Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

LetterLetter

Intracranial Stent Restenosis Diagnosed on Routine Duplex Follow-Up Investigation

K. Gröschel, S. Schnaudigel, J.H. Buhk, M. Knauth and A. Kastrup
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2008, 29 (8) e65; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1080
K. Gröschel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Schnaudigel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.H. Buhk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Knauth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Kastrup
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We read with great interest the article of Turk et al,1 in which the authors describe their experience with restenoses after intracranial stent placement. In this article, most of the restenoses were diagnosed by means of conventional intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) on routine follow-up investigations. Although DSA is currently the gold standard for detecting intracranial adjacent or in-stent restenosis (ISR), we would like to point out that less-invasive techniques for follow-up investigations should be considered, especially in patients with an increased risk for ISR, such as young and female patients.1 With respect to these techniques, we would like to report the following case.

A 48-year-old currently asymptomatic woman was seen in our institutional neurovascular clinic for a routine duplex follow-up investigation. Three months before presentation, a symptomatic intracranial stenosis of the right middle cerebral artery had been treated with an intracranial stent. The indication for the stent placement had been recurrent symptoms despite dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel).

Transcranial duplex sonography revealed a blunted Doppler signal intensity with flattened systolic flow acceleration at the distal end of the stent (Fig 1A). CT angiography (Fig 1B) corroborated this finding showing a compromised arterial filling distal to the stent but failed to depict the stent lumen. Subsequent DSA (Fig 1C) documented bilateral stenoses on both sides of the stent.

This case illustrates that ISR can be assessed noninvasively with transcranial duplex sonography. A typical finding of an intracranial stenosis on transcranial Doppler sonography is mean flow velocity flow acceleration >100 cm/s.2 However, within high-grade or tandem stenoses, as in our patient, reduced blood flow velocities can be found. These can then be graded according to the thrombolysis in myocardial ischemia flow grades.3

Patients with intracranial stents require close follow-up. If the anatomy of the temporal bone window allows sufficient transcranial insonation, noninvasive Doppler or duplex sonography should be considered as the primary technique to screen for ISR. However, in some cases, there will still be a need to confirm abnormal findings with additional imaging techniques. Whether traditional CT angiography, MR angiography, or flat-panel-detector angiographic CT4 is sufficient in this scenario is still under debate.

  Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A, Transcranial duplex sonography of the right middle cerebral artery showing compromised flow velocities distal to stent in a depth of 48 mm. B, CT angiography demonstrates a reduced filling at the distal part of the stent. C, Finally, intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography reveals bilateral restenoses on both sides of the stent (black arrows).

References

  1. ↵
    Turk AS, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, et al. Influence of patient age and stenosis location on Wingspan in-stent restenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:23–27. Epub 2007 Nov 7
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. Feldmann E, Wilterdink JL, Kosinski A, et al. The Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial. Neurology 2007;68:2099–106
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Demchuk AM, Burgin WS, Christou I, et al. Thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) transcranial Doppler flow grades predict clinical severity, early recovery, and mortality in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 2001;32:89–93
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Benndorf G, Strother CM, Claus B, et al. Angiographic CT in cerebrovascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1813–18
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 8
September 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intracranial Stent Restenosis Diagnosed on Routine Duplex Follow-Up Investigation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
K. Gröschel, S. Schnaudigel, J.H. Buhk, M. Knauth, A. Kastrup
Intracranial Stent Restenosis Diagnosed on Routine Duplex Follow-Up Investigation
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2008, 29 (8) e65; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1080

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Intracranial Stent Restenosis Diagnosed on Routine Duplex Follow-Up Investigation
K. Gröschel, S. Schnaudigel, J.H. Buhk, M. Knauth, A. Kastrup
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2008, 29 (8) e65; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1080
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Angiographic CT after Intravenous Contrast Agent Application: A Noninvasive Follow-Up Tool after Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting
  • Crossref (1)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Angiographic CT after Intravenous Contrast Agent Application: A Noninvasive Follow-Up Tool after Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting
    M.-N. Psychogios, P. Schramm, J.-H. Buhk, A. Xyda, K. Gröschel, K. Jung, M. Knauth
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2010 31 10

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire