Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHead and Neck Imaging

Myoepithelioma of the Parotid Gland: CT Imaging Findings

S. Wang, H. Shi, L. Wang and Q. Yu
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2008, 29 (7) 1372-1375; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1109
S. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Shi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Q. Yu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Myoepitheliomas (MEs) are rare tumors of the parotid gland. Only a few case reports describing CT imaging features of ME have been published. The aim of this study was to describe and characterize the CT findings of MEs of the parotid gland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed CT images of ME with pathologic correlation in 10 cases (4 men and 6 women; age range, 30–70 years) collected between August 2003 and October 2007 from our pathologic database. All of the CT images were retrospectively evaluated with respect to the location, size, marginal morphology, enhancement, and enhancement pattern by 2 experienced radiologists.

RESULTS: Nine tumors were located in the superficial lobe of the parotid gland, and 1 was located in the tail of parotid gland. All of the tumors abut on the capsule of the gland. Nine tumors had well-defined margins with lobulations in 5 patients. Two cases showed homogenous enhancement. In the other 8 cases, the enhancement was inhomogeneous because of enhancing nodules and nonenhancing areas of linear bands, slitlike-shaped or of cystic configuration.

CONCLUSION: CT imaging findings of MEs were well circumscribed, enhancing the mass lesion with smooth or lobulated margins, located chiefly in the superficial lobe and abutted on the capsule of the gland. They may contain enhancing nodules and nonenhancing areas of linear bands, slitlike-shaped or of cystic configuration. Although MEs are a rarity, they should be suspected when a tumor shows all of the characteristics noted here.

Myoepithelioma (ME) is a benign salivary gland tumor composed almost exclusively of sheets, islands, or cords of cells with myoepitheliomal differentiation.1 MEs account for 1.5% of all of the tumors in the major and minor salivary glands,2 and 40% arise in the parotid glands.2 The use of CT for the assessment of parotid tumors is well established. Although much has been written on the CT appearance of the pleomorphic adenomas and Warthin tumors,3-9 the detailed imaging features of MEs of the parotid gland have not been described previously in the English language literature. In this study, we describe the CT appearance of 10 histologically proven cases of MEs of the parotid gland.

Materials and Methods

Patients

We retrospectively reviewed CT images of MEs with pathologic correlation in 10 cases (3 men and 7 women; age range, 30–70 years; mean age, 47.5 years) collected between August 2003 and October 2007 from our pathologic data base.

CT Imaging Technique

CT images were obtained in LightSpeed-16 (GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wis). All of the cases were imaged with 5-mm contiguous section thickness. The images were acquired at 120 kV and 250 mA, with a pitch of 1 mm and a 1-second scan time, followed by reconstruction by using the soft tissue algorithm. Bolus intravenous dose of 70 mL of nonionic contrast (300 mg/mL) was given to all of the 10 patients at the rate of 2.0–2.5 mL/s. Scanning was initiated 40 seconds after the onset of contrast injection. All of the images were available on PACS program, and CT densities were measured on the workstation (GE 4.1).

CT Image Analysis

All of the CT images were retrospectively evaluated with respect to location, size, marginal morphology, enhancement, and enhancement pattern. The tumors were presumed to be enhancing if the attenuation of postcontrast CT scan was 20 Hounsfield units (HUs) more than the precontrast CT scan. The enhancement patterns were divided into homogenous (uniform) and inhomogeneous (nonuniform). The nonhomogenously enhancing tumors could include the enhancing nodules and nonenhancing areas of linear bands, slitlike-shaped or of cystic configuration. The enhancing nodules were defined as 40 HU increased after postcontrast scan and having a round or ovoid shape. A lesion having a central hypoattenuated area with 3 or more thin lines was termed “slitlike-shaped,” whereas a “cystic area” was defined as having a CT scan attenuation of 25 HU or less. Two senior qualified head and neck radiologists and 1 pathologist correlated the CT image and pathologic specimen.

Results

CT Imaging Findings

Size, Location, and Marginal Morphology.

The average maximal cross-sectional diameter was 1.7 cm (range, 0.90–2.74 cm; Table). Nine tumors were located in the superficial lobe of the parotid gland, and 1 was located in the tail of parotid gland. All of the tumors abut on the capsule of the gland. Nine of the tumors had well-defined margins, and the remaining one had an indistinct margin (Fig 2) because of inflammation. There were lobulated margins in 5 tumors. On CT, a capsulelike low attenuation rim was detected in only 2 tumors.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Summary of results

Enhancement Behavior.

