Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Magic Angle Effects in MR Neurography

Karyn E. Chappell, Matthew D. Robson, Amanda Stonebridge-Foster, Alan Glover, Joanna M. Allsop, Andreanna D. Williams, Amy H. Herlihy, Jill Moss, Philip Gishen and Graeme M. Bydder
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2004, 25 (3) 431-440;
Karyn E. Chappell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew D. Robson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Stonebridge-Foster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Glover
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanna M. Allsop
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreanna D. Williams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy H. Herlihy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jill Moss
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Gishen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graeme M. Bydder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A and B, Transverse STIR (2500/30/160 TR/TEeffective/TI) MR images of the median nerve at 0° (A) and 55° (B). The median nerve (arrow) has a higher signal intensity in B. There is no apparent change in signal intensity in the flexor tendons (see also Fig 3).

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Plot of signal intensity against TE at 55° (▪) and 0° (•) on STIR images (1500/22, 33, 44, 55, 66/107 TR/TE/TI) with a monoexponential fit, in an adult volunteer. The signal intensity is higher at 55°. The mean T2 was also longer at 55° than at 0° (65.8 msec versus 47.2 msec).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Plots of signal intensity against orientation for the median nerve and hypothenar muscle and for an adjacent flexor tendon. Same subject as in Fig 1.

    A, The median nerve shows a 98% increase in signal intensity, which peaks at about 60° and decreases as the angulation is increased to 90°. Muscle shows no significant change in signal intensity.

    B, The adjacent flexor tendon, examined with the same sequence and plotted on the same scale, follows the same pattern but has a lower initial signal intensity and shows less change.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    A and B, STIR images of the brachial plexus (A) and nerves entering upper arm (B). The components of the brachial plexus (arrows in A) have a higher signal intensity than that of skeletal muscle, whereas nerves in the upper arm (arrows in B), emerging from the brachial plexus and nearly parallel to B0, are isointense or slightly hyperintense to muscle.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Sagittal MR images of the ulnar nerve with the elbow flexed to 125°.

    A, This most medial section shows that the nerve is isointense to muscle in the upper arm, but at the level of the condyle (arrow) signal intensity increases as the nerve rotates toward 55°.

    B, Middle section shows the nerve (arrow) perpendicular to B0 where it is isointense to muscle.

    C, Lateral section shows the nerve (arrows) at 125° to B0 where it is hyperintense to muscle.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Sagittal MR image of the median nerve with the wrist flexed to 55°. The nerve is parallel to B0 in the upper forearm and is isointense with muscle, but where the nerve is flexed toward 55° it shows increased signal intensity (arrow). This may simulate disease.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    A and B, Transverse MR images of the sciatic nerve orientated at 0° to B0 (A) and 55° to B0 (B). The signal intensity in the nerve (arrow) in B is higher than that in A.

  • Fig 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8.

    Electron micrograph of a human peripheral nerve (stain was aqueous uranyl nitrate followed by Reynolds lead citrate; original magnification, X 14,000). The numerous small dots are collagen fibers seen in cross section.

  • Fig 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 9.

    Diagram of brachial plexus. A black line at 55° to the body axis and B0 is superimposed. The components of the plexus are generally orientated parallel to this line, which is at the magic angle. (Reprinted from reference 33 with permission of Icon Learnings Systems.)

  • Fig 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 10.

    Fit of median nerve, muscle, and flexor tendon data to the model described in the Appendix. There is a close fit for median nerve and flexor tendon, assuming a significant fraction of tissue with dipolar interactions. The muscle data fit without need for significant dipolar interactions.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Details of study

    PartNo. of Subjects, Sex, Age (y)Nerve (s) StudiedOrientation to B0Field StrengthCoilSTIR Sequence ParametersResult Summary
    Healthy volunteers
     1n = 2 F 33, M 58Median0° and 55°1.5 TPlanar 6 × 8 cm3000/30/160, 4-mm section, 12-cm FOV, 256 × 512 matrixIncrease in signal intensity in nerve from 0° to 55°.
     2n = 3 F 42, M 28, M 58Median0° and 55°0.5 TPlanar 6 × 8 cm1500/22, 33, 44, 55, 66/107, 4-mm section, 192 × 256 matrixIncrease in signal intensity and T2 in nerve from 0° to 55°.
     3n = 2 M 33, M 58Median0° and 90° in 5° or 10° increments1.5 TPlanar 6 × 8 cm3000/30/160, 4-mm section, 12-cm FOV, 256 × 256 matrixProgressive increase in nerve signal intensity to 60° then decrease from 60° to 90°. Tendon similar. Muscle no change.
     4n = 2, F 30, M 58Brachial plexus and nerves in upper armBrachial plexus 55° (approx), nerves in upper arm 0°, (approx)1.5 TBrachial plexus array2500/28/150, 5-mm section, 35-cm FOV, 128 × 256 matrixBrachial plexus higher signal intensity than that of muscle. Exiting nerves isointense with muscle.
     5n = 2 F 30, M 58Ulnar nerve at elbow0° through 125°1.5 TPair of 10-cm circular planar coils2500/28/150, 5-mm section, 14-cm FOV, 128 × 256 matrixUlnar nerve isointense to muscle at 0° with increased signal intensity as it passes around condyle, isointense to muscle when at 90° to B0, then increased signal intensity in forearm at 125° to B0.
     6n = 2 F 40, M 58Median nerve parallel to B0 in upper arm and about 55° where wrist flexed0° parallel and about 55° (where flexed)1.5 TTwo 10-cm planar circular coils2500/28/150, 5-mm section, 12-cm FOV, 128 × 256 matrixNerve isointense with muscle in forearm. Increased signal intensity in nerve where flexed.
     7n = 2 M 32, M 58Sciatic0° and 55°1.5 TTwo 15-cm planar circular coils2500/28/150, 5-mm section, 20-cm FOV, 128 × 256 matrixIncreased signal intensity at 55° compared with 0°.
    Patients with RA
     8n = 2 F 43, F 48Median0° and 55°0.5 TPlanar 6 × 8 cm1500/22/105, 5-mm section, 15-cm FOVSignal intensity increase from 0° to 55° less than that for volunteers in part 2.
    • Note.—RA indicates rheumatoid arthritis.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 3
1 Mar 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Magic Angle Effects in MR Neurography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Karyn E. Chappell, Matthew D. Robson, Amanda Stonebridge-Foster, Alan Glover, Joanna M. Allsop, Andreanna D. Williams, Amy H. Herlihy, Jill Moss, Philip Gishen, Graeme M. Bydder
Magic Angle Effects in MR Neurography
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2004, 25 (3) 431-440;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Magic Angle Effects in MR Neurography
Karyn E. Chappell, Matthew D. Robson, Amanda Stonebridge-Foster, Alan Glover, Joanna M. Allsop, Andreanna D. Williams, Amy H. Herlihy, Jill Moss, Philip Gishen, Graeme M. Bydder
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2004, 25 (3) 431-440;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Appendix
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Comparing Orientation-Dependent Transverse Relaxation at 3T and 7T: Deciphering Anisotropic Relaxation Mechanisms in White Matter
  • On the origin of R2 orientation dependence angle offsets in white matter
  • Orientation dependent transverse relaxation in human brain white matter: The magic angle effect on a cylindrical helix
  • Myelin water imaging depends on white matter fiber orientation in the human brain
  • Visualization of Nigrosome 1 from the Viewpoint of Anatomic Structure
  • Review of the principal extra spinal pathologies causing sciatica and new MRI approaches
  • Magic Angle Effect: A Relevant Artifact in MR Neurography at 3T?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
  • Cone Beam CT Myelography
  • Post-Procedural Brachial Neuritis Features
Show more SPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire