Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Changes in T2 Relaxation Times Associated with Maturation of the Human Intervertebral Disk

E.C. Krueger, J.O. Perry, Y. Wu and V.M. Haughton
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2007, 28 (7) 1237-1241; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0546
E.C. Krueger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.O. Perry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V.M. Haughton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Four selected images at TE of 19, 38, 56, and 75 ms from the modified FSE sequence illustrate the loss of signal intensity from the spinal tissues and L4-L5 disk with increasing TE. Disk tissue loses signal intensity less rapidly than vertebrae. The T2 relaxation time, the length of time required for the signal intensity to diminish by 50%, is calculated for each voxel from 16 such images.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Sagittal MR image showing the placement of a region of interest (dotted line) and the line superior to inferior in the intervertebral disk along which T2 values were sampled and plotted as a function of distance to calculate the effect of the central region of low signal intensity on the T2 relaxation times.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Sagittal T2-weighted MR images (A), color map of the T2 relaxation times in a sagittal section (B) and surface contour plot of T2 relaxation times in a sagittal section (C) for an L2-L3 disk in a 6-year-old subject (group 1). The plot shows the anterior edge of the disk to the reader's left and the posterior edge to the reader's right. The upper margin of the disk is toward the top of the page and the lower margin, toward the bottom. The plot shows highest values of T2 near the central portion of the disk. In the central region, the T2 values are relatively uniform.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Sagittal T2-weighted MR images (A), color map of the T2 relaxation times in a sagittal section (B), and surface contour plot of T2 relaxation times in a sagittal section (C) for an L2-L3 disk in a 19-year-old subject, displayed in the same manner as Fig 3. This plot shows a band of diminished T2 values in the central portion of the disk, where fibrous tissue content increases during maturation of the disk. This band is found commonly in the 19- and 20-year-olds in this study and rarely in the younger subjects.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    T2 relaxation times on a line superior to inferior through the center of an L4-L5 disk in a 6-year-old subject and of an L2-L3 disk in a 19-year-old. This plot shows the CLSIR as a dip in the T2 relaxation times along the superior-inferior axis of the disk in the older subject. It also shows the relatively greater relaxation times of T2 in the older group. T2 relaxation times are shown on the vertical axis, and the distance from the superior endplate is shown along the horizontal axis.

Tables

  • Figures
  • T2 relaxation times for intervertebral disks of subjects in group 1 and group 2

    Level
    Age (years)L1-L2L2-L3L3-L4L4-L5L5-S1Average
    Group 10.7563.069.785.580.582.176.2
    389.8126.6122.489.088.7103.3
    377.080.384.794.9104.088.2
    667.877.189.1100.199.586.7
    Average74.488.495.491.193.688.6
    Group 219122.7157.2121.5144.4107.0130.6
    1997.4102.8108.491.2107.2101.4
    2081.589.797.5117.890.995.5
    2093.8127.8117.7116.9125.7116.4
    20–77.9102.6123.099.6100.8
    Average98.9111.1109.5118.7106.1108.8
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 7
August 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Changes in T2 Relaxation Times Associated with Maturation of the Human Intervertebral Disk
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
E.C. Krueger, J.O. Perry, Y. Wu, V.M. Haughton
Changes in T2 Relaxation Times Associated with Maturation of the Human Intervertebral Disk
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2007, 28 (7) 1237-1241; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0546

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Changes in T2 Relaxation Times Associated with Maturation of the Human Intervertebral Disk
E.C. Krueger, J.O. Perry, Y. Wu, V.M. Haughton
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2007, 28 (7) 1237-1241; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0546
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MR Imaging Assessment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Age-Related Changes: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient versus T2 Quantitation
  • Spinal Growth Modulation with Use of a Tether in an Immature Porcine Model
  • Crossref (22)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • T2 Relaxation Times of Intervertebral Disc Tissue Correlated With Water Content and Proteoglycan Content
    Nicholas L. Marinelli, Victor M. Haughton, Alejandro Muñoz, Paul A. Anderson
    Spine 2009 34 5
  • Susceptibility‐weighted imaging: current status and future directions
    Saifeng Liu, Sagar Buch, Yongsheng Chen, Hyun‐Seok Choi, Yongming Dai, Charbel Habib, Jiani Hu, Joon‐Yong Jung, Yu Luo, David Utriainen, Meiyun Wang, Dongmei Wu, Shuang Xia, E. Mark Haacke
    NMR in Biomedicine 2017 30 4
  • Spinal Growth Modulation with Use of a Tether in an Immature Porcine Model
    Peter O Newton, Vidyadhar V Upasani, Christine L Farnsworth, Richard Oka, Reid C Chambers, Jerry Dwek, Jung Ryul Kim, Andrew Perry, Andrew T Mahar
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 2008 90 12
  • Parametric T2 and T2* mapping techniques to visualize intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with low back pain: initial results on the clinical use of 3.0 Tesla MRI
    Goetz Hannes Welsch, Siegfried Trattnig, Tatjana Paternostro-Sluga, Klaus Bohndorf, Sabine Goed, David Stelzeneder, Tallal Charles Mamisch
    Skeletal Radiology 2011 40 5
  • Correlation between T2 relaxation time and intervertebral disk degeneration
    Hiroyuki Takashima, Tsuneo Takebayashi, Mitsunori Yoshimoto, Yoshinori Terashima, Hajime Tsuda, Kazunori Ida, Toshihiko Yamashita
    Skeletal Radiology 2012 41 2
  • T1rho and T2 relaxation times for lumbar disc degeneration: an in vivo comparative study at 3.0-Tesla MRI
    Yi-Xiang J. Wang, Feng Zhao, James F. Griffith, Greta S. P. Mok, Jason C. S. Leung, Anil T. Ahuja, Jing Yuan
    European Radiology 2013 23 1
  • Analysis of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and biomechanical parameters on human discs with different grades of degeneration
    John Antoniou, Laura M. Epure, Arthur J. Michalek, Michael P. Grant, James C. Iatridis, Fackson Mwale
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2013 38 6
  • MR Imaging Assessment of Lumbar Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Age-Related Changes: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient versus T2 Quantitation
    G. Niu, J. Yang, R. Wang, S. Dang, E.X. Wu, Y. Guo
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2011 32 9
  • Analysis of chronic low back pain with magnetic resonance imaging T2 mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc
    Izaya Ogon, Tsuneo Takebayashi, Hiroyuki Takashima, Katsumasa Tanimoto, Kazunori Ida, Mitsunori Yoshimoto, Hiroyoshi Fujiwara, Toshikazu Kubo, Toshihiko Yamashita
    Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2015 20 2
  • Evaluation of intervertebral disc regeneration with implantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) using quantitative T2 mapping: a study in rabbits
    Feng Cai, Xiao-Tao Wu, Xin-Hui Xie, Feng Wang, Xin Hong, Su-Yang Zhuang, Lei Zhu, Yun-Feng Rui, Rui Shi
    International Orthopaedics 2015 39 1

More in this TOC Section

  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
  • Cone Beam CT Myelography
  • Post-Procedural Brachial Neuritis Features
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire