Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Exposure of Medical Personnel to Methylmethacrylate Vapor during Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

Harry J. Cloft, David N. Easton, Mary E. Jensen, David F. Kallmes and Jacques E. Dion
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 1999, 20 (2) 352-353;
Harry J. Cloft
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David N. Easton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary E. Jensen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David F. Kallmes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacques E. Dion
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: The occupational exposure to methylmethacrylate (MMA) vapor during percutaneous vertebroplasty was determined. During five vertebroplasty procedures, air-sampling pumps were attached to medical personnel. MMA vapor levels in the samples were then quantified using gas chromatography. The samples collected yielded MMA vapor levels of less than five parts per million (ppm). The MMA vapor concentrations measured were well below the recommended maximum exposure of 100 ppm over the course of an 8-hour workday.

Percutaneous injection of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement into vertebral body compression fractures, a technique known as percutaneous vertebroplasty, has been recommended for pain relief and spine stabilization (1–5). Vertebroplasty has been used to treat pathologic compression fractures resulting from osteoporosis (1), metastases (2, 5), and hemangioma (4). The PMMA mixture used for vertebroplasty is prepared by the operator at the time of the procedure (1). Preparation of the PMMA mixture exposes the patient and the medical staff to methylmethacrylate (MMA) vapor, which, in high concentrations, can have toxic effects (6–12). We analyzed air samples obtained during vertebroplasty to determine if the MMA vapor levels were potentially hazardous.

Methods

The technical aspects of the vertebroplasty procedure have been described previously (1). The PMMA was mixed on a workbench without the use of a fume hood or other vapor control device. The room air flow from the heating and cooling system was 22 air changes per hour. A total of approximately 20 mL of PMMA mixture was prepared and used as described previously (1). Air-sampling pumps were attached to the surgical gowns of two physician operators involved in mixing and injecting the PMMA mixture, yielding one sample from each physician. MMA vapors were drawn through air-sampler tubes containing porous XAD-2 resin. Samples were collected throughout the procedure at a rate of 100 cm3/min. The duration of the procedure was approximately 1 hour. MMA vapor levels in the samples were then quantified using gas chromatography. Sampling and measurement techniques were performed as described previously (6).

Results

The 10 samples obtained from the physician operators yielded MMA vapor levels below the detection capability of the measuring technique, which was 4.88 parts per million (ppm). The measured values represent exposures during a period of approximately 1 hour.

Discussion

The exposure to MMA vapor concentration realized during percutaneous vertebroplasty (< 5 ppm) is well below the published recommended standard of 100 ppm (7). This recommended exposure level is a time-weighted average for an 8-hour workday. The measured values represent exposures during a period of approximately 1 hour. If each person's exposure is averaged over an 8-hour day, accounting for 7 hours of no exposure, the calculated time-weighted average exposure would be reduced by a factor of seven eighths. Under the conditions of this survey, the levels are, therefore, well within an acceptable range.

McLaughlin et al (8) also found occupational exposure of medical personnel to MMA to be at an acceptable level. These investigators measured MMA vapor concentrations achieved during total hip arthroplasty procedures in the operating room at 277 ppm immediately after the time of mixing, dropping exponentially thereafter, with concentrations of less than 10 ppm by 6 minutes after mixing. Our study did not measure the time course of MMA vapor exposure, as did the study by McLaughlin et al (8), but rather measured the average exposure over 1 hour. The amount of PMMA used in a hip arthroplasty is approximately 20 mL (9), which is the same amount used for a typical vertebroplasty.

PMMA is used to perform cranioplasty, to implant orthopedic prostheses, and to make artificial eyes and dentures. It is used in numerous products outside of medicine, including artificial fingernails, safety glass, and industrial coatings. Because of its widespread use, there has been great interest in environmental safety and toxicity related to exposure to MMA vapors and implantation of PMMA into humans. Acute exposure to extremely high levels of MMA vapor can cause liver necrosis, pulmonary edema, and pulmonary emphysema (10). Rats exposed to air containing 100 ppm of MMA for more than 1 hour developed interalveolar congestion and hemorrhage, as well as pulmonary vasodilatation and edema (11). Occupational exposure of medical personnel is well below the levels necessary to elicit these toxic effects. However, other less dramatic effects might occur. Dental students who were exposed to MMA vapor while preparing dentures complained of nausea and lack of appetite (12). MMA is known to be a potent allergenic sensitizer (13) and can cause local reactions with dermal exposure (14). It is also known to be a potential pulmonary toxin (11, 15); a study of industrial workers with chronic exposure to MMA vapor levels of 9 to 38.5 ppm found that 20% of the workers had a chronic cough, versus only 1% of workers in a control group with no MMA exposure (15). This study also found increased airway resistance as measured by spirometry in workers exposed to MMA vapor as compared with control subjects (15). A case of asthma induced by occupational exposure to MMA has also been reported (16).

