Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

OtherSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Diffusion Tractography of the Cervical Spinal Cord by Using Parallel Imaging

Kazuhiro Tsuchiya, Akira Fujikawa and Yuriko Suzuki
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2005, 26 (2) 398-400;
Kazuhiro Tsuchiya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akira Fujikawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuriko Suzuki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: We applied a single-shot echo-planar axial diffusion tensor sequence with parallel imaging for tractography of the cervical cord. Placing a large region of interest on a reconstructed sagittal image, the cervical cord was depicted as a tract bundle showing color-encoded cephalocaudally. By setting one region of interest in the cerebral peduncle and another in the entire cord on source images, tracts on each side were visualized. This method is promising for tractography of the cervical cord.

The parallel imaging technique uses arrays of multiple receiver coils to reduce imaging time by a factor equal to the number of coils used. By shortening the echo train length, we can obtain diffusion-weighted (DW) images less affected by susceptibility artifacts when parallel imaging is employed. Our purpose was to examine the feasibility of diffusion-tensor (DT) imaging by using the parallel imaging technique for tractography of the cervical cord.

Description of the Technique

We studied seven volunteers (five men and two women with an age range of 21–37 years and a mean age of 31.7 years) and 12 patients (seven men and five women; age range, 21–90 years; mean age, 46.7 years) between November 2003 and March 2004. The patients were prospectively included in this study after they provided written consent at the time of routine MR imaging of the cervical spine. The clinical diagnosis of the patients based on clinical and MR findings included degenerative spinal canal stenosis (10 patients) and disk herniation (two patients).

Images were obtained with a whole-body 1.5-T MR imaging system with a maximum gradient capability of 30 mT/m and a slew rate of 150 mT/m/ms by using a synergy head-neck receiver coil that had three channels (head, anterior neck, and posterior neck parts). A single-shot echo-planar sequence was used to acquire DW images. The fat signal was suppressed by using the spectral selective presaturation with the inversion recovery technique. The parallel imaging technique was used (reduction factor, 1.8) to reduce distortion inherent in the echo-planar imaging technique. A motion-probing gradient was applied in six directions (Dxx, Dyy, Dzz, Dxy, Dyz, and Dxz), and a b value of 1000 s/mm2 was used for each of these six directions. Other imaging parameters are shown in the Table. Imaging time was 4 minutes 50 seconds.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Scan parameters used for tractography

For postprocessing, we used a tractography program incorporated in research software provided by the manufacturer (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). On a reconstructed sagittal DW image, we drew an automatic 3D region of interest in the 19 subjects. This 3D region of interest was created by one click on a desired location, and an algorithm of a flood-fill type was used to check whether neighboring voxels in 3D should belong to the region of interest according to a threshold set by a user. It made it possible to generate a tractogram of the entire cervical cord. For the purpose of depicting tracts on each side, in the latter consecutive 10 of the 19 subjects we included the brain stem in the imaging area and set two regions of interest, one in the right or left cerebral peduncle and the other in an entire part of the cord on reconstructed DW images in the axial plane. The threshold of fractional anisotropy, which represents the directionality of water diffusion, to generate a tractogram was usually set at 0.2–0.3 as was similarly selected by Melhem et al (1) in fiber tracking of the brain.

Two radiologists (K.T., A.F.) reviewed the images obtained. They paid attention to how the cord was demonstrated in the one region of interest method and how the white matter tracts on each side were depicted in the two region of interest method.

Results

In our color-coded tractograms, fibers running in the cephalocaudal direction were shown in blue, those in the anteroposterior direction in green, and those in the right-left direction in red. In the one region of interest method, the cervical cord was depicted as a bundle of tracts showing mainly blue that was encoded in the cephalocaudal direction in all of the 19 subjects (Fig 1). More upper and lower parts of the cord, not included in the original region of interest, were demonstrated. Although the nerve roots were demonstrated variably in each subject, those of the lower cervical cord were better depicted in 15 of the 19 subjects (2). In the two region of interest method, tracts possibly representing the corticospinal or spinothalamic tracts were visualized. Fused tractograms of the two sides demonstrated the portion of the medullary decussation in all of the ten subjects (Fig 2). The tracts from two sides of the brain did not completely cross, however, but rather seemed to combine or go down on the same side within the cervical cord in each subject. It is interesting that there was asymmetry in the number of tracts on the two sides in all of the 10 patients in whom the two region of interest method was applied. More tracts connected to the left cerebral hemisphere were demonstrated in six subjects, whereas those connected to the right hemisphere were more visualized in four subjects. On interview after MR imaging study, all of the 10 subjects stated that they were right-handed. Image distortion was judged to be acceptable on both kinds of tractography.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Tractography by the one region-of-interest method.

A, Fractional anisotropy map reconstructed in the sagittal plane shows a single region of interest displayed in white to generate a tractogram of the entire cervical cord.

B, Corresponding tractogram viewed from the front shows the cervical cord mainly composed of tracts running in the cephalocaudal direction represented in blue.

C, Corresponding tractogram viewed from the back shows some dorsal nerve roots.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Tractography by the two region-of-interest method.

A, One of source images shows a region of interest) in the left cerebral peduncle (arrow).

B, Another source image in the lower cervical level shows a region of interest encompassing the entire cord (arrow).

C, Combined image of the tracts passing the cerebral peduncles on each side shows the medullary decussation (arrow). Tracts coming through the right cerebral peduncle are shown in light yellow and those coming through the left cerebral peduncle are shown in light blue. Below the medullary decussation, the tracts from each side seem to be mixed.

Discussion

Several groups have successfully performed DT imaging of the cervical spinal cord. Quantitative analysis of some anisotropy parameters of the rat cervical cord has been reported in vitro or in vivo by using an experimental imager operating at up to 14T (2–8). In the human cervical cord, DT imaging at 1.5T has been accomplished by use of cardiac-gated and navigated and multi-shot echo-planar techniques (9, 10). A recent study performed DT imaging by using parallel imaging that is similar to ours and calculated the fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity (11). These human studies were limited to measurement of anisotropy parameters like the rat studies.

As in the brain, the clinical value of DT tractography of the spinal cord is anticipated. There are already preliminary reports describing tractography of the cervical cord by using line scan (12) or single-shot echo-planar imaging (13). In contradistinction to these reports, our technique could always generate tractograms of the entire cervical cord. In each case, the cervical cord appeared as a bundle of tracts giving a color that indicated anisotropy in the cephalocaudal direction. In this regard, we attribute our results to reduction in image distortion and susceptibility artifacts—despite use of single-shot echo-planar imaging—by using parallel imaging, which shortens the echo train length. The use of single-shot echo-planar imaging was presumably effective in providing images less affected by respiratory and cardiac motion. Meanwhile, the nerve roots were not sufficiently demonstrated on tractograms generated by both one region of interest and two region of interest methods. We believe that the limited spatial resolution was the main reason why our methods failed to demonstrate the nerve roots well.

We assume that the limited spatial resolution also made it difficult to identify in what part of the cord the tracts demonstrated by the two region of interest method were running. On the basis of the position of the upper region of interest, our tractograms by the two region of interest technique possibly visualized in a mixed manner descending tracts that include the lateral and ventral corticospinal tracts, the rubospinal tract, as well as ascending tracts that include the dorsal, lateral, and ventral spinocerebellar tracts and dorsal and ventral spinothalamic tracts. In any case, our two region of interest method could visualize fine nerve tracts by using a commercially available coil system. We consider that DT imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging, in combination with the parallel imaging technique, was also effective in this regard. In contrast to the use of a b value of 700 s/mm2 in previous studies of preliminary tractography of the cervical cord (12, 13), we employed that of 1000 s/mm2 that is widely used in DT imaging of the brain. In our experience, in three of the seven volunteers whose tractograms of b values of 500 and 1000 s/mm2 were compared, those of 1000 s/mm2 were better in demonstrating tracts.

