Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

OtherHead and Neck Imaging

Single-Shot, Turbo Spin-Echo, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging versus Spin-Echo-Planar, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Acquired Middle Ear Cholesteatoma

B. De Foer, J.-P. Vercruysse, B. Pilet, J. Michiels, R. Vertriest, M. Pouillon, T. Somers, J.W. Casselman and E. Offeciers
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2006, 27 (7) 1480-1482;
B. De Foer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-P. Vercruysse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Pilet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Michiels
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Vertriest
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Pouillon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Somers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.W. Casselman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Offeciers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Diagnosis of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma on MR imaging is mostly done on late postgadolinium T1-weighted MR images and/or echo-planar (EPI) diffusion-weighted (DWI) MR images. We describe the appearance of a case of a complicated attical middle ear cholesteatoma on single-shot (SS) turbo spin-echo (TSE) DWI compared with EPI-DWI. This case suggests a higher reliability of SS TSE-DWI in the diagnosis of acquired middle ear cholesteatoma.

Diagnosis and extension of an acquired middle ear cholesteatoma is mainly done on thin-section, high-resolution CT. In selected cases, MR imaging has an additional value in describing possible complications of a middle ear cholesteatoma, such as extension to the lateral semicircular canal and other portions of the membranous labyrinth and the middle fossa through the eroded tegmen.1 Recent reports have suggested the improvement in MR imaging techniques in diagnosing cholesteatoma with the use of delayed contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted MR images2–3 and echo-planar (EPI) diffusion-weighted (DWI) MR images1,4–8 However, numerous artifacts can be generated during acquisition of DWI, such as eddy current artifacts, susceptibility artifacts, ghosting artifacts, chemical shift, and motion artifacts. With the use of higher magnetic fields, these artifacts and image distortions on EPI-DWI are even more pronounced.9–11 Turbo spin-echo (TSE) DWI MR is known to lack significant image distortions and other artifacts. It permits fast multiplanar imaging in artifact-prone regions, such as the posterior fossa and the inferior frontal and temporal lobes.12

Case Report

A 76-year-old man presented with chronic ear discharge at the otorhinolaryngology department. Otoscopic findings revealed a tympanic membrane perforation and retraction with suspicion of a partially evacuated cholesteatoma. CT of the left ear revealed a soft tissue lesion (0.8 cm) in the attic with loss of the bony delineation of the anterior limb of the lateral semicircular canal (Fig 1) and the tegmen (Fig 2). Erosion of the incus body as well as the short and long process of the incus was noted (Fig 1). MR imaging was performed for evaluation of possible invasion into the membranous labyrinth and the middle cranial fossa. MR imaging was done on a 1.5T superconductive system (Avanto; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Imaging parameters are detailed in Table 1. Coronal thin-section, T2-weighted MR imaging revealed a slightly hyperintense nodular lesion under the tegmen delineated on its lateral side by clearly more hyperintense material (Fig 3). Late (45′) postgadolinium T1-weighted MR imaging in the coronal plane showed a small, nonenhancing lesion surrounded by enhancing material mainly on its lateral side that was strongly suspected to be an attical, nonenhancing cholesteatoma (5 mm) surrounded by enhancing inflammatory tissue (Fig 4). No enhancement was noted in the membranous labyrinth or in the middle cranial fossa. On (B1000) EPI-DWI images, a curvilinear hyperintensity under the temporal lobe was seen on both sides. A clear nodular hyperintensity suspicious for a cholesteatoma could not be noted (Fig 5). The single-shot TSE-DWI showed no curvilinear hyperintensity at the air-bone interface of the temporal bone and obviously demonstrated a small nodular hyperintensity immediately under the temporal lobe highly suggestive of a small cholesteatoma (Fig 6). On the basis of the late postgadolinium T1-weighted images and single-shot TSE-DWI, an attical cholesteatoma with surrounding inflammation without middle cranial fossa and membranous labyrinth invasion was diagnosed. Surgery confirmed the presence of a 5-mm large attical cholesteatoma surrounded by inflammation with erosion of the lateral semicircular canal but without invasion of the membranous labyrinth. The tegmen was thinned but not disrupted.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Axial high-resolution CT at the level of the lateral semicircular canal shows a nodular attical soft tissue lesion (white arrow) with erosion of the anterior limb of the lateral semicircular canal (black arrow), highly suggestive of a cholesteatoma with erosion of the anterior limb of the lateral semicircular canal. Note the loss of delineation of the body and short process of the incus suggesting an extensive erosion (small arrow).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Coronal reformation of an axial volume spiral CT shows the attical soft-tissue lesion (white arrow) with loss of delineation of the tegmen (black arrow). Invasion into the middle cranial fossa cannot be excluded based on these images. There is also suspicion of a fistulization to the lateral semicircular canal on this coronal reformation (small arrow).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Coronal thin section T2-weighted MR image centered on the left ear reveals a nodular slightly hyperintense lesion (large arrow) under the temporal lobe with hyperintense material (small arrow) laterally, suggesting the presence of a small cholesteatoma with surrounding inflammatory tissue.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Coronal late postgadolinium T1-weighted MR image shows the cholesteatoma as a nonenhancing nodular lesion (large arrow) under the temporal lobe surrounded by enhancing inflammatory tissue (small arrow) mainly on its lateral side.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Coronal EPI-DWI shows a bilateral curvilinear hyperintensity (white arrows) under the temporal lobe, compatible with a large susceptibility artifact. No nodular hyperintensity suggestive of cholesteatoma can be seen.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Coronal single-shot TSE-DWI shows no curvilinear interface artifact but clearly demonstrates a hyperintensity under the temporal lobe, indicating that a cholesteatoma is present (white arrow).

Sequence NameOrientationTR (ms)TE (ms)Section (mm)MatrixFOV (mm)
EPI DWICoronal3000823128 × 128128 × 170
SS TSE DWICoronal20001152134 × 192220 × 220
TSE T1WICoronal/transverse450172192 × 256128 × 170
TSE T2-WICoronal3500922192 × 256128 × 170
  • Note:—EPI indicates echo-planar imaging; DWI, diffusion-weighted MR imaging; SS, single-shot; TSE, turbo spin-echo; T1WI, T1-weighted imaging; T2WI, T2-weighted imaging, TR, repetition time; TE, echo time; FOV, field of view.

  • Detailed description of imaging parameters

    Discussion

    Thin-section, high-resolution CT remains the primary imaging technique for the diagnosis and description of extension of a suspected middle ear cholesteatoma.1 In selected cases, MR imaging has an additional value for the evaluation of cholesteatoma extension and for the assessment of possible complications such as erosion of the lateral semicircular canal, invasion of the membranous labyrinth, and invasion of the middle cranial fossa through an eroded tegmen.1 Other complications, such as intracranial extension with temporal lobe abscess formation and facial nerve involvement can also be evaluated on MR imaging.1 MR imaging is extremely useful for the demonstration and delineation of a temporal lobe encephalocele in the case of a deficient tegmen.1 MR imaging is able to discriminate the nonenhancing cholesteatoma from enhancing inflammatory or granulation tissue.13 Several reports have discussed the appearance of acquired cholesteatoma on late postgadolinium T1-weighted MR images2,3 and on EPI-DWI images.1,4–8 On EPI-DWI, cholesteatomas demonstrate a hyperintensity probably based on a T2 shine-through effect.4,8 However, a major limitation of the EPI-DWI images still seems to be the important susceptibility artifact at the skull base (among other artifacts), the low resolution, and relatively thick sections,9–11 thus causing a size limit for detection on EPI-DWI of approximately 5 mm.5,7,8 Susceptibility artifacts caused by field inhomogeneities at the air-bone interface of the temporal bone can be reduced with the use of parallel imaging techniques.11,14 Other acquisition sequences that are less sensitive to susceptibility artifacts, such as multishot EPI sequences, spin-echo EPI sequences, and flash sequences, can be used.11

    Single-shot TSE-DWI uses a 180° radio-frequency refocusing pulse for each measured echo, which explains the reduction of the susceptibility artifact. It allows the use of a higher imaging matrix and thinner sections (2 mm). Our case suggests that single-shot TSE-DWI with an actual size of 2 mm is able to discriminate smaller cholesteatomas. In this particular case, because of the absence of susceptibility artifacts at the interface between temporal lobe and temporal bone, the cholesteatoma could obviously be depicted. This demonstrates the advantage of this sequence. The size of the actual cholesteatoma at surgery was 5 mm. It was surrounded by inflammatory tissue. Furthermore, the late postgadolinium T1-weighted images also succeeded in differentiating the nonenhancing cholesteatoma from the surrounding enhancing inflammatory and granulation tissue.

    Although in this case the combination of late postgadolinium T1-weighted images and single-shot TSE-DWI proved to be very convincing for the diagnosis of a primary acquired cholesteatoma, further studies on larger series are needed to prove the value of single-shot TSE-DWI in combination with late postgadolinium T1-weighted images for the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma.

    References

    1. ↵
      Lemmerling M, De Foer B. Imaging of cholesteatomatous and non-cholesteatomatous middle ear disease. In: Lemmerling M, Kollias SS, eds. Radiology of the Petrous Bone. New York: Springer-Verlag;2004 :31–47
    2. ↵
      Williams MT, Ayache D, Alberti C, et al. Detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with delayed-contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial findings. Eur Radiol 2003;13:169–74
      PubMed
    3. ↵
      Ayache D, Williams MT, Lejeune D, et al. Usefulness of delayed postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual cholesteatoma after canal wall-up tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2005;115:607–10
      PubMed
    4. ↵
      Fitzek C, Mewes T, Fitzek S, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of cholesteatomas of the petrous bone. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:636–41
      CrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      Aikele P, Kittner T, Offergeld C, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of cholesteatoma in pediatric and adult patients who have undergone middle ear surgery. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:261–65
      CrossRefPubMed
    6. Maheshwari S, Mukherji SK. Diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after mastoidectomy: case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:847–49
      Abstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      Stassola A, Magliulo G, Parrotto D, et al. Detection of postoperative relapsing/residual cholesteatoma with diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:879–84
      CrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Pouillon M, et al. The value of diffusion-weighted MR-imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study in 100 patients. Eur Radiol Mar 3,2006 (Epub).
    9. ↵
      Fisher H, Ladebeck R. Echo planar imaging image artifacts. In: Schmitt F, Stehling MK, Turner R, eds. Echo-Planar Imaging: Theory, Technique and Application. New York: Springer-Verlag;1998 :179–200
    10. Bammer R. Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur Radiol 2003;45:169–84
    11. ↵
      Hiwatashi A, Zhong J. Pitfalls and artifacts of DW imaging. In: Moritani T, Ekholm S, Westesson PL, eds. Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of the Brain. New York: Springer-Verlag;2005 :11–24
    12. ↵
      Lövblad KO, Jakob PM, Qun C, et al. Turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR of ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:201–08
      Abstract
    13. ↵
      Martin N, Sterkers O, Nahum M. Chronic inflammatory disease of the middle ear cavities: Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176:399–405
      PubMed
    14. ↵
      Van Den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK, et al. Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 2003;46:3–27
      CrossRefPubMed
    • Received December 20, 2005.
    • Accepted after revision March 1, 2006.
    • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (7)
    American Journal of Neuroradiology
    Vol. 27, Issue 7
    August 2006
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Advertisement
    Print
    Download PDF
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Single-Shot, Turbo Spin-Echo, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging versus Spin-Echo-Planar, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Acquired Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Cite this article
    B. De Foer, J.-P. Vercruysse, B. Pilet, J. Michiels, R. Vertriest, M. Pouillon, T. Somers, J.W. Casselman, E. Offeciers
    Single-Shot, Turbo Spin-Echo, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging versus Spin-Echo-Planar, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Acquired Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
    American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2006, 27 (7) 1480-1482;

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    0 Responses
    Respond to this article
    Share
    Bookmark this article
    Single-Shot, Turbo Spin-Echo, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging versus Spin-Echo-Planar, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Acquired Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
    B. De Foer, J.-P. Vercruysse, B. Pilet, J. Michiels, R. Vertriest, M. Pouillon, T. Somers, J.W. Casselman, E. Offeciers
    American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2006, 27 (7) 1480-1482;
    del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Case Report
      • Discussion
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • Responses
    • References
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar DWI for the Detection of Cholesteatomas: Correlation with Surgical Validation
    • Use of Non-Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for the Detection of Cholesteatomas in High-Risk Tympanic Retraction Pockets
    • Detection of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma by Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging: Multishot Echo-Planar Imaging Compared with Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging
    • The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Cholesteatoma Evaluation
    • Neuroradiology of Cholesteatomas
    • 3T MR Imaging of Postoperative Recurrent Middle Ear Cholesteatomas: Value of Periodically Rotated Overlapping Parallel Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging
    • MR Imaging of Orbital Inflammatory Syndrome, Orbital Cellulitis, and Orbital Lymphoid Lesions: The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar

    This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

    More in this TOC Section

    • ASL Sensitivity for Head and Neck Paraganglioma
    • Post SRS Peritumoral Hyperintense Signal of VSs
    • Contrast Enhanced Pituitary CISS/FIESTA
    Show more Head and Neck Imaging

    Similar Articles

    Advertisement

    Indexed Content

    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issues
    • Editorials
    • Editor's Choice
    • Fellows' Journal Club
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Video Articles

    Cases

    • Case Collection
    • Archive - Case of the Week
    • Archive - Case of the Month
    • Archive - Classic Case

    More from AJNR

    • Trainee Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Book Reviews

    Multimedia

    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR Scantastics

    Resources

    • Turnaround Time
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
    • Publishing Checklists
    • Author Policies
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • News and Updates

    About Us

    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
    • Alerts
    • Permissions
    • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
    • Advertise with Us
    • Librarian Resources
    • Feedback
    • Terms and Conditions
    • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

    American Society of Neuroradiology

    • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

    © 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
    Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

    Powered by HighWire