Advantages and Pitfalls in 3T MR Brain Imaging: A Pictorial Review

References

1. ↵
   Schultz E, Felix R. [Rapid magnetic resonance tomography sequences: theoretical principles and clinical imaging characteristics]. Digitale Bilddiagn 1988;8:50–58

   PubMed
2. ↵
   de Zwart JA, Ledden PJ, van Gelderen P, et al. Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel imaging performance of a 16-channel receive-only brain coil array at 3.0 tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:22–26

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Albert MS, Cates GD, Driehuys B, et al. Biological magnetic resonance imaging using laser-polarized 129Xe. Nature 1994;370:199–201

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. Middleton H, Black RD, Saam B, et al. MR imaging with hyperpolarized 3He gas. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:271–275

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Schad LR, Bachert P, Bock M, et al. Hyperpolarized gases: a new type of MR contrast agents? Acta Radiol Suppl 1997;412:43–46

   PubMed
6. ↵
   Lin W, An H, Chen Y, et al. Practical consideration for 3T imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2003;11:615–639

   CrossRefPubMed
7. ↵
   Schick F. Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol 2005;15:946–959

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. Norris DG. High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:519–529

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:385–402

   CrossRefPubMed
10. Baudendistel KT, Heverhagen JT, Knopp MV. [Clinical MR at 3 tesla: current status.] Radiologe 2004;44:11–18

    CrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    Kim DS, Garwood M. High-field magnetic resonance techniques for brain research. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003;13:612–619

    PubMed
12. ↵
    Ross JS. The high-field-strength curmudgeon. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:168–169

    FREE Full Text
13. Shapiro MD, Magee T, Williams D, Ramnath R, Ross JS. The time for 3T clinical imaging is now. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1628–1629; author reply 1629

    FREE Full Text
14. ↵
    Pattany PM. 3T MR imaging: the pros and cons. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1455–1456

    FREE Full Text
15. ↵
    Collins CM, Liu W, Schreiber W, et al. Central brightening due to constructive interference with, without, and despite dielectric resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:192–196

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Hoult DI, Phil D. Sensitivity and power deposition in a high-field imaging experiment. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:46–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    Adriany G, Van de Moortele PF, Wiesinger F, et al. Transmit and receive transmission line arrays for 7 tesla parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:434–445

    PubMed
18. ↵
    Vaughan JT, Adriany G, Snyder CJ, et al. Efficient high-frequency body coil for high-field MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:851–859

    CrossRefPubMed
19. ↵
    Hashemi RH, Bradley WG, Lisanti CJ. MRI: the basics. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2004 :141–142
20. ↵
    Hashemi RH, Bradley WG, Lisanti CJ. MRI: the basics. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2004 :39
21. ↵
    Graf H, Schick F, Claussen CD, Seemann MD. MR visualization of the inner ear structures: comparison of 1.5 tesla and 3 tesla images. Rofo 2004;176:17–20

    PubMed
22. ↵
    Hennig J, Scheffler K. Hyperechoes. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:6–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    Paschal CB, Morris HD. K-space in the clinic. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:145–159

    CrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    Pruessmann KP. Parallel imaging at high field strength: synergies and joint potential. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:237–244

    CrossRefPubMed
25. Bammer R, Schoenberg SO. Current concepts and advances in clinical parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:129–158

    CrossRefPubMed
26. Larkman DJ, Atkinson D, Hajnal JV. Artifact reduction using parallel imaging methods. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:267–275

    CrossRefPubMed
27. Blaimer M, Breuer F, Mueller M, et al. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:223–236

    CrossRefPubMed
28. Heidemann RM, Ozsarlak O, Parizel PM, et al. A brief review of parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2323–2337

    CrossRefPubMed
29. ↵
    Heidemann RM, Griswold MA, Muller M, et al. [Feasibilities and limitations of high field parallel MRI]. Radiologe 2004;44:49–55

    CrossRefPubMed
30. ↵
    Hu X, Norris DG. Advances in high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004;6:157–184

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    Ethofer T, Mader I, Seeger U, et al. Comparison of longitudinal metabolite relaxation times in different regions of the human brain at 1.5 and 3 tesla. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1296–1301

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. Michaeli S, Garwood M, Zhu XH, et al. Proton T2 relaxation study of water, n-acetylaspartate, and creatine in human brain using Hahn and Carr-Purcell spin echoes at 4T and 7T. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:629–633

    CrossRefPubMed
33. ↵
    Wansapura JP, Holland SK, Dunn RS, Ball WS Jr. NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:531–538

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    Schmitz BL, Grön G, Brausewetter F, et al. Enhancing gray-to- white matter contrast in 3T T1 spin-echo brain scans by optimizing flip angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2000–2004

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    Mills TC, Ortendahl DA, Hylton NM, et al. Partial flip angle MR imaging. Radiology 1987;162:531–539

    PubMed
36. ↵
    Kato H, Izumiyama M, Izumiyama K, et al. Silent cerebral microbleeds on T2*-weighted MRI: correlation with stroke subtype, stroke recurrence, and leukoaraiosis. Stroke 2002;33:1536–1540

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. ↵
    Allkemper T, Tombach B, Schwindt W, et al. Acute and subacute intracerebral hemorrhages: comparison of MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: initial experience. Radiology 2004;232:874–881

    CrossRefPubMed
38. ↵
    Hennig J, Speck O, Koch MA, Weiller C. Functional magnetic resonance imaging: a review of methodological aspects and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:1–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. Chen W, Ugurbil K. High spatial resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging at very-high-magnetic field. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:63–78

    PubMed
40. Silvennoinen MJ, Clingman CS, Golay X, et al. Comparison of the dependence of blood R2 and R2* on oxygen saturation at 1.5 and 4.7 tesla. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:47–60

    CrossRefPubMed
41. ↵
    Yacoub E, Shmuel A, Pfeuffer J, et al. Imaging brain function in humans at 7 tesla. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:588–594

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    Bernstein MA, Huston J 3rd, Lin C, et al. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:955–962

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. Gaa J, Weidauer S, Requardt M, et al. Comparison of intracranial 3D-ToF-MRA with and without parallel acquisition techniques at 1.5T and 3.0T: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 2004;45:327–332

    PubMed
44. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, et al. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo 2004;176:21–26

    PubMed
45. Willinek WA, Born M, Simon B, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging–initial experience. Radiology 2003;229:913–920

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. ↵
    Campeau NG, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 tesla: initial clinical experience. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:183–204

    CrossRefPubMed
47. ↵
    Al-Kwifi O, Emery DJ, Wilman AH. Vessel contrast at three tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:181–187

    CrossRefPubMed
48. ↵
    Gibbs GF, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, et al. Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:84–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. ↵
    Gibbs GF, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, et al. 3.0-tesla MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:97–102

    CrossRefPubMed