stent restenosis

Crossref (40)
Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Imaging of acute stroke

José G. Merino, Steven Warach

Nature Reviews Neurology 2010 6 10
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Outcome after Stroke: A Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence

Tracy D Farr, Susanne Wegener

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2010 30 4
Carotid CTA: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality with the Use of Attenuation-Based, Automated Kilovolt Selection

A. Eller, W. Wuest, M. Kramer, M. May, A. Schmid, M. Uder, M. M. Lell

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 2
Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction

Takayuki Yamamoto, Koji Fujimoto, Tomohisa Okada, Yasutaka Fushimi, Aurelien F. Stalder, Yutaka Natsuaki, Michaela Schmidt, Kaori Togashi

Investigative Radiology 2016 51 6
Intraplaque High-Intensity Signal on 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography Is Strongly Associated with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

A. Gupta, H. Baradaran, H. Kamel, A. Mangla, A. Pandya, V. Fodera, A. Dunning, P.C. Sanelli

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 3
Ischemic Stroke

Mara M. Kunst, Pamela W. Schaefer

Radiologic Clinics of North America 2011 49 1
MR Angiography at 3 Tesla to Assess Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Stenoses: Contrast-Enhanced or 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography?

J. Weber, P. Veith, B. Jung, G. Ihorst, O. Moske-Eick, S. Meckel, H. Urbach, C. A. Taschner

Clinical Neuroradiology 2015 25 1
Imaging challenges of carotid artery in-stent restenosis

Raffaella Pizzolato, Joshua A Hirsch, Javier M Romero

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2014 6 1
Automated quantification of carotid artery stenosis on contrast-enhanced MRA data using a deformable vascular tube model

Avan Suinesiaputra, Patrick J. H. de Koning, Elena Zudilova-Seinstra, Johan H. C. Reiber, Rob J. van der Geest

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2012 28 6
Computer‐assisted extraction of intracranial aneurysms on 3D rotational angiograms for computational fluid dynamics modeling

Herng‐Hua Chang, Gary R. Duckwiler, Daniel J. Valentino, Woei Chyn Chu

Medical Physics 2009 36 12

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

Plain text

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

Indexed Content

Cases

More from AJNR

Multimedia

Resources

About Us

American Society of Neuroradiology