All of the tumors were enhanced. The average CT attenuation of precontrast scans was 29.78 HU (range, 23.00–39.00 HU), and the average maximal CT attenuation of postcontrast scan was 108.37 HU (range, 80.00–146.00 HU). The tumor showed homogenous enhancement in 2 cases (20%; Fig 1). The remaining 8 (80%) of the 10 tumors showed inhomogeneous enhancement, with enhancing nodules in 8 tumors, cystic areas in 3 tumors (Fig 2), slitlike-shaped nonenhancing area in 3 tumors (Fig 3), and linear nonenhancing bands in 2 tumors (Fig 4). One tumor showed 2 calcifications (Fig 2).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 62-year-old woman with ME. A, Precontrast axial CT scan shows a round, well-defined mass (27.39 HU) in the superficial lobe of the right parotid gland abutting on the capsule of gland (arrow). B, Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows the mass (102.11 HU) with homogeneous strong enhancement (arrow). C, Microscopic examination (hematoxylin-eosin stain [HE]; ×2) shows that the ME (M) is separated from the parotid gland and the surrounding soft tissues by a fibrous capsule (FC). The stroma is scanty. D, Microscopic examination (HE; ×100) shows that the tumor is composed of the plasmacytoid and spindle cells. Relatively large vessels are seen in the tumor (arrows).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A 66-year-old woman with ME. A, Precontrast axial CT scan shows an indistinct margin mass in the superficial lobe of the left parotid gland abutting on the capsule of the gland with calcification (arrow). B, Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows the mass with inhomogeneous enhancement. It contains a central enhancing nodule (small black arrow) and a nonenhancing peripheral cystic component (white arrow). C, Microscopic examination (HE; ×10) shows the epithelioid nest (arrow) with a lot of vessels and a cystic component in the center (black asterisk). D, Microscopic examination (HE; ×20) shows the inflamed cells (long arrows) and the tumor cells (short arrow).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A 56-year-old woman with ME. A, Contrast-enhanced multiplanar reformatted coronal CT scan shows a well-defined mass in the tail of the right parotid gland with inhomogeneous enhancement (white arrow). Note the slitlike-shaped nonenhancing area (small black arrow). B, Microscopic examination (HE; ×40) shows that there are hemorrhage (stars) and tumor cells (arrow) in the stroma.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

A 54-year-old man with ME. A, Precontrast axial CT scan shows a well-defined mass with a lobulated margin in the superficial lobe of the right parotid gland abutted on the capsule of the gland (arrow). B, Contrast-enhanced axial CT scan shows the mass with inhomogeneous enhancement. It contains enhancing nodules (arrows) and nonenhancing linear band (arrowheads). C, Microscopic examination (HE; ×2) shows the stroma (black asterisks) and epithelioid nests (arrows) with a lot of vessels. D, Microscopic examination (HE; ×100) shows that the nest is composed of plasmacytoid.

Pathologic Findings

All of the patients underwent surgery. The histopathologic diagnosis of ME was made in all 10 of the cases (Table). One of the cases was a recurrence. All of the tumors had epithelial nets with plentiful blood vessels (Fig 1). The abundant surrounding stroma, either collagenous or mucoid, were seen in 5 tumors and hemorrhage in 3 of the 6 tumors (Fig 3). Cystic changes were seen in 3 tumors (Fig 2). All of the tumors had a thin fibrous capsule and were well circumscribed, but one was noncircumscribed because of infection (Fig 2).

The immunocytochemistry was detected in 6 of the 10 tumors. The result showed that myoepithelial cells stain positive for cytokeratin, and muscle-specific actin, express S-100 protein, and glial fibrillary acidic protein were positive in all of the tumors.

Discussion

Benign adenomas account for 65.5% of salivary gland tumors.10 MEs were recognized as a histologically distinct entity in 1991 by the World Health Organization.11 An incidence of 1%–7% of all primary salivary gland tumors is often cited.2 The incidence of 4.68% in our hospital falls within this range.

