Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Fig 1.
A and B, Selected sections and landmarks (see On-line Table 1) used to calculate the coronal brain metrics with examples of a full-term (A) and a preterm infant (B)
- Fig 2.
Comparison (median, 10th–90th percentiles) of the fronto-occipital, biparietal, and transverse cerebellar diameters by weeks of gestational age measured in term infants (circle) and in the preterm infants (diamond), with the results obtained during pregnancy by measuring fetal brains (square) with the same methodology. Adapted with permission from Garel.9
- Fig 3.
A and B, Comparison of bifrontal, biparietal, and transverse cerebellar diameters in preterm infants (diamond) and full-term infants (circle) by their gestational age at birth (A) and by their postmenstrual age at the time of MR imaging (B), demonstrating the lower values obtained in the preterm cohort.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Diagnostic clues and pitfalls in pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 2A
- Relationships between early postnatal cranial ultrasonography linear measures and neurodevelopment at 2 years in infants born at <30 weeks gestational age without major brain injury
- Postnatal Brain Growth Assessed by Sequential Cranial Ultrasonography in Infants Born <30 Weeks' Gestational Age
- Continuum of neurobehaviour and its associations with brain MRI in infants born preterm
- REACH: study protocol of a randomised trial of rehabilitation very early in congenital hemiplegia
- Validation of an MRI Brain Injury and Growth Scoring System in Very Preterm Infants Scanned at 29- to 35-Week Postmenstrual Age
- MRI-Based Radiologic Scoring System for Extent of Brain Injury in Children with Hemiplegia
- Brain MRI Measurements at a Term-Equivalent Age and Their Relationship to Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
- New MR Imaging Assessment Tool to Define Brain Abnormalities in Very Preterm Infants at Term
- Predictive Value of Neonatal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preterm Infants