Although at first we supposed that, below the medullary decussation, tracts passing each side of the cerebral peduncle would cross to the other side, most tracts on the two sides were mixed or went down on the same side. This is probably owing to the present DT imaging software that depicts crossing fibers as they are connected because tracts are essentially visualized by means of the largest eigenvalue. Further developments would solve this problem and demonstrate crossing of tracts at the medullary decussation correctly. It is interesting to note that there was asymmetry in the number of tracts on the two sides in the two region of interest method. At present, we are unaware of the exact reason. As this study included a small number of subjects, we are planning to examine whether this finding is true and clarify the reason in a larger series. Another limitation of our technique was the threshold of fractional anisotropy. Although we followed a previous brain fiber tracking method in this regard, application in a more quantitative way may be effective to track fine white matter fibers in the spinal cord.

Conclusion

DT imaging using parallel imaging is a promising method to perform tractography of the cervical spinal cord. We would like to emphasize that our technique can be performed in a routine clinical examination because the imaging time is acceptable. Although some issues remain to be solved or clarified, DT tractography facilitated by the parallel imaging cord may improve evaluation of the normal and affected anatomical structures of the cervical cord.

References

  1. ↵
    Melhem ER, Mori S, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain and white matter tractography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:3–16
    PubMed
  2. ↵
    Matsuzawa H, Kwee IL, Nakada T. Magnetic resonance axonography of the rat spinal cord: postmortem effects. J Neurosurg 1995;83:1023–1028
    PubMed
  3. Inglis BA, Yang L, Wirth ED 3rd, et al. Diffusion anisotropy in excised normal rat spinal cord measured by NMR microscopy. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:441–450
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. Fenyes DA, Narayana PA. In vivo echo-planar imaging of rat spinal cord. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:1249–1255
    PubMed
  5. Fenyes DA, Narayana PA. In vivo diffusion characteristics of rat spinal cord. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:717–722
    PubMed
  6. Inglis BA, Neubauer D, Yang L, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging and comparative histology of glioma engrafted in the rat spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:713–716
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. Fenyes DA, Narayana PA. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of rat spinal cord with echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:300–306
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Elshafiey I, Bilgen M, He R, Narayana PA. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of rat spinal cord at 7 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:243–247
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Clark CA, Werring DJ, Miller DH. Diffusion imaging of the spinal cord in vivo: estimation of the principal diffusivities and application to multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:133–138
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Ries M, Jones RA, Dousset V, Moonen CT. Diffusion tensor MRI of the spinal cord. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:884–892
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Cercignani M, Horsfield MA, Agosta F, Filippi M. Sensitivity-encoded diffusion tensor MR imaging of the cervical cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1254–1256
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Murphy BP, Zientara GP, Huppi PS, et al. Line scan diffusion tensor MRI of the cervical spinal cord in preterm infants. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:949–953
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Hickman SJ, Parker GJ, et al. Investigating cervical spinal cord structure using axial diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2002;16:93–102
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received June 3, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision July 29, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 2
1 Feb 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diffusion Tractography of the Cervical Spinal Cord by Using Parallel Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Kazuhiro Tsuchiya, Akira Fujikawa, Yuriko Suzuki
Diffusion Tractography of the Cervical Spinal Cord by Using Parallel Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2005, 26 (2) 398-400;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Diffusion Tractography of the Cervical Spinal Cord by Using Parallel Imaging
Kazuhiro Tsuchiya, Akira Fujikawa, Yuriko Suzuki
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2005, 26 (2) 398-400;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Description of the Technique
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • SpIC3D imaging: Spinal In-situ Contrast 3D imaging
  • Clinical Evaluation of Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine and Spinal Cord
  • Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord and its clinical applications
  • Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion Imaging of the Human Spinal Cord: Comparison with Conventional Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging
  • In Vivo Tracing of Neural Tracts in the Intact and Injured Spinal Cord of Marmosets by Diffusion Tensor Tractography
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Cone Beam CT Myelography
  • Cone Beam CTM for detecting CSF-venous Fistulas
  • Post-Procedural Brachial Neuritis Features
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire