Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

OtherSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Cervical CT-Guided, Selective Nerve Root Blocks: Improved Safety by Dorsal Approach

T. Wolter, M. Mohadjer, A. Berlis and S. Knoeller
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2009, 30 (2) 336-337; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1222
T. Wolter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Mohadjer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Berlis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Knoeller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Cervical transforaminal blocks are frequently performed as a treatment of cervical radicular pain. These blocks are performed mostly under fluoroscopy, but a CT-guided technique also has been described. We describe a modification that leads to a more extraforaminal than transforaminal and equally selective nerve root block.

Cervical selective nerve root blocks (CSNRB) are commonly performed with fluoroscopic guidance.1 However, CT-guidance is also possible and has been described. CT guidance offers the advantage of enhanced anatomic resolution and a more precise positioning of the needle tip.2 Disadvantages are extended procedure times and increased exposure to radiation. In both the fluoroscopic and the CT-guided CSNRB, the aim is to block the root within the foramen. Therefore, the patient is placed in the supine position, and the foramen is reached laterally in a nearly horizontal plane. We describe a modification of the CT guidance technique in which the patient is in the prone position and the foramen is reached dorsally, with the tip of the needle aiming at the outer confines of the foramen. This technique leads to an extraforaminal, but still selective, nerve root block. It may imply a smaller risk for devastating complications such as spinal cord infarction or cerebellar infarction.

Technique

We obtained informed consent before the intervention. The procedure, its benefits, and its risks were discussed with the patient. Among the risks are the possibilities of infection, bleeding, and allergic reaction as well as a small risk for severe neurologic impairment, such as spinal cord stroke, or even death. The procedure is only performed by or under the supervision of an experienced spine interventionalist.

For dorsal access, the patient is placed in the prone position. The head is rested in a straight position with the forehead on a pillow. After a lateral scout image, the target level is marked, and images are obtained through the desired cervical neural foramen. An appropriate needle entry point is calculated before it is identified and marked on the skin before its sterilization. The entry site should be chosen to avoid carotid and jugular vessels and to gain access to the outer foramen. Usually, the needle is placed in a 45 to 90° lateral angle to the table.

Once the site is disinfected and the skin and subcutaneous tissue are anesthetized, a 22-gauge, 10-cm straight spinal needle (Seibel–needle; William Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) is partially inserted, and an initial image is obtained. The needle bears markings to control the depth of introduction.

After the initial image is obtained, the needle is adjusted and advanced toward the posterior aspect of the neural foramen according to a preassigned trajectory in CT-guided technique. Usually 1 or 2 views, followed by another view after contrast application, are sufficient. The optimal placement of the needle tip is at the outer edge of the posterior foramen, which is reached in a 45–90° angle dorsally (Fig 1). The facet joint capsule can serve as a confine for the needle. Patients sometimes describe reproduction of their typical pain when the needle is in the right position.

  Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

CT scan of the contrast distribution after CSNRB of the right C5 nerve root.

In the last 4 years, the authors have performed more than 200 procedures in a dorsal approach, most of them with a diagnostic indication. When performed with therapeutic indication, we used 4 or 8 mg of dexamethasone. We have never encountered any major complications such as medullary infarction, cerebellar infarction, or permanent neurologic deficit.

Discussion

CSNRB is a technique frequently used in cases of cervical radicular pain, with estimates ranging in the magnitude of more 30,000 per year in the United States.3 It can be used as a diagnostic tool, but more often it is performed therapeutically with local application of corticosteroids as an alternative to medical treatment or operative decompression of the nerve root.

Recently, there has been a growing awareness of possible devastating complications of the procedure including spinal cord, brain stem, and cerebellar infarction.4 Eight major complications have been published, but in all more than 30 cases are known.5 However, many of them have not been published because they are still sub judice. Among the published cases, there is also 1 case in which CSNRB was performed under CT guidance.6 In this case, a transforaminal access was chosen.

For most of the complications, an embolic mechanism from inadvertent injection of highly particulate material in the nerve root artery has been assumed.7

In 2007, complications were analyzed after an anonymous survey, and proposals were made to reduce the probability of their occurrence: the use of real-time fluoroscopy to detect vascular uptake, nonparticulate corticosteroids such as dexamethasone, and microbore extension tubing (“pigtail”) to minimize needle manipulation while changing syringes.5

CT guidance for dorsal access offers the possibility of still performing a selective block, as the contrast distribution pattern demonstrates. For the therapeutic efficiency of corticoids, it may not be important if the target point is located slightly more distal because of diffusional spread and strong axonal transport of corticoids.8 However, if an intraspinal epidural (less selective) distribution of the corticoid is intended, the conventional, or even a translaminar, approach is more suitable.

The prone position can mostly be made comfortable for the patient, with the use of pillows except for rare cases of patients with obstructive pulmonary disease or hyperkyphosis from ankylosing spondylitis. A comfortable positioning together with ample local anesthesia reduces problems of patient motion.

In our opinion, the above-described technique leads to minimization of the danger of inadvertent puncture of the nerve root artery compared with the conventional technique for 2 reasons: 1) the target point lies anteriorly to the plane in which the nerve root and the radicular artery can be expected and 2) the angle between the needle and the presumed course of the radicular artery is much more obtuse. Also, the vertebral artery is less at risk for puncture with the dorsal approach. The risk for puncture of the carotid and jugular vessels as well as the pharynx is negligible because they lie anteriorly. Apart from the advantages in security, the technique is simple, not very time consuming, and the required radiation dose is in an acceptable range.

References

  1. ↵
    Cluff R, Mehio AK, Cohen SP, et al. The technical aspects of epidural steroid injections: a national survey. Anesth Analg 2002;95:403–08
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Wagner AL. CT fluoroscopic-guided cervical nerve root blocks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:43–44
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Manchikanti L. The growth of interventional pain management in the new millennium: a critical analysis of utilization in the Medicare population. Pain Physician 2004;7:465–82
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Rozin L, Rozin R, Koehler SA, et al. Death during transforaminal epidural steroid nerve root block (C7) due to perforation of the left vertebral artery. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2003;24:351–55
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Scanlon GC, Moeller-Bertram T, Romanowsky SM, et al. Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections: more dangerous than we think? Spine 2007;32:1249–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Suresh S, Berman J, Connell DA. Cerebellar and brainstem infarction as a complication of CT-guided transforaminal cervical nerve root block. Skeletal Radiol 2007;36:449–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Karasek M, Bogduk N. Temporary neurologic deficit after cervical transforaminal injection of local anesthetic. Pain Med 2004;5:202–05
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Frolkis VV, Tanin SA. Peculiarities of axonal transport of steroid hormones (hydrocortisone, testosterone) in spinal root fibres of adult and old rats. Neuroscience 1999;92:1399–404
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received April 18, 2008.
  • Accepted after revision May 27, 2008.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 2
February 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cervical CT-Guided, Selective Nerve Root Blocks: Improved Safety by Dorsal Approach
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Wolter, M. Mohadjer, A. Berlis, S. Knoeller
Cervical CT-Guided, Selective Nerve Root Blocks: Improved Safety by Dorsal Approach
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2009, 30 (2) 336-337; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1222

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Cervical CT-Guided, Selective Nerve Root Blocks: Improved Safety by Dorsal Approach
T. Wolter, M. Mohadjer, A. Berlis, S. Knoeller
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2009, 30 (2) 336-337; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1222
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Technique
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block: Three-dimensional Puncture Planning With Dyna-CT Is Superior to Conventional CT-guidance in an Ex Vivo Model
  • Counterpoint: Conventional Fluoroscopy-Guided Selective Cervical Nerve Root Block--A Safe, Effective, and Efficient Modality in the Hands of an Experienced Proceduralist
  • CT-Fluoroscopic Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: Extraforaminal Needle Tip Position Decreases Risk of Intravascular Injection
  • CT-Guided Cervical Transforaminal Steroid Injections: Where Should the Needle Tip Be Located?
  • CT-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block with a Dorsal Approach
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Dynamic CT Myelography: Patient Positioning
  • Evaluation of SIH MR Scoring Systems in Normals
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
Show more SPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire