Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Treatment Considerations for Vertebroplasty in Men

Alan Hammond, Lee H. Riley, Philippe Gailloud, David A. Nussbaum, Monica Watkins and Kieran J. Murphy
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2004, 25 (4) 639-641;
Alan Hammond
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee H. Riley III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Gailloud
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Nussbaum
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monica Watkins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kieran J. Murphy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Errata - May 01, 2004

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vertebroplasty is now a widely accepted image-guided intervention in patients with compression fracture. The purpose of this report is to look specifically at the male population undergoing vertebroplasty and identfy the management considerations distinct to men.

METHODS: The hospital medical records and radiographic studies of 24 men treated with vertebroplasty between February 1999 and November 2000 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS: Five patients presented with idiopathic or secondary osteoporosis. In two of these five men, malignancies were discovered by core biopsies taken at the time of vertebroplasty. Thirteen patients (54%) had secondary osteoporosis. Of this group, 10 patients (42%) were steroid dependent and three (13%) were hypogonadal. Five patients (21%) had traumatic events leading to fracture. One presented with known metastases.

CONCLUSION: Primary osteoporosis in men is unusual. In male patients without a definable cause of osteoporosis, known metastatic disease, or a significant history of trauma, the routine performance of a vertebral biopsy through the vertebroplasty needle before the injection of bone cement is indicated to identify unexpected neoplasm.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty was first performed in France in 1984 by Galibert and Deramond and has gained popularity in the United States over the past 5 years (1, 2). It has been shown to provide dramatic pain relief for vertebral body fractures associated with underlying osteoporosis or malignancy and has been successfully applied in cases where conservative management had failed and surgery was undesirable (3–5). Because of a higher incidence of osteoporosis, most patients referred for this procedure are women; however, men with vertebral body fractures from osteoporosis also present for treatment. Many of the characteristics of the male population with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures have recently been described (6–9). Like those in women, they are associated with significant morbidity and restriction of activities of daily living (10). The economic impact of osteoporotic fractures was estimated at nearly $2.7 billion in 1995 for men alone (11), making this a substantial health care problem from the standpoint of both cost and morbidity.

The purpose of this report is to define the demographics, diseases, and treatment requirements of men referred for vertebroplasty at our institution so that vertebroplasty management considerations unique to men can be determined.

Methods

The charts and radiographic studies of 29 consecutive male patients who underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty between February 1999 and November 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Five patients were omitted from the study because of inadequate medical records. Documentation from outside hospitals was included when available. Records were studied to determine the mechanism of fracture and onset of pain and significant past medical and surgical history, including secondary causes of osteoporosis and malignancy. All radiographic studies (conventional radiographs and CT and MR images) were reviewed.

Results

The average age at presentation was 72 years, ranging from 53 to 97 years. Only three patients were less than 60 years of age. Vertebral levels treated ranged from T6 to L5, with one treatment at C2.

Bone densitometry data were available for six patients. Five of these patients had T scores greater than 2.5 SDs below the mean for peak bone mass at all measured locations.

Five patients (21%) had an obvious traumatic event preceding the onset of severe pain. Most patients had an acute onset of back pain at the level of the fracture without a clear precipitating event or following activities such as sneezing, coughing, opening windows, or bending at the waist. In one case, a compression fracture occurred while the patient was admitted for treatment of acute kidney transplant rejection.

Five patients (21%) had no clear predisposition for vertebral fractures at presentation and were considered to have idiopathic or primary osteoporosis. Two of these patients (8%) had previously unknown metastatic disease to the spine, diagnosed by core biopsy taken at the time of vertebroplasty (nonsecretory multiple myeloma and plasma cell dyscrasia).

Thirteen patients (54%) had secondary causes of osteoporosis. Ten of these patients (42%) were receiving chronic steroids. Three patients (13%) were hypogonadal (primary endocrine failure, prolactinoma, and orchiectomy). One patient had secondary osteoporosis due to AIDS and antiretroviral drug therapy. Seven (29%) patients had a history of cigarette use.

Three patients (13%) had biopsy-proved metastatic disease to the spine. These include the two undiagnosed malignancies described above and a nonsmall cell adenocarcinoma from an unknown primary. Biopsy was taken at the time of vertebroplasty by using a biopsy gun introduced through the vertebroplasty canula. One patient presented with a pathologic fracture of an aneurismal bone cyst of the C2 vertebral body diagnosed by MR imaging.

Discussion

The epidemiology of osteoporosis in men is limited. According to a European-based population study, the prevalence of vertebral body deformity, a surrogate measure for vertebral body fracture, is greater in men than women below the age of 60 years. With further aging this is reversed, presumably because the incidence of osteoporosis increases more rapidly in women than in men (12, 13). The prevalence of osteoporosis in men in the United States has been estimated at between 3% and 7% (14, 15), and male osteoporosis accounts for up to 20% of all cases of osteoporosis (14). This prevalence, however, is increasing. Longer life spans and the aging of the population are bringing both greater numbers and greater percentages of the male population into the osteoporotic range.

The advanced age of men referred for vertebroplasty in this study is consistent with the increase incidence of both osteoporosis and malignancy with age. Smoking is also known to be associated with osteoporosis (16) and is reflected in the high incidence of patients with a smoking history (seven of 24 patients). Decreased bone attenuation is also expected in a male population with vertebral compression fractures (6). This was evident in all six cases, where densitometry data were available. These findings suggest that bone densitometry measurements with subsequent treatment if indicated would be beneficial for men referred for vertebroplasty.

Ten patients were receiving chronic steroids, six of them because of cigarette-induced lung disease. The side effect of osteopenia with glucocorticoid therapy has been clearly established. Its mechanism of action is complex, resulting in both increased bone resorption and inhibition of formation (17–19), which contribute to rapid bone loss (19).

Hypogonadism was present in three of the 13 men with secondary osteoporosis. Hypogonadism is known to frequently occur among those with vertebral body compression fractures (20, 21). Androgens are needed in young males to achieve peak bone mass, but the role of androgens in the elderly to maintain adequate mass is less clear. Androgens in the elderly may be needed as a substrate for the formation of estradiol, which correlates more closely with bone mineral attenuation in some studies (22).

Conclusion

Most men treated with vertebroplasty in our study had significant risk factors for osteoporosis or a history of metastatic disease or trauma. Two patients, however, had compression fractures that were wrongly attributed to idiopathic osteoporosis. Though most series indicate that 50% of cases of male osteoporosis may indeed be idiopathic (23), these patients were discovered, by core biopsy taken at the time of vertebroplasty, to have multiple myeloma and plasma cell dyscrasia. The discovery of two patients (8%) with previously occult malignancies suggests that core biopsy of male patients undergoing vertebroplasty is indicated in cases of presumed idiopathic osteoporosis.

References

  1. ↵
    Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurosurg Q 1987;33:166–168
  2. ↵
    Murphy KJ, Lin D, Gailloud P. Vertebroplasty in benign and malignant disease. Neurosurg Q 2001;11:290–301
  3. ↵
    Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: technique, indications, and results. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:533–546
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, et al. Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology 2000;39:1410–1414
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Murphy KJ, Deramond H. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in benign and malignant disease. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 2000;10:535–545
  6. ↵
    Evans S, Davie M. Vertebral fractures and bone mineral density in idiopathic, secondary and corticosteriod associated osteoporosis in men. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;50:269–275
  7. Legrand E, Chappard D, Pascaretti C, et al. Bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in men. Osteoporos Int 1999;10:265–270
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. Melton L, Atkinson E, O’Connor M, et al. Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:1915–1923
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Nguyen T, Eisman J, Kelly P, Sambrook P. Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in elderly men. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144:255–263
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Burger H, Van Daele PL, Grashuis K, et al. Vertebral deformities and functional impairment in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:152–157
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Ray NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, Melton LJ 3rd. Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:24–35
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Anderson FH, Cooper C. Hip and vertebral fractures. In: Orwoll ES, ed. Osteoporosis in Men: the Effects of Gender on Skeletal Health. San Diego: Academic Press,1999;29–49
  13. ↵
    O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, et al. The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European vertebral osteoporosis study. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:1010–1018
    PubMed
  14. ↵
    Gold DT. Outcomes and the personal impact of osteoporosis. In: Orwoll ES, ed. Osteoporosis in Men: the Effects of Gender on Skeletal Health. San Diego: Academic Press,1999;51–63
  15. ↵
    Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC, et al. Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1761–1768
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Slemenda CW, Christian JC, Reed T, et al. Long-term bone loss in men: effects of genetic and environmental factors. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:286–289
  17. ↵
    Lukert B, Raisz L. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: pathogenesis and management. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:352–364
  18. Manolagas S, Weinstein R. New developments in the pathogenesis and treatment of steroid-induced osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1999;14:1061–1066
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Reid I, Heap S. Determinants of vertebral mineral density in patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:2545–2548
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Jackson J, Keerekoper M. Osteoporosis in men: diagnosis, pathophysiology, and prevention. Medicine 1990;69:137–148
    PubMed
  21. ↵
    Kelepouris N, Harper K, Gannon F, et al. Severe osteoporosis in men. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:452–460
    PubMed
  22. ↵
    Amin S, Zhang D, Sawin C, et al. Association of hypogonadism and estradiol levels with bone mineral density in elderly men from the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:951–963
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Bilezikian JP, Kurland ES, Rosen CJ. Idiopathic osteoporosis in men. In: Orwoll ES, ed. Osteoporosis in Men: the Effects of Gender on Skeletal Health. San Diego: Academic Press,1999;395–416
  • Received July 29, 2002.
  • Accepted after revision June 12, 2003.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 4
1 Apr 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treatment Considerations for Vertebroplasty in Men
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Alan Hammond, Lee H. Riley, Philippe Gailloud, David A. Nussbaum, Monica Watkins, Kieran J. Murphy
Treatment Considerations for Vertebroplasty in Men
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2004, 25 (4) 639-641;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Treatment Considerations for Vertebroplasty in Men
Alan Hammond, Lee H. Riley, Philippe Gailloud, David A. Nussbaum, Monica Watkins, Kieran J. Murphy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2004, 25 (4) 639-641;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Errata
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Cone Beam CT Myelography
  • Post-Procedural Brachial Neuritis Features
  • Diagnostic Value of Brain WMH in SIH
Show more SPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire