Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

Recurrent Neurovascular Hypertension: MR Findings Before and After Surgical Treatments

Elke R. Gizewski, Ralf M. Spitthöver, Helmut Wiedemayer, Isabel Wanke, Thomas Philipp and Michael Forsting
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2001, 22 (6) 1168-1170;
Elke R. Gizewski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralf M. Spitthöver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helmut Wiedemayer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabel Wanke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Philipp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Forsting
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: A case of recurrent brain stem edema after surgical vascular decompression in a patient with neurogenic hypertension is presented. The surgical treatment resulted in occlusion of the left vertebral artery, stable blood pressure values, and no recurrence of the brain stem edema. MR imaging and MR angiography are excellent methods with which to assess patients suspected of having neurovascular hypertension, both before and after surgical treatment.

Despite an increasing number of antihypertensive drugs, there are still certain patients who do not respond to any type of pharmaceutical therapy. Some of these patients might have so-called neurogenic hypertension caused by pulsatile vascular compression of the lower brain stem, specifically of the left lateral medulla oblongata (1). Because this disease can be treated by neurovascular decompression, establishing criteria for successful surgical intervention is critical (2).

Case Report

A 33-year-old woman had a 14-year history of hypertension, with severe aggravation within the past 3 years. Multiple antihypertensive strategies failed to control her blood pressure. Even with continuous infusion of urapidil and nitrates, her blood pressure rose to 250/150 mm Hg. Routine CT revealed an extremely elongated left vertebral and basilar artery with marked compression of the left ventrolateral medulla oblongata. These findings were confirmed by initial MR imaging in March 1999. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography confirmed extreme vessel elongation; T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR images additionally revealed a hyperintense signal of the medulla oblongata, indicating an intraaxial edema (Fig 1). On the basis of these findings and the still untreatable hypertension, neurovascular decompression was performed.

fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
fig 1.

T2-weighted transversal MR image reveals extreme elongation of the vertebrobasilar junction and a hyperintense signal of the left lateral medulla oblongata (arrow), both of which indicate an intraaxial edema.fig 2. T2-weighted MR image after first microvascular decompression reveals no hyperintense signal of the left medulla oblongata, indicating disappearance of the edema. Owing to the neurovascular decompression, a small ischemic infarction of the left cerebellum developed.fig 3. T2-weighted MR image during recurrence of elevated blood pressure again reveals an edema of the brain stem at a similar location (arrowheads).fig 4. Fourteen days after second surgical intervention, MR angiography reveals complete occlusion of the left vertebral artery.fig 5. T2-weighted MR image after second microvascular decompression reveals no hyperintense signal of the left medulla oblongata, indicating a disappearance of the edema. There are residual defects of a small ischemic infarction of the left cerebellum from the first neurovascular decompression

Immediately after surgery and for the next 3 weeks, the patient had unstable blood pressure with barely treatable increases and decreases. After this period, blood pressure was excellent with values up to 150/100 mm Hg for approximately 1 month. Two MR images during this period revealed complete resolution of the previous visible edema (Fig 2). As a complication of the neurovascular decompression, MR imaging now revealed a small ischemic area in the left cerebellum and within the Wallenberg territory. Clinically the patient showed only mild ataxia and slight weakness of the right extremities.

Two months later her blood pressure again increased to 220/140 mm Hg. MR imaging again revealed an edema of the brain stem, in a similar location as before vascular decompression (Fig 3).

Owing to these MR findings, a second surgery was performed with the same approach and the elongated vertebrobasilar complex was fixed at the occipital bone. The procedure again led to an immediate marked decrease of blood pressure (mean, 150/100 mm Hg), and the edema of the ventrolateral medulla oblongata completely disappeared. At the time of this writing, the patient's blood pressure remains at a stable level of about 150/95 mm Hg with metoprolol, candesartan cilexefil, and clonidine therapy. The patient no longer has excessive peaks of blood pressure. There were no additional neurologic symptoms after the second surgery.

Routine Doppler sonography performed after the second surgery revealed occlusion of the left vertebral artery, which was confirmed by MR angiography (Fig 4). Follow-up MR imaging 6 months later did not reveal any additional ischemic lesions in the hind-brain circulation and confirmed the total disappearance of the brain stem edema (Fig 5).

Discussion

According to the hypothesis of Janetta et al (1), arterial compression of the left ventrolateral medulla oblongata close to the root entry zone of cranial nerves IX and X by looping arteries can play an important role in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. Furthermore, experimental results revealed that there is a mechanism of neurogenic hypertension controlled by central neurons in the lower part of the brain stem. Janetta et al were able to induce hypertensive values with a balloon model in baboons, indicating the importance of pulsatile compression of the brain stem (3). The posterior inferior cerebellar artery and the vertebral artery were found to cause hypertension in humans (4–7). So far, there have been no new findings in our patient. However, this case report highlights an important point: MR imaging can show insufficient vascular decompression of the brain stem and recurrent brain stem edema, findings which should lead to repeat surgery when vascular decompression is unsuccessful.

The literature shows that hypertension recurs in as many as 50% of patients after decompressive therapy (1, 8). Debate continues about whether such recurrence indicates a lack of response to surgery or a technical failure of the first intervention. As the follow-up of our patient indicates, the recurrence of an edema in the lower brain stem after a symptom-free interval might indicate a recurrence of vascular compression. In this type of patient with hypertension, the vertebrobasilar complex often is extremely elongated and, thus, such cases are not truly comparable with the vascular decompression seen with trigeminal neuralgia or hemispasm facialis. In these patients, repeat surgery with technically modified decompression strategy might be justified.

The excellent results in our patient (stable blood pressure, no recurrent brain stem edema) after the second operation might have been caused by the unintended occlusion of the left vertebral artery. The unintended secondary occlusion of the left vertebral artery in our patient suggests the possibility of endovascular occlusion as the primary treatment technique. Further investigation might be warranted.

In summary, we have presented a case of recurrent brain stem edema after surgical vascular decompression in a patient with neurogenic hypertension. After an initial period of normotension, the patient's blood pressure again increased to uncontrolled high levels and, on the basis of MR findings, a second operation was performed. This procedure resulted in occlusion of the left vertebral artery, stable blood pressure values, and no recurrence of the brain stem edema. We suggest that MR imaging should be used to assess the need for repeat surgery in patients with recurrent neurovascular hypertension.

Footnotes

  • 1 Address reprint requests to Elke R. Gizewski, M.D.

References

  1. ↵
    Jannetta PJ, Segal R, Wolfson SK. Neurogenic hypertension: etiology and surgical treatment, I: observations in 53 patients. Ann Surg 1985;201:391-396
    PubMed
  2. ↵
    Morimoto S, Sasaki S, Miki S, et al. Pulsatile compression of the rostral ventrolateral medulla in hypertension. Hypertension 1997;29:514-518
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Jannetta PJ, Segal R, Wolfson SK, Dujovny M, Semba A, Cook EE. Neurogenic hypertension: etiology and surgical treatment, II: observations in an experimental nonhuman primate model. Ann Surg 1985;201:391-396
  4. ↵
    Kleineberg B, Becker H, Gaab MR, Naraghi R. Essential hypertension associated with neurovascular compression: angiographic findings. Neurosurgery 1992;30:834-841
    PubMed
  5. Fein JM, Frishman W. Neurogenic hypertension related to vascular compression of the lateral medulla. Neurosurgery 1980;6:615-622
    PubMed
  6. Colon GP, Quint DJ, Dickinson LD, et al. Magnetic resonance evaluation of ventrolateral medullary compression in essential hypertension. J Neurosurg 1998;88:226-231
    PubMed
  7. Akimura T, Furutani Y, Jimi Y, et al. Essential hypertension and neurovascular compression at the ventrolateral medulla oblongata: MR evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:401-405
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. Wilkins RH. Neurovascular compression syndromes. Neurol Clin 1985;3:359-372
    PubMed
  • Received July 6, 2000.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 22 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 22, Issue 6
1 Jun 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recurrent Neurovascular Hypertension: MR Findings Before and After Surgical Treatments
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Elke R. Gizewski, Ralf M. Spitthöver, Helmut Wiedemayer, Isabel Wanke, Thomas Philipp, Michael Forsting
Recurrent Neurovascular Hypertension: MR Findings Before and After Surgical Treatments
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2001, 22 (6) 1168-1170;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Recurrent Neurovascular Hypertension: MR Findings Before and After Surgical Treatments
Elke R. Gizewski, Ralf M. Spitthöver, Helmut Wiedemayer, Isabel Wanke, Thomas Philipp, Michael Forsting
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2001, 22 (6) 1168-1170;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case Report
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire