Reproducibility of Functional MR Imaging Results Using Two Different MR Systems

References

1. ↵
   Lee CC, Ward HA, Sharbrough FW, et al. Assessment of functional MR imaging in neurosurgical planning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1511–1519

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. Ruge MI, Victor J, Hosain S, et al. Concordance between functional magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative language mapping. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;72:95–102

   CrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   Beisteiner R, Lanzenberger R, Novak K, et al. Improvement of presurgical patient evaluation by generation of functional magnetic resonance risk maps. Neurosci Lett 2000;290:13–16

   CrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   Hirsch J, Ruge MI, Kim KH, et al. An integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging procedure for preoperative mapping of cortical areas associated with tactile, motor, language, and visual functions. Neurosurgery 2000;47:711–21, discussion 721–2.

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Yetkin FZ, McAulie TL, Cox R, Haughton VM. Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:95–98

   Abstract
6. Moser E, Teichtmeister C, Diemling M. Reproducibility and postprocessing of gradient-echo functional MRI to improve localization of brain activity in the human visual cortex. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:567–579

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Hoogenraad FG, Sprenger M, Valk J, Scheltens P. Test-retest analysis with functional MR of the activated area in the human visual cortex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1317–1322

   Abstract
8. Genovese CR, Noll DC, Eddy WF. Estimating test-retest reliability in functional MR imaging. I: statistical methodology. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:497–507

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Noll DC, Genovese CR, Nystrom LE, et al. Estimating test-retest reliability in functional MR imaging. II: application to motor and cognitive activation studies. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:508–517

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. Le TH, Hu X. Methods for assessing accuracy and reliability in functional MRI. NMR Biomed 1997;10:160–164

    CrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    Baumgartner R, Scarth G, Teichtmeister C, Somorjai R, Moser E. Fuzzy clustering of gradient-echo functional MRI in the human visual cortex. I: reproducibility. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:1094–1101

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Hoogenraad FG, Sprenger M, Scheltens P. Within-subject reproducibility of visual activation patterns with functional magnetic resonance imaging using multislice echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:105–113

    CrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    Cohen MS, DuBois RM. Stability, repeatability, and the expression of signal magnitude in functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:33–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. Machielsen WC, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Witter MP. FMRI of visual encoding: reproducibility of activation. Hum Brain Mapp 2000;9:156–164

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    McGonigle DJ, Howseman AM, Athwal BS, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, Holmes AP. Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences. Neuroimage 2000;11:708–734

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Miki A, Raz J, van Erp TG, Liu CS, Haselgrove JC, Liu GT. Reproducibility of visual activation in functional MR imaging and effects of postprocessing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:910–915

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. Miki A, Raz J, Englander SA, et al. Reproducibility of visual activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging at very high field strength (4 tesla). Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45:1–4

    PubMed
18. ↵
    Miki A, Liu GT, Englander SA, et al. Reproducibility of visual activation during checkerboard stimulation in functional magnetic resonance imaging at 4 tesla. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45:151–155

    PubMed
19. ↵
    Eddy WF, Fitzgerald M, Noll DC. Improved image registration by using Fourier interpolation. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:923–931

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Goebel R, Khorram-Sefat D, Muckli L, Hacker H, Singer W. The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery. Eur J Neurosci 1998;10:1563–1573

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:636–647

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Schmithorst VJ, Dardzinski BJ, Holland SK. Simultaneous correction of ghost and geometric distortion artifacts in EPI using a multiecho reference scan. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:535–539

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    Jenkinson M. Improved unwarping of EPI volumes using regularised B0 maps. Human Brain Mapping Brighton UK2001
24. ↵
    Krings T, Schreckenberger M, Rohde V, et al. Metabolic and electrophysiological validation of functional MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:762–771

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    Yetkin FZ, Mueller WM, Morris GL, et al. Functional MR activation correlated with intraoperative cortical mapping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1311–1315

    Abstract