ME is a benign salivary gland tumor composed almost exclusively of sheets, islands, or cords of cells with myoepithelial differentiation that may exhibit spindle, plasmacytoid, epithelioid, or clear cytoplasmic features.1 Other terms that have been associated with this tumor include myoepithelial adenoma and benign myoepithelial tumor. The age of patients with ME ranges from 9 to 85 years, with an average of 44 years and the peak age of occurrence in the third decade.2 It typically presents as a solitary, slowly growing, otherwise asymptomatic mass. MEs develop preferentially in the parotid gland (40%).2 Minor salivary glands follow in frequency, especially in the palate (21%).12,13 According to a well-documented series, MEs are less prone to recur than pleomorphic adenomas.14 In our cases, 1 of 10 tumors was a recurrence. Recurrence is correlated with positive margins at the first excision.15 The recommended treatment is complete surgical excision. Benign MEs can undergo malignant transformation, especially in long-standing tumors or in tumors with multiple recurrences.16

Imaging features of ME are rarely reported in the English literature because of their low prevalence. Our study showed that 9 tumors were located in the superficial lobe of the parotid gland, 1 was located in the tail of parotid gland, and all of the tumors abutted the capsule of the gland. Two cases showed homogenous enhancement. The remaining 8 cases demonstrated inhomogeneous enhancement with enhancing nodules, the presence of cystic areas in 3 tumors (Fig 2), slitlike-shaped area in 3 tumors (Fig 3), and linear bands in 2 tumors (Fig 4).

By correlating the CT appearances and the microscopic specimens, we concluded that the enhancing nodules on CT were most probably due to epithelial nets with plentiful blood vessels and that nonenhancing linear bands on CT were most probably due to either collagenous or mucoid stroma. Also, we postulated that the slitlike-shaped nonenhancing area might correspond with stroma surrounding hemorrhage.

From the standpoint of the CT scan findings, the most important differential diagnoses for ME of the parotid gland include benign pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor. The CT features of these 2 more common tumors have been described in detail in the literature. Pleomorphic adenomas show little or no enhancement in the immediate postcontrast scan but manifest increased enhancement in the delayed scan.8,9 In addition, pleomorphic adenomas could happen in superficial and/or deep lobes of the parotid and not often abut the capsule of the gland. Relatively large cystic changes were seen in 3 of 10 tumors in our study (Fig 2). These changes are more frequent in MEs than in pleomorphic adenomas.

Warthin tumors show enhancement in the immediate postcontrast scan.9 These features are similar to MEs; however, radiologic demonstration of enhancing nodules formation is more common in MEs, and lobulated contours were seen in half of the cases in our study and are more frequent in MEs than in Warthin tumors. Moreover, Warthin tumor is more common in elderly men than in women and can be multifocal and bilateral in 10%–15% of patients.17,18 In addition, parotid scintigraphy by using technetium Tc99m-pertechnetate is useful for the diagnosis of a Warthin tumor.19 Low-grade malignant tumors usually demonstrate similar CT findings to benign tumors. Imaging findings are usually nonspecific and indistinguishable from those of benign parotid tumors.

Conclusions

CT imaging findings of MEs were well circumscribed, enhancing mass lesions with smooth or lobulated margins, located chiefly in the superficial lobe and abutted on the capsule of the gland. They may contain enhancing nodules and nonenhancing areas of linear bands, slitlike-shaped or of cystic configuration. Although MEs are a rarity, they should be suspected when a tumor shows all of the characteristics noted here.

References

  1. ↵
    Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press;2005 :259
  2. ↵
    Ellis GL, Auclair PL. Tumors of the salivary glands, third series, Fascicle 17. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology;1996 :80–94
  3. ↵
    Bryan RN, Miller RH, Ferreyro RI, et al. Computed tomography of the major salivary glands. Am J Roentgenol 1982;139:547–54
    PubMed
  4. Casselman JW, Mancuso AA. Major salivary gland masses: comparison of MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1987;165:183–89
    PubMed
  5. Sone S, Higashihara T, Morimoto S, et al. CT of parotid tumors. Am J Neuroradiol 1982;3:143–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. Golding S. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Br J Radiol 1982;55:182–88
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. Silvers AR, Som PS. Salivary glands. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:941–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Lev MH, Khanduja K, Morris PP, et al. Parotid pleomorphic adenomas: delayed CT enhancement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1835–39
    Abstract
  9. ↵
    Choi DS, Na DG, Byun HS, et al. Salivary gland tumors: evaluation with two-phase helical CT. Radiology 2000;214:231–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Jang M, Park D, Lee SR, et al. Basal cell adenoma in the parotid gland: CT and MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:631–35
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Seifert G, Sobin LH. Histological typing of salivary gland tumors. In: World Health Organization International Histological Classification of Tumors, 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag;1991 :20–21
  12. ↵
    Barnes L, Appel BN, Perez H, et al. Myoepithelioma of the head and neck: case report and review. J Surg Oncol 1985;28:21–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Waldron CA. Mixed tumor (pleomorphic adenoma) and myoepithelioma. In: Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR, eds. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1991 :165–86
  14. ↵
    Sciubba JJ, Brannon RB. Myoepithelioma of salivary glands: report of 23 cases, Cancer 1982;49:562–72
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    El-Naggar A, Batsakis JG, Luna MA, et al. DNA content and proliferative activity of myoepitheliomas. J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:1192–97
    PubMed
  16. ↵
    Alos L, Cardesa A, Bombi JA, et al. Myoepithelial tumours of salivary glands: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural and flow cytometric study. Semin Diagn Pathol 1996;13:138–47
    PubMed
  17. ↵
    Howlett DC, Kesse KW, Hughes DV, et al. The role of imaging in the evaluation of parotid disease. Clin Radiol 2002;57:692–701
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Eveson JW, Cawson RA. Salivary gland tumors: a review of 2410 cases with particular reference to histological types, site, age and sex distribution. J Pathol 1985;146:51–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Miyake H, Matsumoto A, Hori Y, et al. Warthin's tumor of parotid gland on Tc-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy with lemon juice stimulation: Tc-99m uptake, size, and pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 2001;11:2472–78
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received December 27, 2007.
  • Accepted after revision March 3, 2008.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 7
August 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Myoepithelioma of the Parotid Gland: CT Imaging Findings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Wang, H. Shi, L. Wang, Q. Yu
Myoepithelioma of the Parotid Gland: CT Imaging Findings
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2008, 29 (7) 1372-1375; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1109

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Myoepithelioma of the Parotid Gland: CT Imaging Findings
S. Wang, H. Shi, L. Wang, Q. Yu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2008, 29 (7) 1372-1375; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1109
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (23)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • CT and MR imaging findings of palatal tumors
    Hiroki Kato, Masayuki Kanematsu, Hiroki Makita, Keizo Kato, Daijiro Hatakeyama, Toshiyuki Shibata, Keisuke Mizuta, Mitsuhiro Aoki
    European Journal of Radiology 2014 83 3
  • Research on the Practical Classification and Privacy Protection of CT Images of Parotid Tumors based on ResNet50 Model
    Jiantin Yuan, Yangyang Fan, Xiaoyi Lv, Chen Chen, Debao Li, Yue Hong, Yan Wang
    Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2020 1576 1
  • Myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland: pathologic and CT imaging characteristics (report of 10 cases and literature review)
    Dong Yue, Wen Feng, Cai Ning, Li Xiao Han, Luo YaHong
    Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 2017 123 6
  • MRI and CT imaging characteristics of myoepithelioma of the parotid gland
    Jianhui Ding, Wei Wang, Weijun Peng, Xiaoyan Zhou, Tongzhen Chen
    Acta Radiologica 2016 57 7
  • The key radiologic and cytomorphologic features of oncocytic and oncocytoid lesions of the salivary gland
    Daniel Lubin, Sharon Song, Hanna M. Zafar, Zubair Baloch
    Diagnostic Cytopathology 2019 47 6
  • Epithelioid Myoepithelioma of the Accessory Parotid Gland: Pathological and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings
    Hiroyoshi Iguchi, Kei Yamada, Hideo Yamane, Shigeo Hashimoto
    Case Reports in Oncology 2014 7 2
  • Myoepithelioma of the parotid gland in a child: a case report
    Huseyin Yaman, Mustafa Gerek, Fuat Tosun, Salih Deveci, Erbil Kılıç, Hasan Huseyin Arslan
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2010 45 7
  • Myoepithelioma of the Parotid Gland: A Case Report with Review of the Literature and Classic Histopathology
    Mark Weitzel, Jason E. Cohn, Harvey Spector
    Case Reports in Otolaryngology 2017 2017
  • Plasmacytoid Myoepithelioma of the Palate: Case Report
    Matina T. Zormpa, Asimina S. Sarigelou, Anna N. Eleftheriou, Anthoula S. Assimaki, Alexandros E. Kolokotronis
    Head and Neck Pathology 2011 5 2
  • Spindle cell myoepithelioma of the parotid gland
    Suk Joon Oh, Dukju Moon
    Archives of Craniofacial Surgery 2019 20 5

More in this TOC Section

  • FDG Uptake and Thyroid Cancer Post-BRAF Therapy
  • Normal Facial Nerve Enhancement on VIBE Sequence
  • Lipochoristomas and inner ear signal
Show more Head and Neck Imaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire