Vital Signs Investigation in Subjects Undergoing MR Imaging at 8T

References

1. ↵
   Robitaille PM, Abduljalil AM, Kangarlu A, et al. Human magnetic resonance imaging at 8T. NMR Biomed 1998;11:263–65

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. Christoforidis GA, Bourekas EC, Baujan M, et al. High resolution MRI of the deep brain vascular anatomy at 8 Tesla: susceptibility-based enhancement of the venous structures. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:857–66

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. Bourekas EC, Christoforidis GA, Abduljalil AM, et al. High resolution MRI of the deep gray nuclei at 8 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:867–74

   CrossRefPubMed
4. Niendorf T. On the application of susceptibility-weighted ultra-fast low-angle RARE experiments in functional MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:1189–98

   CrossRefPubMed
5. Chakeres DW, Abduljalil AM, Novak P, et al. Comparison of 1.5 and 8 Tesla high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of lacunar infarcts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:628–32

   CrossRefPubMed
6. Farooki S, Ashman CJ, Yu JS, et al. In vivo high-resolution MR imaging of the carpal tunnel at 8.0 Tesla. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31:445–50

   CrossRefPubMed
7. ↵
   Robitaille PM, Abduljalil AM, Kangarlu A. Ultra high resolution imaging of the human head at 8 Tesla: 2K x 2K for Y2K. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:2–8

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Schenck JF. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:2–19

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Schenck JF, Dumoulin CL, Redington RW, et al. Human exposure to 4.0-Tesla magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. Med Phys 1992;19:1089–98

   CrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    Schenck JF. Health and physiological effects of human exposure to whole-body four-Tesla magnetic fields during MRI. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992;649:285–301

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Schaefer DJ. Safety aspects of switched gradient fields. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 1998;6:731–48
12. Ham CL, Engels JM, van de Wiel GT, et al. Peripheral nerve stimulation during MRI: effects of high gradient amplitudes and switching rates. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:933–37

    PubMed
13. ↵
    Schaefer DJ, Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA. Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:20–29

    CrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    Shellock FG. Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:30–36

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Schaefer DJ. Safety aspects of radiofrequency power deposition in magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6:775–89

    PubMed
16. ↵
    High WB, Sikora J, Ugurbil K, et al. Subchronic in vivo effects of a high static magnetic field (9.4 T) in rats. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:122–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    Chakeres DW, Kangarlu A, Boudoulas H, et al. Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:346–52

    CrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    Chakeres DW, Bornstein R, Kangarlu A. Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:342–45

    CrossRefPubMed
19. ↵
    Kangarlu A, Burgess RE, Zhu H, et al. Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1407–16

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Kangarlu A, Shellock FG, Chakeres DW. 8.0-Tesla human MR system: temperature changes associated with radiofrequency-induced heating of a head phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:220–26

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Criteria for Significant Risk Investigations of Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Devices. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health;2003;1–5
22. ↵
    Abduljalil AM, Kangarlu A, Zhang X, et al. Acquisition of human multislice MR images at 8 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:335–40

    CrossRefPubMed
23. ↵
    Keltner JR, Roos MS, Brakeman PR, et al. Magnetohydrodynamics of blood flow. Magn Reson Med 1990;16:139–49

    PubMed
24. ↵
    Shellock FG. Cutaneous blood flow changes during MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:1059–60

    PubMed
25. ↵
    Shellock FG, Crues JV. Temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure changes associated with clinical MR imaging at 1.5T. Radiology 1987;163:259–62

    PubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Shellock FG, Crues JV. Temperature changes caused by MR imaging of the brain with a head coil. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;9:287–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004;232:635–52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    Shellock FG. Thermal responses in human subjects exposed to magnetic resonance imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992;649:260–72

    PubMed
29. ↵
    Shellock FG, Myers SM, Kimble KJ. Monitoring heart rate and oxygen saturation with a fiber-optic pulse oximeter during MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:663–64

    PubMed
30. ↵
    Shellock FG, Schaefer DJ, Kanal E. Physiologic responses to an MR imaging procedure performed at a specific absorption rate of 6.0 W/kg. Radiology 1994;192:865–68

    PubMedWeb of Science
31. Shellock FG, Shields CL Jr. Temperature changes associated with radiofrequency energy-induced heating of bovine capsular tissue: evaluation of bipolar RF electrodes. Arthroscopy 2000;16:348–58

    PubMedWeb of Science
32. ↵
    Shellock FG. Radiofrequency energy induced heating of bovine capsular tissue: in vitro assessment of newly developed, temperature-controlled monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency electrodes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002;10:254–59

    PubMed
33. ↵
    Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Schaefer DJ. Physiologic effects of intense MR imaging gradient fields. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 1999;9:363–77
34. ↵
    Budinger TF, Fischer H, Hentschel D, et al. Physiological effects of fast oscillating magnetic field gradients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:909–14

    PubMed
35. ↵
    United States Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for content and review of a magnetic resonance diagnostic device 510(k) application: safety parameter action levels. Center for Devices and Radiological Health Report. Rockville, MD: US FDA;1988
36. ↵
    International Electrotechnology Commission. Particular requirements for the safety of agnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis. In: Diagnostic imaging equipment, publication IEC 60601–2-33, medical electrical equipment. Part 2. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnology Commission;1995
37. ↵
    Hojgaard MV, Holstein-Rathlou NH, Agner E, et al. Reproducibility of heart rate variability, blood pressure variability and baroreceptor sensitivity during rest and head-up tilt. Blood Press Monit 2005;10:19–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. ↵
    Khoury AF, Sunderajan P, Kaplan NM. The early morning rise in blood pressure is related mainly to ambulation. Am J Hypertens 1992;5:339–44

    PubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    Kuchel PW, Coy A, Stilbs P. NMR “diffusion-diffraction” of water revealing alignment of erythrocytes in a magnetic field and their dimensions and membrane transport characteristics. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:637–43

    CrossRefPubMed