An additional concern to workers exposed to chemical vapors is carcinogenicity. The carcinogenic potential of MMA vapors is not clearly defined. Chronic exposure of mice to MMA levels of 1000 ppm for 2 years was not found to induce an increased incidence of neoplasms (17). One study indicated that there may be an increase in mortality from colon and rectal cancer among industrial workers chronically exposed to uncontrolled levels of acrylate monomers (including MMA) (18). Workers exposed to acrylate monomers at legally controlled levels, however, had no increased mortality from colon and rectal cancer (18). Information acquired to date is inadequate to determine if MMA vapors might affect fertility or have teratogenic potential or other adverse effects on the fetus.

Conclusion

MMA vapor levels to which medical personnel are exposed during percutaneous vertebroplasty are well below the level typically considered hazardous. However, it is important to note that some individuals may experience adverse effects, such as asthma, coughing, nausea, and decreased appetite, when exposed to levels typically considered to be within acceptable limits. At the levels of MMA vapor measured in our study, routine use of a fume hood is not necessary for MMA use in vertebroplasty, but a fume hood may be useful to reduce exposure of medical staff who are particularly sensitive to MMA vapor.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Address reprint requests to Harry J. Cloft, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Box 170, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908.

References

  1. ↵
    Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Dion JE. Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fracture: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1897-1904
    Abstract
  2. ↵
    Kaemmerlen P, Thiesse P, Bouvard H, Biron P, Mornex F, Jonas P. Vertebroplastie percutanee dans le traitement des metastases: technique et resultats. J Radiol 1989;70:557-562
    PubMed
  3. Gangi A, Kastler BA, Dietemann JL. Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:83-86
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D. Note preliminaire sur le traitement des angiomes vertebraux par vertebroplastie percutanee. Neurochirurgie 1987;33:166-168
    PubMed
  5. Weill A, Chiras J, Simon J, et al. Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology 1996;199:241-247
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Methyl methacrylate: method 2537. In: NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1995;1-4
  7. ↵
    American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH Worldwide; 1996:112
  8. ↵
    McLaughlin RE, Barkalow JA, Allen MS. Pulmonary toxicity of methylmethacrylate vapors: an environmental study. Arch Environ Health 1979;34:336-338
    PubMed
  9. ↵
    Dahl OE, Johnsen H, Kierulf P, et al. Intrapulmonary thrombin generation and its relation to monomethylmethacrylate plasma levels during hip arthroplasty. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1992;36:331-335
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Kessler MJ, Kupper JL, Brown RJ. Accidental methyl methacrylate inhalation toxicity in a rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Lab Animal Sci 1977;27:388-390
  11. ↵
    Raje RR, Ahmad S, Weisbroth SH. Methylmethacrylate: tissue distribution and pulmonary damage in rats following acute inhalation. Res Comm Chem Path Pharm 1985;50:151-154
  12. ↵
    Tansy MF, Benhayem S, Probst S, et al. The effects of methyl methacrylate vapor on gastric motor function. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;89:372-376
    PubMed
  13. ↵
    Wheater RH. Hazard of methyl methacrylate to operating room personnel. JAMA 1976;235:2652
  14. ↵
    Fries IB. Contact dermatitis in surgeons from methyl methacrylate bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg 1975;57A:547-549
    PubMed
  15. ↵
    Marez T, Edme JL, Boulenguez C, Shirali P, Haguenoer JM. Bronchial symptoms and respiratory function in workers exposed to methylmethacrylate. Br J Indust Med 1993;50:894-897
    PubMed
  16. ↵
    Lozewicz S, Davison AG, Hopkirk A, et al. Occupational asthma due to methyl methacrylate and cyanoacrylates. Thorax 1985;40:836-839
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Chan PC, Eustis SL, Huff JE, Haseman JK, Ragan H. Two-year inhalation carcinogenesis studies of methyl methacrylate in rats and mice: inflammation and degeneration of nasal endothelium. Toxicology 1988;52:237-252
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Walker AM, Cohen AJ, Loughlin JE, et al. Mortality and cancer of the colon or rectum among workers exposed to ethyl acrylate and methyl acrylate. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991;17:7-19
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 14, 1997.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 20, Issue 2
1 Feb 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exposure of Medical Personnel to Methylmethacrylate Vapor during Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Harry J. Cloft, David N. Easton, Mary E. Jensen, David F. Kallmes, Jacques E. Dion
Exposure of Medical Personnel to Methylmethacrylate Vapor during Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1999, 20 (2) 352-353;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Exposure of Medical Personnel to Methylmethacrylate Vapor during Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
Harry J. Cloft, David N. Easton, Mary E. Jensen, David F. Kallmes, Jacques E. Dion
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1999, 20 (2) 352-353;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Serum and Breast Milk Levels of Methylmethacrylate Following Surgeon Exposure During Arthroplasty
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Cone Beam CT Myelography
  • Post-Procedural Brachial Neuritis Features
  • Diagnostic Value of Brain WMH in SIH
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire