Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Morphologic Analysis of Normal Human Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion by 3D MR Imaging

J. Shen, H.-Y. Wang, J.-Y. Chen and B.-L. Liang
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2006, 27 (10) 2098-2103;
J. Shen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.-Y. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-Y. Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.-L. Liang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Determination of DRG position. The position of the DRG was determined on the original coronal FFE images. A and B are the lines respectively connecting the medial and lateral borders of the pedicles. If the midpoint of the DRG lies proximal to A, it is an intraspinal type; between A and B, a foraminal type; and distal to B, an extraforaminal type. In this 28-year-old volunteer, the L4 DRGs are the foraminal type (arrowheads). P indicates the L4 vertebral pedicles.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Lumbar DRGs on coronal MIP imaging. The reconstructed MIP image clearly depicts the DRGs of the spinal nerve bilaterally from L1 to L5, which demonstrates intermediate signal intensity (arrowheads indicate DRGs from L4 to L1; arrows indicate L5 DRGs).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Architecture of DRGs. The singular right L5 DRG (arrow) and the biganglia right L4 DRG (arrowheads) are clearly demonstrated on the MIP image with an angle of 24° rotated to the right. The dimension of the DRGs on this plane is maximal, and the interference of adjacent vessels could be removed. Whether in biganglia or singular ganglion, a high intensity rim could be noted.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Triganglia architecture of L5. The right L5 DRG, with a composition of 3 separate ganglia, is defined as the triganglia.

    A, The original FFE coronal image distinctly demonstrates the triganglia architecture of the right L5 DRG (arrowheads).

    B, The MIP coronal image also clearly shows the triganglia architecture of the right L5 DRG (arrowheads). At same time, the biganglia architecture could be found in the L4 DRGs bilaterally (arrows).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Lumbar DRGs on serial coronal MIP images. All 5 pairs of DRGs of the spinal nerves from L1 to L5 (arrowheads) are well displayed on serial views. Although some segmental and radicular vessels surrounding the DRGs are also displayed, the DRGs could be distinguished from these vessels by the rotation of the serial images with different angulations.

    A, Left antero-oblique view.

    B, Frontal view.

    C, Right antero-oblique view.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Distribution of DRGs

    Intraspinal*ForaminalExtraforaminalTotal
    L1
        Female0 (0)121 (99.2)1 (0.8)122
        Male0 (0)108 (100)0 (0)108
        Combined0 (0)229 (99.6)1 (0.4)230
    L2
        Female0 (0)121 (99.2)1 (0.8)122
        Male0 (0)107 (99.1)1 (0.9)108
        Combined0 (0)228 (99.1)2 (0.9)230
    L3
        Female0 (0)120 (98.4)2 (1.6)122
        Male0 (0)105 (97.2)3 (2.8)108
        Combined0 (0)225 (97.8)5 (2.2)230
    L4
        Female0 (0)122 (100)0 (0)122
        Male0 (0)108 (100)0 (0)108
        Combined0 (0)230 (100)0 (0)230
    L5
        Female9 (7.4)†113 (92.6)0 (0)122
        Male4 (3.7)†104 (96.3)0 (0)108
        Combined13 (5.7)217 (94.3)0230
    Total13112981150
    • Note:—Data in parentheses are percentages calculated on the basis of the total of each sex. DRG indicates dorsal root ganglion.

    • * There was statistically significant difference in the distribution of DRG position among the different levels (χ2 = 53.687, P < .0001).

    • † At level L5, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of intraspinal ganglia of DRG between women and men (Fisher exact test, P = .265).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Dimensions of DRGs

    Level of DRG
    L5L4L3L2L1
    Width (mm)
        Female6.22 ± 0.865.75 ± 0.845.25 ± 0.914.35 ± 0.883.23 ± 0.75
        Male6.60 ± 0.935.92 ± 1.035.49 ± 1.004.69 ± 0.863.55 ± 0.75
        Combined6.40 ± 0.915.83 ± 0.945.37 ± 0.964.51 ± 0.883.38 ± 0.77
        P value*0.025 (2.270)†0.331 (0.975)0.189 (1.323)0.038 (2.099)†0.026 (2.254)†
    Length (mm)
        Female11.55 ± 2.458.47 ± 1.457.05 ± 1.415.66 ± 1.034.14 ± 0.88
        Male11.61 ± 2.028.82 ± 1.527.36 ± 1.306.07 ± 1.174.58 ± 0.85
        Combined11.58 ± 2.258.64 ± 1.497.20 ± 1.365.85 ± 1.114.35 ± 0.89
        P value*0.884 (0.147)0.200 (1.288)0.222 (1.229)0.044 (2.037)†0.007 (2.749)†
    Width/Length
        Female0.28 ± 0.060.35 ± 0.050.38 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.05
        Male0.29 ± 0.050.34 ± 0.060.37 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.04
        Combined0.28 ± 0.050.34 ± 0.060.39 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.05
        P value*0.225 (1.221)0.630 (0.483)0.739 (0.334)0.565 (0.577)0.601 (0.525)
    • Note:—Data are presented as mean ± SD. DRG indicates dorsal root ganglion.

    • * t test between women and men (t values in parentheses).

    • † The width and length of the L1 and L2 DRGs, and the width of the L5 DRGs differ statistically between men and women.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Architecture of DRGs

    SingularBigangliaTrigangliaTotalP value
    L1
        Female119 (97.5)3 (2.5)0 (0)1220.058*
        Male100 (92.6)8 (7.4)0 (0)108
        Combined219 (95.2)11 (4.8)0 (0)230
    L2
        Female93 (76.3)27 (22.1)2 (1.6)1220.324 [2.254]†
        Male74 (68.5)33 (30.6)1 (0.9)108
        Combined167 (72.6)60 (26.1)3 (1.3)230
    L3
        Female66 (54.1)56 (45.9)0 (0)1220.34*
        Male61 (56.5)45 (41.7)2 (1.8)108
        Combined127 (55.2)101 (43.9)2 (0.9)230
    L4
        Female52 (42.7)68 (55.7)2 (1.6)1220.043*‡
        Male61 (56.5)47 (43.5)0 (0)108
        Combined113 (49.1)115 (50.0)2 (0.9)230
    L5
        Female101 (82.8)18 (14.8)3 (2.4)1220.453 [1.586]†
        Male95 (88.0)12 (11.1)1 (0.9)108
        Combined196 (85.2)30 (13.0)4 (1.8)230
    Total925255101150
    • Note:—Data in parentheses and bracket are percentages calculated on the basis of the total of each sex and χ2 values, respectively. DRG indicates dorsal root ganglion.

    • * Fisher exact text.

    • † Likelihood ratio test.

    • ‡ The incidence of the bi- or triganglia differs statistically between female and male patients.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Symmetry of DRGs

    Level of DRGs
    L1L2L3L4L5
    Ganglia position*NANA1.000NA1.000
    Signal intensity*0.7270.4530.2890.5000.500
    Width†0.389 (0.865)0.476 (0.716)0.259 (1.134)0.834 (0.210)0.206 (1.271)
    Length†0.641 (0.467)1.00 (0)0.298 (1.044)0.214 (1.250)0.860 (0.176)
    Width/Length†0.610 (0.512)0.339 (0.960)0.751 (0.319)0.639 (0.470)0.332 (0.974)
    Architecture*0.4530.0650.4350.8760.407
    • Note:—Data are calculated P values. DRG indicates dorsal root ganglion.

    • * McNemar test. NA, the data is not applicable for the McNemar test because only 1, 2, and 0 pair DRGs are different in the position, respectively, at L1, L2, and L4 levels.

    • † Paired t test. Data in parentheses are t values.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 10
November 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Morphologic Analysis of Normal Human Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion by 3D MR Imaging
J. Shen, H.-Y. Wang, J.-Y. Chen, B.-L. Liang
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2006, 27 (10) 2098-2103;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Measuring spinal canal size in lumbar spinal stenosis: description of method and preliminary results
  • Value of 3D MR Lumbosacral Radiculography in the Diagnosis of Symptomatic Chemical Radiculitis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Dynamic CT Myelography: Patient Positioning
  • Evaluation of SIH MR Scoring Systems in Normals
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
Show more SPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Morphologic Analysis of Normal Human Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion by 3D MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
J. Shen, H.-Y. Wang, J.-Y. Chen, B.-L. Liang
Morphologic Analysis of Normal Human Lumbar Dorsal Root Ganglion by 3D MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2006, 27 (10) 2098-2103;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.