Reinterpretation of Cross-Sectional Images in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Cancer Center

References

1. ↵
   Kazerooni NL, Kazerooni EA, Quint LE, Orringer MB. Added value of thoracic radiology specialist interpretation of CT scans for lung cancer consultations in a thoracic surgery clinic (abstr). Radiology 1998;209(P):171
2. ↵
   Gollub MJ, Panicek DM, Bach AM, Penalver BS, Castellino RA. Clinical importance of reinterpretation of body CT scans obtained elsewhere in patients referred for care at a tertiary cancer center. Radiology 1999;210:109–112

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Kalbhen CL, Yetter EM, Love L, Moncada R, Lawson TL, Albain KA. Outside film reviews of thoracic imaging studies in oncology patients (abstr). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170(suppl):77
4. ↵
   Hricak H, Kalbhen CL, Scheidler JE, Schwartz LH, Yu KK, Adams D. Value of expert interpretation in abdominal oncologic imaging: a multicenter study (abstr). Radiology 1997;205(P):225
5. ↵
   Bechtold RE, Chen MYM, Ott DJ, et al. Interpretation of abdominal CT: analysis of errors and their causes. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:681–685

   CrossRefPubMed
6. Picolli CW, Schweitzer ME, Mitchell DG, Ricci JA, Levin DC, Harford RJ. Peer-review quality assessment method for MR imaging: lower-extremity results from 31 centers (abstr). Radiology 1993;189(P):136
7. ↵
   Wakeley CJ, Jones AM, Kabala JE, Prince D, Goddard PR. Audit of the value of double reading magnetic resonance imaging films. Br J Radiol 1995;68:358–360

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Bollen ECM, Goei R, v.’t Hof-Grootenboer BE, Versteege CWM, Engelshove HA, Lamers RJS. Interobserver variability and accuracy of computed tomographic assessment of nodal status in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:158–162

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Muller NL, Evans KG. Interobserver variability and accuracy of computed tomographic assessment of nodal status in lung cancer (invited commentary). Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58:162