Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

Physiologic and Anatomic Assessment of a Canine Carotid Artery Stenosis Model Utilizing Phase Contrast with Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Imaging

A.S. Turk, K.M. Johnson, D. Lum, D. Niemann, B. Aagaard-Kienitz, D. Consigny, J. Grinde, P. Turski, V. Haughton and C. Mistretta
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2007, 28 (1) 111-115;
A.S. Turk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.M. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Lum
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Niemann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Aagaard-Kienitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Consigny
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Grinde
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Turski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Haughton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Mistretta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2005 Update. Dallas: American Heart Association;2005
  2. ↵
    Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415–25
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–87
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Mayberg MR, Wilson SE, Yatsu F, et al. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis: Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. JAMA 1991;266:3289–94
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Turnipseed WD, Kennell TW, Turski PA, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates. Surgery 1993;114:643–48
    PubMedWeb of Science
  6. Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation: Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 1995;26:1753–58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Nederkoorn PJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Stroke 2002;33:2003–08
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Pijls NHJ, Gelder BV, Pepijn VV, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995;92:3183–93
  9. Prendergast BD, Kerr F, Starkey IR. Normalization of abnormal coronary fractional flow reserve associated with myocardial bridging using an intracoronary stent. Heart 2000;83:705–07
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Aude YW, Garza L. How to prevent unnecessary coronary interventions: identifying lesions responsible for ischemia in the cath lab. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003;18:394–99
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Gross CM, Kramer J, Weingartner O, et al. Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter. Radiology 2001;220:751–56
    PubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Murphy KD, Encarnacion CE, Le VA, et al. Iliac artery stent placement with the Palmaz stent: follow-up study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6:321–29
    PubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Palmaz JC, Garcia OJ, Schatz RA, et al. Placement of balloon-expandable intraluminal stents in iliac arteries: first 171 procedures. Radiology 1990;174 (3 Pt 2):969–75
  14. Kinney TB, Rose SC. Intraarterial pressure measurements during angiographic evaluation of peripheral vascular disease: techniques, interpretation, applications, and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:277–84
    PubMedWeb of Science
  15. Tetteroo E, Haaring C, van der Graaf Y, et al. Intraarterial pressure gradients after randomized angioplasty or stenting of iliac artery lesions: Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996;19:411–17
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Kadir S, White RI Jr, Kaufman SL, et al. Long-term results of aortoiliac angioplasty. Surgery 1983;94:10–14
    PubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:743–49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Du J, Fain SB, Gu T, et al. Noise reduction in MR angiography with nonlinear anisotropic filtering. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:632–39
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Yang GZ, Kilner PJ, Wood NB, et al. Computation of flow pressure fields from magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:520–26
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. Nasiraei-Moghaddam A, Behrens G, Fatouraee N, et al. Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:300–09
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. Thompson RB, McVeigh ER. Fast measurement of intracardiac pressure differences with 2D breath-hold phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:1056–66
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Tyszka JM, Laidlaw DH, Asa JW, et al. Three-dimensional, time-resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:321–29
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135–60
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Cross JJ, et al. Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods. Stroke 2004;35:2083–88
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Heiserman JE, Zabramski JM, Drayer BP, et al. Clinical significance of the flow gap in carotid magnetic resonance angiography. J Neurosurg 1996;85:384–87
    PubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 1
January 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physiologic and Anatomic Assessment of a Canine Carotid Artery Stenosis Model Utilizing Phase Contrast with Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.S. Turk, K.M. Johnson, D. Lum, D. Niemann, B. Aagaard-Kienitz, D. Consigny, J. Grinde, P. Turski, V. Haughton, C. Mistretta
Physiologic and Anatomic Assessment of a Canine Carotid Artery Stenosis Model Utilizing Phase Contrast with Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2007, 28 (1) 111-115;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Physiologic and Anatomic Assessment of a Canine Carotid Artery Stenosis Model Utilizing Phase Contrast with Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Imaging
A.S. Turk, K.M. Johnson, D. Lum, D. Niemann, B. Aagaard-Kienitz, D. Consigny, J. Grinde, P. Turski, V. Haughton, C. Mistretta
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2007, 28 (1) 111-115;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Hemodynamic Changes in Patients with Arteriovenous Malformations Assessed Using High-Resolution 3D Radial Phase-Contrast MR Angiography
  • In Vivo Evaluation of Quantitative MR Angiography in a Canine Carotid Artery Stenosis Model
  • Fast Whole-Brain 4D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography with Velocity Encoding Using Undersampled Radial Acquisition and Highly Constrained Projection Reconstruction: Image-Quality Assessment in Volunteer Subjects
  • Velocity Measurements in the Middle Cerebral Arteries of Healthy Volunteers Using 3D Radial Phase-Contrast HYPRFlow: Comparison with Transcranial Doppler Sonography and 2D Phase-Contrast MR Imaging
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire