Quantitative Assessment of Parenchymal and Ventricular Readjustment to Intracranial Pressure Relief

References

1. ↵
   Ernestus RI, Krüger K, Ernst S, Lackner K, Klug N. Relevance of magnetic resonance imaging for ventricular endoscopy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2002;45:72–77

   PubMed
2. Morota N, Watabe T, Inukai T, Hongo K, Nakagawa H. Anatomical variants in the floor of the third ventricle: implications for endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:531–534

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. Rohde V, Gilsbach JM. Anomalies and variants of the endoscopic anatomy for third ventriculostomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2000;43:111–117

   PubMed
4. Vinas FC, Dujovny N, Dujovny M. Microanatomical basis for the third ventriculostomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1996;39:116–121

   CrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   Wilcock DJ, Jaspan T, Worthington BS, Punt J. Neuro-endoscopic third ventriculostomy: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 1997;52:50–54

   PubMed
6. ↵
   Goumnerova LC, Frim DM. Treatment of hydrocephalus with third ventriculocisternostomy: outcome and CSF flow patterns. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;27:149–152

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Schroeder HW, Niendorf WR, Gaab MR. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 2002;96:1032–1040

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Armstrong DC, Dirks PB. Imaging correlates of successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 2000;92:915–919

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Schwartz TH, Ho B, Prestigiacomo CJ, Bruce JN, Feldstein NA, Goodman RR. Ventricular volume following third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 1999;91:20–25

   PubMed
10. ↵
    Schwartz TH, Yoon SS, Cutruzzola FW, Goodman RR. Third ventriculostomy: post-operative ventricular size and outcome. Minim Invas Neurosurg 1996;39:122–129

    PubMed
11. ↵
    Buxton N, Turner B, Ramli N, Vloeberghs M. Changes in third ventricular size with neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy: a blinded study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:385–387

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Wolters, CH. Influence of tissue conductivity inhomogeneity and anisotropy to EEG/MEG based source localization in the human brain [PhD Thesis]. Leipzig: University of Leipzig;2003
13. ↵
    Hojjatoleslami SA, Kruggel F. Segmentation of large brain lesions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:666–669

    CrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    Schnack HG, Hulshoff HE, Baare WF, Viergever MA, Kahn RS. Automatic segmentation of the ventricular system from MR images of the human brain. Neuroimage 2001;14:95–104

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Tittgemeyer M, Wollny G, Kruggel F. Visualising deformation fields computed by non-linear image registration. Comput Visual Sci 2002;5:45–51
16. ↵
    Wollny G, Kruggel F. Computational cost of non-rigid registration algorithms based on fluid dynamics. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002;21:946–952

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science