Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

LetterLetter

A Case Meeting Clinical Brain Death Criteria with Residual Cerebral Perfusion

Thomas A. Ala, Matthew J. Kuhn and Anton J. Johnson
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2006, 27 (9) 1805-1806;
Thomas A. Ala
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew J. Kuhn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anton J. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) studies are often used to support the diagnosis of brain death, particularly when certain conditions such as severe facial trauma, drug toxicity, or other factors prevent reliable evaluation of the clinical examination. The absence of cerebral perfusion is consistent with brain death. Exceptional cases have been reported, however, in which CBF studies have documented residual perfusion despite the patients’ meeting clinical criteria for brain death.1 We would like to present to your readers another rare example of this dissociation between cerebral perfusion and neurologic function in which a patient’s clinical examination was consistent with brain death, yet a CBF study performed shortly afterward demonstrated prominent hemispheric perfusion.

A 49-year-old man presented to our institution following cardiac arrest after a seizure. He was resuscitated in the field, with the total duration of asystole estimated to be 5 minutes. Results of urine toxicology and alcohol screens were negative. His CSF analysis was nondiagnostic. Electroencephalograms on day 1 and 3 showed low amplitude delta slowing without focality, paroxysmal activity, or interval change. A head MR imaging study on day 2 showed bilateral basal ganglionic and medial temporal lobe lesions consistent with a hypoxic-ischemic injury. He never awakened; and after an initial recovery of brain stem reflexes and respiratory effort, during the following days, he progressively lost neurologic function.

On day 5, a brain death examination was performed. His pupils were nonreactive at 4-mm diameter, and there were no corneal, cough, or gag reflexes and no ocular reflexes to either head movement or to 50 mL of ice water in each ear. He had no respiratory effort during an apnea test with a PaCO2 of 72 mm Hg. No movements were elicited by nail-bed pressure, sternal rubbing, or supraorbital pressure. The examination was recorded as being consistent with clinical brain death.

Five hours later, a nurse reported that sternal rubbing would elicit movements of the arms, legs, head, and back. Upon the request of the organ donation personnel, a cerebral perfusion scintigraphy single-photon emission CT (SPECT) scan was ordered to confirm brain death, consistent with the policies of our institution. The CBF study unexpectedly demonstrated prominent hemispheric perfusion, and organ donation plans were suspended. See Fig 1 for representative images.

On day 6, his examination continued to show no brain stem function. During 1 of several sternal rubs, the patient’s head turned to the left and his left arm rose slightly off the bed, flexed at the elbow approximately 15°, and tremored for several seconds. No other movements were observed. No further CBF, EEG, or head imaging studies were performed upon the request of the patient’s family. Later that day the patient’s heart was noted to be in asystole. Permission for autopsy was not obtained.

With the exception of the CBF study, the patient’s examination on day 5 was consistent with many accepted criteria for the clinical diagnosis of brain death—for example, those defined by the American Academy of Neurology.2 Coma, absence of brain stem reflexes, and apnea were documented, and the required prerequisites were satisfied, including neuroimaging evidence of an acute central nervous system catastrophe, the exclusion of complicating medical conditions, and a core temperature ≥32°C.

The most likely explanation for the dissociation between neurologic function and CBF in this case is that the CBF study was obtained relatively early in the course of brain death, before the intracranial pressure from cerebral edema overcame arterial pressure. A later CBF study would very likely have demonstrated the absence of perfusion. This phenomenon has been described by others,3 and some have even suggested that CBF studies performed too early in the course of brain death may confound the process of brain death declaration.4

The patient’s movements that initiated the request for the CBF study in this case are well-known in brain death.3,5 The movements may occur spontaneously or in response to stimulation, such as painful stimuli to the sternum, and are thought to be mediated at the level of the spinal cord. Such movements have included the tonic neck reflex, arm raising, and lateral head turning, similar to those observed in this patient.

We present this case to emphasize the potential difficulties that may be encountered in the evaluation of brain death. Whether to declare brain death in these rare situations is controversial, with some authorities claiming the CBF study to be a false-negative6 and others claiming that a CBF study showing residual perfusion is inconsistent with brain death.7 Physicians who deal with brain death should be aware of this possible dissociation of cerebral perfusion and the clinical brain death examination.

  Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Representative axial (A and B), coronal (C), and sagittal (D) images from the SPECT study obtained 15 minutes after the intravenous injection of 24.5 millicuries of technetium Tc99m ethyl cysteinate dimmer. Images demonstrate prominent residual hemispheric perfusion.

Footnotes

  • Poster previously presented at Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, April 16, 2002; Denver, Colo.

References

  1. ↵
    Flowers WM Jr, Patel BR. Persistence of cerebral blood flow after brain death. South Med J 2000;93:364–70
    PubMed
  2. ↵
    Wijdicks EFM. Determining brain death in adults. Neurology 1995;45:1003–11
    FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Wijdicks EFM. Clinical diagnosis and confirmatory testing of brain death in adults. In: Wijdicks EFM, ed. Brain Death. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2001 :61–90
  4. ↵
    Larar GN, Nagel JS. Technetium-99m-HMPAO cerebral perfusion scintigraphy: considerations for timely brain death declaration. J Nucl Med 1992;33:2211–13
    FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Saposnik G, Maurino J, Bueri JA. Movements in brain death. Eur J Neurol 2001;8:209–13
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Flowers WM Jr, Patel BR. Accuracy of clinical evaluation in the determination of brain death. South Med J 2000;93:203–06
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Bernat JL. On irreversibility as a prerequisite for brain death determination. Adv Exp Med Biol 2004;550:161–67
    PubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 9
October 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Case Meeting Clinical Brain Death Criteria with Residual Cerebral Perfusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Thomas A. Ala, Matthew J. Kuhn, Anton J. Johnson
A Case Meeting Clinical Brain Death Criteria with Residual Cerebral Perfusion
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2006, 27 (9) 1805-1806;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
A Case Meeting Clinical Brain Death Criteria with Residual Cerebral Perfusion
Thomas A. Ala, Matthew J. Kuhn, Anton J. Johnson
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2006, 27 (9) 1805-1806;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • When Determining Brain Death in Adults, Time Is of the Essence!: The Last Nail in the Coffin of Dual Examination in Brain Death
  • Radionuclide Evaluation of Brain Death in the Post-McMath Era
  • The case against confirmatory tests for determining brain death in adults
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire