Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

OtherPediatric Neuroimaging

Enlarged Parietal Foramina: MR Imaging Features in the Fetus and Neonate

A.M. Fink and W. Maixner
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2006, 27 (6) 1379-1381;
A.M. Fink
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Maixner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: Enlarged parietal foramina are believed to be benign and familial and due to a variable degree of defective intramembranous ossification of the parietal bones. We report 2 patients with this condition in whom fetal and neonatal MR imaging studies illustrate the antenatal and perinatal evolution of this condition and the associated persistence of a falcine sinus. We discuss its relationship to the spectrum of cephalocoeles.

Enlarged symmetrical parietal or frontal foramina and cranium bifidum are believed to represent variable expression of the same genetic defect, depending on the age and phenotypic heterogeneity of the patient.1 They are remnants of arrested fetal cranial development and can be very large and midline at birth but usually close during mid-childhood, leaving only paired foramina in the parietal or frontal bones, which may persist throughout life. Because high-resolution antenatal sonography and MR imaging (MRI), as well as neonatal MRI, allow early detection of cranial and intracranial anomalies, the developmental features of this benign condition should be recognized. The MRIs of 2 infants who presented to our institution with findings compatible with enlarged parietal foramina were reviewed.

Case Reports

Case 1

An abnormal, large parietal skull defect crossing the midline was detected in the fetus on a routine 19-week obstetric sonography (Fig 1). A cyst was noted in the place of the bone defect, with the inner surface being intact dura and the outer surface being in continuity with the bone. The cyst measured 27 × 16 × 9 mm (transverse × anterior–posterior × cranio–caudal). The brain was sonographically normal. Fetal MRI was performed at 23 weeks (Fig 2, upper) to further evaluate the abnormality and the brain. At that time bilateral symmetrical defects of the calvarium were noted in the parietal bones along the midline, measuring 13 × 10 × 5 mm each and filled with CSF. The underlying brain was normal for gestation. Follow-up imaging at 36 weeks gestation (Fig 2, middle) demonstrated normal maturation of the brain, with ongoing calvarial defects, but less prominence of the associated CSF spaces. The infant was clinically normal at birth. Postnatal MRI of the brain at 1 month of age (Fig 2, lower) still demonstrated the calvarial anomalies, with the surface of the brain conforming to the contour anomaly of the overlying skull. In addition the venous drainage was shown to be anomalous, with absence of the straight sinus and a persistent falcine sinus draining into the sagittal sinus at the level of the skull defects. This venous anomaly was also evident on the 2 fetal MRI studies (black arrows).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Patient 1. Obstetric sonogram at 19 weeks gestation.

Parasagittal image of the brain shows the calvarial defect and cyst covered by dura and skin (white arrow).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Patient 1. Fetal and neonatal brain MRIs.

Upper, Fetal MRI at 23 weeks gestation (single-shot, fast spin-echo).

Middle, Fetal MRI at 36 weeks gestation (single-shot, fast spin-echo).

Lower, Neonatal MRI (fast spin-echo T2).

A, Sagittal images.

B, Axial level of the thalami (upper) and parietal bones (lower).

C, Coronal level with the posterior lateral ventricles (upper) and parietal bones (lower).

Note: White arrows, parietal foramina with calvarial defects initially filled by CSF and then brain; black arrows, course of the abnormal interhemispheric venous drainage. Note the absence of the normally positioned straight sinus.)

Case 2

A healthy female infant born at 35 weeks’ gestation presented at birth with a palpable parietal skull defect. MRI performed at 1 month of age to assess the underlying brain demonstrated similar imaging findings to patient 1 with bilateral parietal skull defects, slight herniation of the underlying brain to conform to the defects, and absence of the straight sinus with a persistent falcine sinus flowing into the sagittal sinus at the level of the anomaly (Fig 3).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Patient 2. MRI at 1 month of age (FSE T2; white arrows, parietal foramina with calvarial defects; black arrows, course of the abnormal interhemispheric venous drainage, note absence of the normally positioned straight sinus).

A, Sagittal images.

B, Axial level of the thalami (upper) and parietal bones (lower).

C, Coronal level with the posterior lateral ventricles (upper) and parietal bones (lower).

Discussion

The normal calvarium is formed by intramembranous ossification, where bone is formed directly from mesenchyme. “Cranium bifidum” and giant parietal and frontal foramina are believed to be variable expressions of a disorder of calvarial ossification. During development, a single defect initially involves the bones on either side of the midline and is subsequently divided into 2 foramina by parasagittal islands of ossification. At birth, either a large midline or bilateral skull defects are present. The underlying brain is covered by a membrane of dura and pericranium, and the overlying scalp is intact. The defects tend to close during mid-childhood, often leaving symmetrical foramina. A familial incidence with autosomal dominant inheritance is recognized and more recently specific gene mutations have been identified.1–3

There are few previous reports of brain MRI in individuals with giant parietal foramina, with imaging confined to adults and children.3,4 Although the condition is believed to be benign, cross-sectional imaging with CT and MRI has uncovered associated intracranial anomalies, in particular abnormal venous development, as seen in our patients. In a series of 7 patients (adults and children) who had undergone either CT or MRI, 6 had a persistent falcine sinus with associated hypoplasia or atresia of the straight sinus.4 In another series of 3 members of one family who underwent MRI, all also had this venous anomaly.3 A mesenchymal disturbance has been postulated as primary cause for both the bone and vascular abnormalities.3 Six of the 10 patients in these 2 series also had asymptomatic mesial occipital polymicrogyria. These are the only intracranial abnormalities reported in association with enlarged parietal foramina to date. Although the size of the calvarial defects varies between individuals and decreases with age, there is no indication that there is any relationship between their size and the associated brain anomalies.

Giant parietal foramina have been detected occasionally on antenatal sonography in the mid-trimester.5,6 As in our patient, a single ossification defect involving both parietal bones but without herniation of membranes or brain beyond the confines of the skull is described. There is no previous description of the fetal MRI findings.

Atretic parietal cephaloceles, also associated with midline skull defects, usually present as a subcutaneous midline cyst or nodule and are associated with abnormality of the overlying scalp. In parietal foramina, there is no mass and the overlying scalp is always normal. Abnormalities of venous drainage very similar to those seen with giant parietal foramina are recognized in association with atretic cephaloceles/meningoceles.7–10 The constellation of an absent or rudimentary straight sinus with an alternative venous drainage between the hemispheres that joins the sagittal sinus in a high position is believed to be due to interruption of the normal development of the venous drainage systems. The alternative venous drainage is variably believed to either represent a falcine sinus9 or the straight sinus in an embryonic position.8,10 Although the exact embryologic origin of atretic cephaloceles is uncertain,11 they probably arise from failure of closure of the neuropore during the third to fourth week of gestation. The parietal bones start to ossify around week 7–8. The straight sinus only develops from the primitive venous plexuses by week 10.9,12 Abnormal development in the parietal midline before this therefore may prevent the normal progress of venous sinus formation.

Parietal foramina associated with an atretic cephalocele4 and symmetrical parietal meningoceles12 have been documented. In both cases the abnormal venous anatomy was present.

In summary, to the best of our knowledge intracranial MRI findings in patients with giant parietal foramina have been reported in only a few children and adults and have not been described previously in the fetus and neonate. The abnormal venous drainage with persistence of a falcine sinus and atresia or hypoplasia of the straight sinus, which is present in most, can be recognized on fetal MRI. Similar venous anomalies are seen in both this condition and atretic parietal cephalocoeles, raising the possibility that enlarged parietal foramina may represent the benign end of the same developmental spectrum. Recognition of the early imaging features of this condition is important because the lesions can appear alarming ante- and perinatally. Awareness of the venous anomaly is imperative before surgical management. Follow-up imaging in childhood to screen for any other associated developmental brain anomaly, in particular occipital cortical dysplasia, may be warranted.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Amanda Sampson, from the Department of Obstetric Sonography at the Royal Women’s Hospital in Melbourne, for the antenatal sonography image.

References

  1. ↵
    Little BB, Knoll KA, Klein VR, et al. Hereditary cranium bifidum and symmetric parietal foramina are the same entity. Am J Med Genetics 1990;35:453–58
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Wuyts W, Reardon W, Preis S, et al. Identification of mutations in the MSX2 homeobox gene in families affected with foramina parietalia permagna. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9:1251–55
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Valente M, Valente KD, Sugayama SSM, et al. Malformation of cortical and vascular development in one family with parietal foramina determined by an ALX4 homeobox gene mutation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1836–39
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Reddy AT, Hedlund GL, Percy AK. Enlarged parietal foramina: association with cerebral venous and cortical anomalies. Neurology 2000;54:1175–78
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Fernandez G, Hertzberg BS. Prenatal sonographic detection of giant parietal foramina. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:155–57
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Salamanca A, Gonzalez-Gomez F, Padilla MC, et al. Prenatal sonographic appearance of foramina parietalia permagna. Prenat Diagn 1994;14:766–69
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Martinez-Lage JF, Sola J, Casas C, et al. Atretic cephalocele: the tip of the iceberg. J Neurosurg 1992;77:230–35
    PubMed
  8. ↵
    Patterson RJ, Egelhoff JC, Crone KR, et al. Atretic parietal cephaloceles revisited: an enlarging clinical and imaging spectrum? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:791–95
    Abstract
  9. ↵
    Bartels RHMA, Merx JL, van Overbeeke JJ. Falcine sinus and occipital encephalocele: a magnetic resonance venography study. J Neurosurg 1998;89:738–41
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Otsubo Y, Sato H, Sato N, et al. Cephaloceles and abnormal venous drainage. Child’s Nerv Syst 1999;15:329–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Yamazaki T, Enomoto T, Iguchi M, et al. Atretic cephalocele: report of two cases with special reference to embryology. Child’s Nerv Syst 2001;17:674–78
    PubMed
  12. ↵
    Aoyagi M, Matsushima Y, Takei H, et al. Parietal formamina complicated by meningocele. Childs Nerv Syst 1985;1:234–37
    PubMed
  • Received May 11, 2005.
  • Accepted after revision August 2, 2005.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 6
June 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enlarged Parietal Foramina: MR Imaging Features in the Fetus and Neonate
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.M. Fink, W. Maixner
Enlarged Parietal Foramina: MR Imaging Features in the Fetus and Neonate
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2006, 27 (6) 1379-1381;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Enlarged Parietal Foramina: MR Imaging Features in the Fetus and Neonate
A.M. Fink, W. Maixner
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2006, 27 (6) 1379-1381;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Reports
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • RECANALIZATION AND OBLITERATION OF FALCINE SINUS IN CEREBRAL VENOUS SINUS THROMBOSIS
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • FRACTURE MR in Congenital Vertebral Anomalies
  • Neuroimaging Delineation and Progression of SLSMD
  • fetal brain development of 10 weeks gestation
Show more PEDIATRIC NEUROIMAGING

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire