Changes in Aqueductal CSF Stroke Volume and Progression of Symptoms in Patients With Unshunted Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

References

1. ↵
   Adams RD, Fischer CM, Hakim S, et al. Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117–26

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Black PM. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Results of shunting in 62 patients. J Neurosurg 1980;52:371–77

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Bergsneider M, Black PM, Klinge P, et al. Surgical management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57 (3 Suppl):S29–39; discussion ii–v.
4. ↵
   Savolainen S, Paljärvi L, Vapalahti M. Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in patients investigated for presumed normal pressure hydrocephalus: a clinical and neuropathological study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:849–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Thomsen C, Ståhlberg F, Stabgaard M, et al. Fourier analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow velocities: MRI Imaging study. The Scandinavian Flow Group. Radiology 1990;177:659–65

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Lee JH, Lee HK, Kim JK, et al. CSF flow quantification of the cerebral aqueduct in normal volunteers using phase contrast cine MR imaging. Korean J Radiol 2004;5:81–86

   PubMed
7. ↵
   Bradley WG Jr, Scalzo D, Queralt J, et al. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523–29

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Evans AJ, Iwai F, Grist TA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow with a phase subtraction technique. In vitro and in vivo validation. Invest Radiol 1993;28:109–15

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Pelc LR, Pelc NJ, Rayhill SC, et al. Arterial and venous blood flow: noninvasive quantitation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:809–12

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Dirven C, et al. Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 1992;42:54–59

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Davies GA, et al. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Is cisternography still useful in selecting patients for a shunt? Arch Neurol 1992;49:366–70

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Walchenbach R, Geiger E, Thomeer RT, et al. The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:503–06

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, et al. The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with the idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol 1995;52:783–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, et al. Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg 1997;87:687–93

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Williams MA, Razumovsky AY, Hanley DF. Comparison of PCSF monitoring and controlled CSF drainage diagnose normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1998;71:328–30

    PubMed
17. ↵
    Raftopoulos C, Chaskis C, Delecluse F, et al. Morphological quantitative analysis of intracranial pressure waves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 1992;14:389–96

    PubMed
18. ↵
    Bradley WG Jr, Kortman KE, Burgoyne B. Flowing cerebrospinal fluid in normal pressure hydrocephalic states: appearance on MR images. Radiology 1986;159:611–16

    PubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Jack CR Jr, Mokri B, Laws ER Jr, et al. MR findings in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: significance and comparison with other forms of dementia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:923–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Bradley WG Jr, Whittemore AR, Kortman KE, et al. Marked cerebrospinal fluid void: indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Radiology 1991;178:459–66

    PubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Mascalchi M, Arnetoli G, Inzitari D, et al. Cine-MR imaging of aqueductal CSF flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus syndrome before and after CSF shunt. Acta Radiol 1993;34:586–92

    PubMed
22. ↵
    Bradley WG Jr. MR prediction of shunt response in NPH: CSF morphology versus physiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1285–86

    PubMed
23. ↵
    Nitz WR, Bradley WG Jr, Watanabe AS, et al. Flow dynamics in cerebrospinal fluid: assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with a retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology 1992;183:395–405

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Fisher CM. Hydrocephalus as a cause of disturbances of gait in the elderly. Neurology 1982;32:1358–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    Kimura M, Tanaka A, Yoshinaga S. Significance of periventricular hemodynamics in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 1992;30:701–04; discussion 704–05

    PubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Miyake H, Ohta T, Kajimoto Y, et al. Diamox challenge test to decide indications for cerebrospinal fluid shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:1187–93

    CrossRefPubMed