Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Arteriovenous Fistulas at the Cervicomedullary Junction Presenting with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Six Case Reports with Special Reference to the Angiographic Pattern of Venous Drainage

Yutaka Kai, Jun-ichiro Hamada, Motohiro Morioka, Shigetoshi Yano, Takamasa Mizuno and Jun-ichi Kuratsu
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2005, 26 (8) 1949-1954;
Yutaka Kai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun-ichiro Hamada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Motohiro Morioka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigetoshi Yano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takamasa Mizuno
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun-ichi Kuratsu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cases with spinal perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas (SPAVFs) or spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) at the cervicomedullary junction are rare. We performed a retrospective, angiographic study of 6 such patients to assess whether available angiographic data were predictive of the risk for hemorrhage.

METHODS: We report 6 patients with arteriovenous fistulas at the cervicomedullary junction. All presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Angiography demonstrated that 4 of the 6 fistulas were SDAVFs fed by the meningeal branch of the vertebral artery; the other 2 were SPAVFs fed by the anterior spinal artery. Drainage was via the perimedullary vein of the cervicomedullary junction.

RESULTS: An ascending venous route into the intracranial sinus was recognized in all 6 cases; in 3 the draining system contained varices. In 2 cases, the venous route was on the ventral side of the brain stem with drainage into the cavernous sinus. In 4 cases, the venous route was lateral at the brain stem with drainage into the inferior petrosal sinus.

CONCLUSION: SPAVFs and SDAVFs at the cervicomedullary junction that manifest an ascending venous route into the intracranial sinus present an increased risk for SAH.

Arteriovenous fistulas in spinal regions are recognized as spinal perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas (SPAVFs) and spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs). SPAVF shunts are located on the surface of the spinal cord; they are found most frequently in the conus medullaris region. SDAVFs are located in the dura matter of the nerve sleeve; they are often found in the thoracolumbar region. Patients with SPAVFs or SDAVFs usually present with gradual worsening of symptoms such as pain and weakness of the legs (1, 2). Cases with SPAVFs or SDAVFs at the cervicomedullary junction are rare; several of them presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Because there is little documentation regarding the drainage patterns of these fistulas, we performed a retrospective, angiographic study of six such patients to assess whether available angiographic data were predictive of the risk for hemorrhage or ischemic attack.

Patients and Methods

Since 1990, we have treated 113 patients with symptomatic arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) or dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). In 6 patients, the fistulas were located at the cervicomedullary junction; 4 were SDAVFs and the other 2 were SPAVFs. All 6 of these patients—5 men and 1 woman, ranging in age from 54 to 75 years—suffered associated SAHs.

Clinical data on the 6 subjects of this study are presented in Table 1. The treatment outcome was assessed at a mean of 6 months after surgery. All 6 patients underwent selective angiograms of the internal, external, vertebral, and thyrocervical arteries to document the location of the fistulas. To obtain detailed information on the location of the fistulas, their arterial supply, and venous drainage pattern, we performed continuous-mode angiography (20 frames/s). In efforts to identify factors that may have placed these patients at increased risk for SAH, we retrospectively evaluated their clinical characteristics and angiographic findings.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1:

Summary of the six cases with arteriovenous fistulas at the cervicomedullary junction

Table 2 provides a summary of 41 previously reported patients with SPAVFs or SDAVFs in the cervicomedullary junction. We paid special attention to the reported venous drainage routes in these cases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2:

Summary of reported patients with arteriovenous fistula of cervicomedullary junction

Results

Angiography demonstrated that in 4 patients with SDAVFs (cases 1–4), the fistula was fed by the meningeal branch of the vertebral artery or ascending pharyngeal artery. The other 2 patients (cases 5 and 6) had SPAVFs that were fed by the anterior spinal artery. Drainage was via the perimedullary vein of the cervicomedullary junction. All 6 patients manifested an ascending venous drainage route into the intracranial venous system; in 3 cases the draining system contained varices. In cases 1 and 2, the ascending drainage route involved the anteromedial medullary and anterior spinal vein and the superior petrosal sinus, with final drainage into the cavernous sinus. In the other 4 cases, the anterior spinal, anterior hemispheric, lateral hemispheric, lateral medullary, pontomedullary, and inferior petrosal vein were involved in final drainage into the inferior petrosal sinus. In cases 3–6, the ascending route was located on the ventral and lateral side of the brain stem. The point of the fistula in the 4 SDAVF cases was located on the lateral side of the foramen magnum; in the 2 SPAVF cases it was located between the foramen magnum and the C1 portion in front of the anterior surface of the upper cervical cord.

All 6 patients underwent direct surgery via the posterior transcondylar fossa approach because it makes possible the identification of abnormal vessels in front of the medulla oblongata and vertebral artery at the cervicomedullary junction. Before surgical coagulation, intraoperative angiograms were obtained. These proved useful after temporary clipping of the feeding artery (SPAVF cases) or the draining vessel (SDAVF cases). In SPAVF cases with abnormal vessels, the feeding artery was coagulated at a site just proximal to the fistula point. The fistula point was located at the site where the caliber of the vessel changed. In SDAVF cases, the draining vein was coagulated at a site just distal to the exit zone from the dura mater. In all 6 patients, postoperative angiographs revealed the complete disappearance of the SPAVF or SDAVF. The treatment outcome at 6 months after surgery was good in 5 patients; the other patient remained moderately disabled because of initial damage of the medulla oblongata.

Illustrative Cases

Case 1

This 61-year-old man experienced the sudden onset of severe headache. On admission, CT showed SAH involving mainly the posterior fossa. Angiography of the left vertebral artery demonstrated an abnormal vessel at the cervicomedullary junction. The feeding arteries were the dural branches of the left vertebral artery. Drainage was via the anteromedial medullary veins into the superior petrosal sinus and finally the cavernous sinus in the intracranial space. There were no varices in the drainage route (Figs 1 and 2). Direct surgery by using the left transcondylar fossa approach exposed dural penetration by the left vertebral artery and a dilated anterior spinal vein in front of the medulla oblongata. Because the fistula point was located at the site where the left vertebral artery penetrated the dura, a diagnosis of SDAVF was made. After coagulation of the feeding arteries at the dura mater, the color of the draining veins changed from red to dark blue. Finally, the draining veins were coagulated at a site distal to the fistula. Angiography of the left vertebral artery, performed in the operating room immediately following the procedure, showed disappearance of the abnormal vessels.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Left vertebral angiogram (early phase), showing abnormal vessels at the cervicomedullary junction. The feeding artery is the meningeal branch of the vertebral artery and ascending drainage route was recognized (arrowhead).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Left vertebral angiogram (late phase), showing shunt flow draining retrogradely into the left superior petrosal sinus (arrowhead).

His postoperative course was uneventful. Angiograms after treatment confirmed the disappearance of the SDAVF (Fig. 3). This patient suffered no neurologic deficits and was able to resume his normal life.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Postoperative left vertebral angiogram, demonstrating complete disappearance of the abnormal vessels.

Case 5

This 54-year-old man experienced the sudden onset of severe headache. On admission, CT showed SAH. Angiography of the left vertebral artery demonstrated an abnormal vessel at the cervicomedullary junction. The feeding artery was the anterior spinal artery. Drainage was via the lateral medullary veins into the inferior petrosal veins in the intracranial space and finally into the inferior petrosal sinus. The caliber of the feeding artery changed at the fistula point. The drainage route contained no varices (Figs 4 and 5). Direct surgery was performed via the left transcondylar fossa approach. The feeding anterior spinal artery was located in front of the medulla oblongata. Because it fed into the anterior spinal vein, a diagnosis of SPAVF was made. Upon temporary clipping of the anterior spinal artery, the color of the anterior spinal vein changed from red to blue. Because intraoperative angiography, performed with the clip in place, showed disappearance of the SPAVF, the anterior spinal artery was clipped at a site just proximal to the fistula.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Left vertebral angiogram (early phase), showing abnormal vessels at the cervicomedullary junction. The feeder, the anterior spinal artery, feeds directly into the lateral medullary vein (arrow).

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Left vertebral angiogram (late phase), showing shunt flow draining retrogradely into the bilateral inferior petrosal vein (arrowhead).

His postoperative course was uneventful, and angiography after his surgical treatment revealed disappearance of the SPAVF (Fig 6). He suffered no neurologic deficits and was able to resume his normal life.

Fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6.

Postoperative left vertebral angiogram, demonstrating complete disappearance of the abnormal vessels.

Discussion

Arteriovenous fistulas in spinal regions are recognized as SPAVFs and as SDAVFs. In cases with SPAVFs, the shunt is located on the surface of the spinal cord; these fistulas are located in the conus medullaris region. SDAVFs are located in the dura mater of the nerve sleeve; they occur in the thoracolumbar region. Patients with SPAVFs and SDAVFs usually experience the gradual worsening of symptoms, such as pain and weakness of the legs; hemorrhagic onset is rare (1–3). Berenstein and Lasjaunias (4) reviewed 172 patients with SDAVF located in the thoracic-, lumbar-, or sacral area; none of these patients suffered SAH. Myelopathy remains the predominant presenting symptom. On the other hand, 10 of 41 previously reported patients with SDAVFs (5–29) or SPAVFs (30–33) at the cervicomedullary junction suffered SAHs. If we include our 6 patients, the incidence of SAH in these patients is 34% (Table 2), which suggests that the location of these fistulas at the cervicomedullary junction plays a role.

We carefully re-examined angiographic findings on 6 patients with SPAVF and SDAVF at the cervicomedullary junction. All 6 experienced SAH, and in all 6 the venous route displayed the angiographic characteristic of an ascending drainage route into the intracranial sinus system. We recognized 2 types of venous routes. In the first, the route involved the ventral side of the brain stem with final feeding into the cavernous sinus. The second type consisted of a lateral venous route with final feeding into the inferior petrosal sinus. Both types of routes involved final drainage into the intracranial sinus via an ascending drainage route.

In the 41 previously reported cases of SDAVF and SPAVF at the cervical or cervicomedullary junction, venous drainage was via an ascending route in 11, both an ascending and descending route in 3, and a descending route in 25 (Table 2). In the 2 remaining cases, the drainage route was undetected. It is worth noting that all patients with SAHs manifested the ascending route of venous drainage. In 7 cases, the ascending route finally drained into the intracranial sinus. If we include ours, there were 16 patients with SDAVF at the cervicomedullary junction who suffered SAHs; in 13 (81.2%) the drainage route was ascending with final drainage into the intracranial sinus.

We have elsewhere provided angiographic evidence of the existence of 2 types of retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage (RLVDs) in intracranial DAVFs (34, 35). In type 1, RLVD is into more than one venous sinus and in type 2, RLVD is into a single venous sinus. Patients with type 1 RLVD experienced hemorrhagic episodes at a high rate, whereas no patients with type 2 RLVD suffered hemorrhage. Angiographically, type 1 patients manifested one or more varices in the RLVD route; type 2 patients had no varices. We speculate that, in type 1 patients, a precipitous increase in retrograde venous flow immediately brought about an increase in hemodynamic stress, varix formation, and the development of hemorrhage or neurologic deficits. Our earlier histopathologic study (36) showed that, in type 1 patients, the thickness of the vessel wall was extremely irregular, which suggests that these vessels are at increased risk for developing varices in the RLVD route and for hemorrhagic episodes. On the other hand, in type 2 RLVDs, the volume of retrograde venous drainage is low because of the absence of an accessory route. Therefore, retrograde venous flow does not increase markedly and venous perfusion becomes impaired slowly over a longer period without bleeding. Pathologically, the entire media was thickened and there was prominent local intimal thickening in these patients (36). This may render them less vulnerable to the development of varices and hemorrhagic episodes.

We suspected that the venous drainage pattern in patients with SDAVF and SPAVF at the cervicomedullary junction played a role in their vulnerability for hemorrhage. Therefore, we examined their retrograde venous drainage (RVD) patterns closely and found that there were 2 types of RVD. In type 1, drainage is via an ascending route into the intracranial region with final drainage into the petrosal or cavernous sinus. This pattern is similar to the type 1 RLVD we reported earlier (36). We postulate that, as in type 1 RLVD, the drainage volume is increased in type 1 RVD, rendering these patients with SDAVF or SPAVF at the cervicomedullary junction vulnerable to bleeding. In patients with SDAVFs or SPAVFs that drained via a descending route, RVD did not drain into the intracranial sinus. This draining pattern resembles type 2 RLVD. These patients experienced no hemorrhagic events, because the draining volume was not high (16, 20). In patients with SDAVFs or SPAVFs at the thoracolumbar region there was no RVD into the intracranial sinus and these patients also did not experience hemorrhagic onset (4).

Cognard et al (37) described the correlation between the symptoms and various angiographic patterns in patients with intracranial DAVF. Type V, featuring descending spinal venous drainage, produced progressive myelopathy in 6 of 12 cases. On the other hand, in 5 of 12 patients with hemorrhage there was no descending spinal venous drainage. Kinouchi et al (14) described the connecting pathway between the pontomesencephalic venous system and both the anterior and posterior veins of the spinal cord in DAVF at the cervicomedullary junction. Angiographic studies on patients with only myelopathy showed that the shunt drained inferiorly into a single enlarged spinal medullary vein and that venous flow was slow. On the other hand, in patients with SAH, venous drainage was mainly superiorly into the intracranial sinus, and the venous flow was fast. In addition, some of their patients with SAH manifested varices on the draining vein. Intracranial drainage is associated with relatively fast venous flow and increased hemodynamic stress may lead to the formation of varices on the draining vessels and result in SAH.

We postulate that the anatomic location of SPAVF and SDAVF and their drainage patterns play an important role in placing patients at risk for hemorrhage. Our study showed that, among patients with SPAVF or SDAVF at the cervicomedullary junction, those with an ascending drainage route are at particularly high risk for SAH.

Conclusion

SPAVFs and SDAVFs at the cervicomedullary junction tended to present with hemorrhagic onset. On the other hand, patients with SPAVFs or SDAVFs in the thoracolumbar region usually experienced gradual neurologic worsening. We postulate that the anatomic location of SPAVF and SDAVF and their drainage patterns play an important role in placing patients at risk for hemorrhage and that patients with SPAVFs or SDAVFs at the cervicomedullary junction that manifest an ascending drainage route are at particularly high risk for SAHs.

References

  1. ↵
    Jellema K, Tijssen CC, van Rooij WJ, et al. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: long-term follow-up of 44 treated patients. Neurology 2004;62:1839–1841
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Koch C, Gottschalk S, Giese A. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the lumbar spine presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage: case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;100:385–391
  3. ↵
    Brunereau L, Gobin YP, Meder JF, et al. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with spinal venous drainage: relation between clinical presentation and angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1549–1554
    Abstract
  4. ↵
    Berenstein A, Lasjaunias P. Surgical neuroangiography. 5. Endovascular treatment of spine and spinal cord lesions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;1992 :5–24
  5. ↵
    Asakawa H, Yanaka K, Fujita K, et al. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula showing diffuse MR enhancement of the spinal cord: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2002;58:251–257
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. Do HM, Jensen ME, Cloft HJ, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the cervical spine presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:348–350
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. Ernst RJ, Gaskill-Shipley M, Tomsick TA, et al. Cervical myelopathy associated with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula: MR findings before and after treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1330–1334
    Abstract
  8. Fox AJ, Allcock JM. Successful embolization of a fistula between the ascending pharyngeal artery and internal jugular vein. Neuroradiology 1978;15:149–152
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. Gaensler EH, Jackson DE Jr, Halbach VV. Arteriovenous fistulas of the cervicomedullary junction as a cause of myelopathy: radiographic findings in two cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:518–521
    FREE Full Text
  10. Guglielmi G, Guidetti G, Mori S, Silipo P. Therapeutic embolization of an ascending pharyngeal artery-internal jugular vein fistula: case report. J Neurosurg 1988;69:132–133
    PubMed
  11. Hahnel S, Jansen O, Geletneky K. MR appearance of an intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula leading to cervical myelopathy. Neurology 1998;51:1131–1135
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. Hashimoto H, Iida J, Shin Y, Hironaka Y, Sakaki T. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with perimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 2000;7:64–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. Inci S, Bertan V, Cila A. Angiographically occult epidural arteriovenous fistula of the craniocervical junction. Surg Neurol 2002;57:167–173
    PubMed
  14. ↵
    Kinouchi H, Mizoi K, Takahashi A, et al. Dural arteriovenous shunts at the craniocervical junction. J Neurosurg 1998;89:755–761
    PubMed
  15. Koenig E, Thron A, Schrader V, Dichgans J. Spinal arteriovenous malformations and fistulae: clinical, neuroradiological and neurophysiological findings. J Neurol 1989;236:260–266
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Mascalchi M, Scazzeri F, Prosetti D, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction with perimedullary venous drainage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1137–1141
    Abstract
  17. Miyoshi Y, Taniwaki T, Arakawa K, et al. A case of cervical myelopathy due to dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction [in Japanese]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1999;39:836–841
    PubMed
  18. Niwa J, Matsumura S, Maeda Y, Ohoyama H. Transcondylar approach for dural arteriovenous fistulas of the cervicomedullary junction. Surg Neurol 1997;48:627–631
    PubMed
  19. Oda Y, Konishi T, Suzui H, et al. Partially thrombosed radiculomeningeal arterio-venous fistula in spinomedullary junction [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1989;17:63–68
    PubMed
  20. ↵
    Oishi H, Okuda O, Arai H, et al. Successful surgical treatment of a dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction with reference to pre- and postoperative MRI. Neuroradiology 1999;41:463–467
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. Partington MD, Rufenacht DA, Marsh WR, Piepgras DG. Cranial and sacral dural arteriovenous fistulas as a cause of myelopathy. J Neurosurg 1992;76:615–622
    PubMed
  22. Pulido Rivas P, Villoria Medina F, Fortea Gil F, Sola RG. Dural fistula in the craniocervical junction: a case report and review of the literature. Rev Neurol 2004;38:438–442
    PubMed
  23. Rodesch G, Lasjaunias P. Spinal cord arteriovenous shunts: from imaging to management. Eur J Radiol 2003;46:221–232
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. Slaba S, Smayra T, Hage P, et al. An unusual cause of acute myelopathy: a dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction. J Med Liban 2000;48:168–172
    PubMed
  25. Symon L, Kuyama H, Kendall B. Dural arteriovenous malformations of the spine: clinical features and surgical results in 55 cases. J Neurosurg 1984;60:238–247
    PubMed
  26. Trop I, Roy D, Raymond J, et al. Craniocervical dural fistula associated with cervical myelopathy: angiographic demonstration of normal venous drainage of the thoracolumbar cord does not rule out diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:583–586
    Abstract
  27. Vinuela F, Fox AJ, Pelz DM, Drake CG. Unusual clinical manifestations of dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;64:554–558
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. Willinsky R, Lasjaunias P, Terbrugge K, Hurth M. Angiography in the investigation of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: a protocol with application of the venous phase. Neuroradiology 1990;32:114–116
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Yoshida S, Oda Y, Kawakami Y, Sato S. Progressive myelopathy caused by dural arteriovenous fistula at the craniocervical junction: case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1999;39:376–379
    PubMed
  30. ↵
    Bayrakci B, Aysun S, Firat M. Arteriovenous fistula: a cause of torticollis. Pediatr Neurol 1999;20:146–147
    PubMed
  31. Heros RC, Debrun GM, Ojemann RG, et al. Direct spinal arteriovenous fistula: a new type of spinal AVM: case report. J Neurosurg 1986;64:134–139
    PubMed
  32. Hida K, Iwasaki Y, Ushikoshi S, et al. Corpectomy: a direct approach to perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas of the anterior cervical spinal cord. J Neurosurg 2002;96:157–161
  33. ↵
    Nagashima C, Miyoshi A, Nagashima R, et al. Spinal giant intradural perimedullary arteriovenous fistula: clinical and neuroradiological study in one case with review of literature. Surg Neurol 1996;45:524–531
    PubMed
  34. ↵
    Kai Y, Hamada J, Morioka M, et al. Correlation between magnetic resonance images and draining patterns in dural arteriovenous fistulas with leptomeningeal venous drainage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000;142:413–418
    PubMed
  35. ↵
    Kai Y, Hamada J, Morioka M, et al. Pre- and post-treatment MR imaging and single photon emission CT in patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas and retrograde leptomeningeal venous drainage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:619–625
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Hamada J, Yano S, Kai Y, et al. Histopathological study of venous aneurysms in patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 2000;92:1023–1027
    PubMed
  37. ↵
    Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 1995;194:671–680
    PubMed
  • Received December 12, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision March 2, 2005.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 8
1 Sep 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Arteriovenous Fistulas at the Cervicomedullary Junction Presenting with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Six Case Reports with Special Reference to the Angiographic Pattern of Venous Drainage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Yutaka Kai, Jun-ichiro Hamada, Motohiro Morioka, Shigetoshi Yano, Takamasa Mizuno, Jun-ichi Kuratsu
Arteriovenous Fistulas at the Cervicomedullary Junction Presenting with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Six Case Reports with Special Reference to the Angiographic Pattern of Venous Drainage
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2005, 26 (8) 1949-1954;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Arteriovenous Fistulas at the Cervicomedullary Junction Presenting with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Six Case Reports with Special Reference to the Angiographic Pattern of Venous Drainage
Yutaka Kai, Jun-ichiro Hamada, Motohiro Morioka, Shigetoshi Yano, Takamasa Mizuno, Jun-ichi Kuratsu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2005, 26 (8) 1949-1954;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Arteriovenous shunts of the cervical spine: patient demographics, presentation, patterns of high-risk venous drainage, and updated classification
  • Clinical features, treatment strategies and outcomes of craniocervical junction arteriovenous fistulas: a cohort study of 193 patients
  • Clinical features, treatment strategies and outcomes of craniocervical junction arteriovenous fistulas: a cohort study of 193 patients
  • Dural arteriovenous fistulas at the craniocervical junction: a systematic review
  • Analysis of venous drainage in three patients with extradural spinal arteriovenous fistulae at the craniovertebral junction with potentially benign implication
  • Endovascular management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas
  • Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas
  • Dural Arteriovenous Shunts: A New Classification of Craniospinal Epidural Venous Anatomical Bases and Clinical Correlations
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Effect of SARS-CoV2 on Endovascular Thrombectomy
  • A Key Factor Shapes LS-DAVFs EVT Outcome
  • MT in Mild LVO Stroke: ASSIST Registry Insights
Show more Neurointervention

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire