3D Cerebral Angiography: Radiation Dose Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography

References

1. ↵
   Klucznik RP. Current technology and clinical applications of three-dimensional angiography. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:711–728

   CrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   Abe T, Hirohata M, Tanaka N, et al. Clinical benefits of rotational 3D angiography in endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:686–688

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. Albuquerque FC, Spetzler RF, Zabramski JM, et al. Effects of three-dimensional angiography on the coiling of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2002;51:597–605

   CrossRefPubMed
4. Anxionnat R, Bracard S, Ducrocq X, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment. Radiology 2001;3:799–808
5. Castano-Duque CH, Ruscalleda-Nadal J, De Juan-Delago M, et al. Early experience studying cerebral aneurysms with rotational and three-dimensional angiography and review of CT and MR angiography literature. Interv Neuroradiol 2002;8:377–391
6. Hochmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M. Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1199–1205

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. Missler U, Hundt C, Wiesmann M. Three dimensional reconstructed rotational DSA in planning treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Eur Radiol 2000;10:564–568

   CrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nadashima K, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1545–1552

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   Gkanatsios NA, Huda W, Peters KR. Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 2002;29:717–723

   CrossRefPubMed
10. Kemerik GJ, Frantzen MJ, Oei K, et al. Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 2002;44:522–528

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. O’Dea TJ, Geise RA, Ritenour ER. The potential for radiation induced skin damage in interventional neuroradiological procedures: a review of 522 cases using automated dosimetry. Med Phys 1999;26:2027–2033

    CrossRefPubMed
12. Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. Part I. Overall measures of dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:711–727

    PubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. Part II. Skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:977–990

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    US Food and Drug Administration. FDA advisory: avoidance of serious X-ray induced skin injuries during fluoroscopically-guided procedures, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. September 30,1994
15. ↵
    International Commission on Radiological Protection. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP publication 85. Ann ICRP 2000;30:7–67
16. ↵
    De Sousa MC, Aubert B, Ricard M. Evaluation of physical performance of a scintillation dosemeter for patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 2000;73:1297–1305

    Abstract
17. ↵
    Wagner LK, Pollock JJ. Real-time portal monitoring to estimate dose to skin of patients from high dose fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 1999;72:846–855

    Abstract
18. ↵
    International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment. Part 2–43. Particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for interventional procedures. IEC 60601–2-43. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission,2000
19. ↵
    Hirai T, Korogi Y, Suginohara K, et al. Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1067–1074

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    Wagner LK, Archer BR, Cohen AM. Management of patient skin dose in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:25–33

    PubMedWeb of Science