Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleEDITORIAL

Device-Mediated Effect versus the Healing Response in Interventional Neuroradiology

David F. Kallmes
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2001, 22 (10) 1810;
David F. Kallmes
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The case report by Blanc et al. in this issue of AJNR is important in several respects. First, the report presents a rare but devastating complication that may occur with Hunterian occlusion for treatment of giant aneurysms. Second, the management of the case can be used as a model for other practitioners who encounter similar complications. Third, and perhaps most relevant, the report serves as a reminder that the physiologic response of the patient to an embolic agent may be of as much importance as the mechanical characteristics of the embolic agent itself.

Most literature on interventional procedures focuses primarily on aspects of the implanted device, including technique of implantation and therapeutic end point. However, in the case of occlusion devices, thrombus induced by the procedure often represents the primary therapeutic “device.” For instance, endosaccular occlusion of aneurysms by use of platinum coils, even in the most skilled hands, results in <30% of aneurysm volume occupied by coils. The long-term outcome of platinum coil embolization of aneurysms therefore probably depends to a greater extent on the body's own processing of the coil-induced thrombus than on the coils themselves. Furthermore, polyvinyl alcohol embolization of vascular malformations and tumors results in reliable tissue devascularization. Much or most of the treatment effect represents propagation of thrombus within the embolized tumor bed, with only a minority of the vessels occluded with the polyvinyl alcohol particles themselves. Last, although balloon occlusion of the carotid artery seems to be a simple device-mediated occlusion technique, much of the permanent vessel occlusion is effected by organization of thrombus induced by the balloon rather than by the balloon itself. Each of these examples emphasizes the paramount importance of the body's own healing mechanism in determining outcome of the interventional procedure.

The case report by Blanc et al. represents an important example of the natural healing mechanism gone wrong. Permanent carotid artery occlusion is a highly efficacious technique for obliteration of large and giant aneurysms at the skull base. As noted above, occlusion of these aneurysms is effected through organization of balloon- or coil-induced thrombus in the parent artery and aneurysm cavity. In most cases, the thrombosis of the aneurysm is relatively controlled. Over months and years, the thrombosed aneurysm retracts and becomes small and permanently occluded. However, organizing thrombus is an extraordinarily “biologically active” tissue. Cytokines released from cellular elements within the thrombus, including platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages, promote angiogenesis, tissue ingrowth, and matrix production. Fibrin and fibrin degradation products are also important substrates for the process of thrombus organization. In experimental aneurysms, we note that extensive neovascularity is present throughout aneurysm cavities within the first few weeks after coil embolization. Increased capillary permeability of these neovessels within the evolving thrombus likely promotes transient enlargement of the aneurysm cavity. It is well known that permanent occlusion of giant aneurysms around the skull base can cause transient increased symptoms of cranial neuropathy. In the current case, it seems that such processes have been promoted to the point of occlusion of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery.

Many research labs, including our own, have focused substantial efforts on improving efficacy of aneurysm embolization by increasing the “biological activity” of coils. Such research has been stimulated by the widely held position that platinum is biologically inert and, to improve intra-aneurysmal healing, other agents need to be added to coils. Perhaps this line of reasoning is flawed. As shown by the behavior of the giant aneurysm in the current case, blood clot is extraordinarily “biologically active.” Perhaps we could harness the physiology of a thrombus-filled aneurysm to effect permanent aneurysm occlusion, without need for coil modification techniques. One area to which we might turn for guidance is the cardiology literature, which is replete with important advances such as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and local radiation therapy that rely on modification of the body's response to the implanted devices to improve therapeutic efficacy.

The current case reminds us of the importance of the medical management of cases, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and potentially steroid therapy, to improve outcome. Perhaps more importantly, it reminds us that as therapists, we are only tipping the balance against the pathologic process and, in the end, relying on Mother Nature to cure the pathologic abnormality.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 22 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 22, Issue 10
1 Nov 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Device-Mediated Effect versus the Healing Response in Interventional Neuroradiology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
David F. Kallmes
Device-Mediated Effect versus the Healing Response in Interventional Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2001, 22 (10) 1810;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Device-Mediated Effect versus the Healing Response in Interventional Neuroradiology
David F. Kallmes
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2001, 22 (10) 1810;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Supporting Imaging Research: A Framework for Equity and Excellence in Neuroradiology
  • Neuroimaging within the Stroke Treatment Paradigm – An Update from the Brain Attack Coalition
  • Advancing Neuroradiology through Innovation and Member Engagement
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire