Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

LetterLetter

Post-transplant Neurotoxicity: What Role do Calcineurin Inhibitors Actually Play?

Evelyn M. Sklar
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2006, 27 (8) 1602-1603;
Evelyn M. Sklar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

It is well known that calcineurin inhibitors (CIs; cyclosporine and tacrolimus) may induce severe neurotoxicity even at therapeutic levels.1 Major central nervous system (CNS) complications induced by CI include headaches, altered mental status (AMS), seizures, cortical blindness, auditory and visual hallucinations, spasticity, paresis, and ataxia. It is interesting that, in their recent article, Besenski et al2 found AMS, headaches, and seizures as the most common symptoms not only in the kidney transplant recipients (KTR) whom they studied, but also in a group of pretransplant patients.

The pathogenesis of CI-induced CNS toxicity remains unclear. It has not been determined whether the clinical symptoms in KTR treated with CI are due to the direct drug toxicity, hypomagnesemia or hypocholesterolemia, hypertension, or a combination of these. Is the mechanism due to demyelination, ischemia mediated by vascular spasm, or hypertension?

It has been suggested in the literature that subcortical edema is the result of a hyperperfusion insult promoted by endothelial damage with breakthrough of autoregulation in the posterior circulation, which has paucity of sympathetic innervation. MR imaging perfusion studies have shown areas of signal intensity abnormality, whereas diffusion studies have been negative. Endothelial cell damage could be responsible for direct injury to the capillary bed and alteration of the blood-brain barrier, as well as the release of potent vasoconstrictors resulting in vasospasm. Injury to the blood-brain barrier may occur and recent reports note brain enhancement in several patients.3

In the series presented by Besenski et al, none of the patients had hypomagnesemia or hypertension, and only 9% had a cholesterol level <120 mg/mL. As the authors stated, this probably contributed to the low incidence of CI CNS toxicity in their study. The authors found posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) in 5% of KTR but also in 4% of the comparison group. It is not clear from this report why the 4% of pretransplant patients had PRES, because they were not hypertensive or taking any neurotoxic medication. PRES can be seen in other conditions such as eclampsia, hypertensive encephalopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, and thrombotic microagiopathy. Besenski et al’s data suggest that, in KTR, PRES is probably not exclusively caused by direct CI CNS toxicity because the incidence was similar in KTR and in the pretransplant comparison group and in their different groups 1, 2, and 3 (the groups were based on the time interval between transplantation and MR imaging examination). They therefore suggested that the etiology of PRES in KTR is multifactorial and needs further investigation. They did note, however, that statistical power was restricted by the number of patients in their study.

The major finding in this article was that the prevalence of PRES and both acute and chronic changes did not differ significantly in pre- and post-transplant kidney recipients, and, therefore, the authors claimed that their study did not support the previously reported suggestion that those changes were mostly because of CI toxicity because the pretransplant group was not treated with CI. On the other hand, a study by Sheth et al4 of 10 asymptomatic post-transplant patients found no MR imaging abnormalities, and the authors concluded that lesions visible in patients with clinical neurotoxicity were because of cyclosporin effects and not pre-existing coincidental abnormalities. The other major finding in the paper by Besenski et al was that there was no significant difference in the prevalence of brain abnormalities in early compared with late post-transplant periods when exposure to CI is tapered. This also is in contradistinction to what has been previously published where symptoms and imaging findings have been noted to regress rapidly after discontinuation or reduction in dosage of CI and correction of potentiating factors.5

In the future, larger series of cases with appropriate control groups must be studied to obtain statistically significant numbers. Also, further investigation needs to be performed on the mechanism and pathophysiology of CI toxicity, including studies where CI is tapered and serial MR studies are obtained.

References

  1. ↵
    Palmer BF, Toto RD. Systemic neurologic toxicity induced by cyclosporine A in three renal transplant patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1991;18:116–21
  2. ↵
    Besenski N, Rumboldt Z, Emovon O, et al. Brain MR imaging abnormalities in kidney transplant recipients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2282–89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Scheinman ST, Reinitz ER, Petro G, et al. Cyclosporine central neurotoxicity following renal transplantation: report of a case using magnetic resonance images. Transplantation 1990;49:215–16
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Sheth TN, Ichise M, Kucharczyk W. Brain perfusion imaging in asymptomatic patients receiving cyclosporine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:853–56
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Jarosz JM, Howlett DC, Cox TCS, et al. Cyclosporine-related reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy: MRI. Diagn Neuroradiol 1997;39:711–15
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 8
September 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Post-transplant Neurotoxicity: What Role do Calcineurin Inhibitors Actually Play?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Evelyn M. Sklar
Post-transplant Neurotoxicity: What Role do Calcineurin Inhibitors Actually Play?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2006, 27 (8) 1602-1603;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Post-transplant Neurotoxicity: What Role do Calcineurin Inhibitors Actually Play?
Evelyn M. Sklar
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2006, 27 (8) 1602-1603;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Molecular Diagnostics of Calcineurin-Related Pathologies
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire